Politics
How Much Do Countries Spend on Healthcare Compared to the Military?
Healthcare vs. Military Spending, by Country
Keeping citizens both healthy and secure are key priorities for many national governments around the world—but ultimately, decisions must be made on how tax dollars are spent to accomplish these objectives, and funding must fall into one bucket or another.
This infographic from PixlParade examines how much 46 different countries put towards healthcare and military spending in 2018, per capita.
Head to Head: Healthcare versus Military
Data for government and compulsory healthcare spending comes from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Note that these figures do not include spending through private insurance or out-of-pocket expenses.
Meanwhile, the data for military spending comes from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
Country | Health spending (Per capita, 2018 US$) | Military spending (Per capita, 2018 US$) |
---|---|---|
U.S. | $9,008.77 | $2,086.50 |
Norway | $5,361.00 | $1,323.90 |
Germany | $5,262.83 | $559.50 |
Switzerland | $4,687.26 | $546.00 |
Sweden | $4,623.68 | $574.90 |
Netherlands | $4,461.30 | $651.50 |
Denmark | $4,441.07 | $792.50 |
Luxembourg | $4,385.66 | $650.80 |
France | $4,310.55 | $791.00 |
Austria | $4,137.25 | $381.00 |
Belgium | $3,868.82 | $421.60 |
Japan | $3,787.74 | $366.50 |
Canada | $3,719.86 | $613.10 |
Ireland | $3,629.43 | $229.80 |
UK | $3,336.55 | $743.10 |
Finland | $3,331.65 | $680.30 |
Australia | $3,311.33 | $1,078.00 |
NZ | $3,188.39 | $532.30 |
Czhechia | $2,632.67 | $254.10 |
Italy | $2,574.96 | $458.70 |
Malta | $2,448.73 | $152.20 |
Spain | $2,414.69 | $381.70 |
Slovenia | $2,227.77 | $254.80 |
Portugal | $1,906.23 | $431.00 |
South Korea | $1,848.76 | $841.70 |
Israel | $1,828.40 | $2,357.50 |
Estonia | $1,744.57 | $458.60 |
Lithuania | $1,599.15 | $377.10 |
Croatia | $1,553.67 | $232.50 |
Poland | $1,511.18 | $317.50 |
Hungary | $1,493.01 | $184.60 |
Romania | $1,344.34 | $223.50 |
Greece | $1,331.19 | $547.10 |
Chile | $1,282.59 | $296.10 |
Latvia | $1,111.67 | $375.20 |
Cyprus | $1,103.03 | $374.30 |
Bulgaria | $1,042.85 | $136.30 |
Turkey | $946.83 | $238.60 |
Russia | $873.00 | $421.20 |
Colombia | $864.16 | $204.10 |
Mexico | $582.05 | $46.30 |
Brazil | $388.98 | $134.50 |
South Africa | $267.85 | $63.50 |
China | $249.83 | $177.60 |
Indonesia | $55.62 | $28.20 |
India | $18.80 | $49.00 |
Source: OECD | Source: SIPRI |
Note: There are minor discrepancies in comparing table data to original sources due to recent estimate updates. Figures for Brazil, South Africa, China, Indonesia, and India come from the World Bank (2017).
The Top 10 Healthcare Spenders
The U.S. leads the world in government healthcare spending at $9,008 per capita – over 1.5 times that of Norway, the next-highest country examined.
Country | Per capita health spending | % of GDP | % of health spending |
---|---|---|---|
U.S. | $9,008.77 | 14.3% | 84.7% |
Norway | $5,361.00 | 8.6% | 85.3% |
Germany | $5,262.83 | 9.7% | 84.6% |
Switzerland | $4,687.26 | 7.6% | 64.4% |
Sweden | $4,623.68 | 9.3% | 85.1% |
Netherlands | $4,461.30 | 8.2% | 82.1% |
Denmark | $4,441.07 | 8.5% | 83.9% |
Luxembourg | $4,385.66 | 4.4% | 84.1% |
France | $4,310.55 | 9.4% | 83.6% |
Austria | $4,137.25 | 7.7% | 74.7% |
While per-capita government spending on healthcare in the U.S. is the highest in the world, this has not necessarily brought about better outcomes (such as longer life expectancy) compared to other developed nations.
It’s also worth mentioning that the above figures do not cover all healthcare costs incurred by citizens, as they do not account for private insurance spending or out-of-pocket expenses. According to OECD data, these additional costs tend to be the highest in places like Switzerland and the United States.
The Top 10 Military Spenders
Israel has the highest rate of military spending per capita, and has the distinction of being the only country on this list to invest more in defense than in healthcare.
Country | Per capita military spending | % of GDP | Total expenditure, US$M |
---|---|---|---|
Israel | $2,357.50 | 5.3% | $19,759M |
U.S. | $2,086.50 | 3.3% | $682,491M |
Norway | $1,323.90 | 1.6% | $7,067M |
Australia | $1,078.00 | 1.9% | $26,840M |
South Korea | $841.70 | 2.5% | $43,070M |
Denmark | $792.50 | 1.3% | $4,559M |
France | $791.00 | 1.3% | $51,410M |
UK | $743.10 | 1.8% | $49,892M |
Finland | $680.30 | 1.4% | $3,757M |
Netherlands | $651.50 | 1.2% | $11,115M |
Although the United States comes in second place here as well, in absolute terms, the U.S. puts more money into military expenditures than many other countries combined, at almost $700 billion per year.
Markets
30 Years of Gun Manufacturing in America
The U.S. has produced nearly 170 million firearms over the past three decades. Here are the numbers behind America’s gun manufacturing sector.

30 Years of Gun Manufacturing in America
While gun sales have been brisk in recent years, the uncertainty surrounding COVID-19 was a boon for the gun industry.
From 2010-2019, an average of 13 million guns were sold legally in the U.S. each year. In 2020 and 2021, annual gun sales sharply increased to 20 million.
While the U.S. does import millions of weapons each year, a large amount of firearms sold in the country were produced domestically. Let’s dig into the data behind the multi-billion dollar gun manufacturing industry in America.
Gun Manufacturing in the United States
According to a recent report from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), the U.S. has produced nearly 170 million firearms over the past three decades, with production increasing sharply in recent years.
America’s gunmakers produce a wide variety of firearms, but they’re generally grouped into five categories; pistols, rifles, shotguns, revolvers, and everything else.
Below is a breakdown of firearms manufactured in the country over the past 30 years, by type:
Year | Pistols | Rifles | Revolvers | Shotguns | Misc. Firearms | Total Firearms |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1989 | 1,404,753 | 1,407,400 | 628,573 | 935,541 | 42,126 | 4,418,393 |
1990 | 1,371,427 | 1,211,664 | 470,495 | 848,948 | 57,434 | 3,959,968 |
1991 | 1,378,252 | 883,482 | 456,966 | 828,426 | 15,980 | 3,563,106 |
1992 | 1,669,537 | 1,001,833 | 469,413 | 1,018,204 | 16,849 | 4,175,836 |
1993 | 2,093,362 | 1,173,694 | 562,292 | 1,144,940 | 81,349 | 5,055,637 |
1994 | 2,004,298 | 1,316,607 | 586,450 | 1,254,926 | 10,936 | 5,173,217 |
1995 | 1,195,284 | 1,411,120 | 527,664 | 1,173,645 | 8,629 | 4,316,342 |
1996 | 987,528 | 1,424,315 | 498,944 | 925,732 | 17,920 | 3,854,439 |
1997 | 1,036,077 | 1,251,341 | 370,428 | 915,978 | 19,680 | 3,593,504 |
1998 | 960,365 | 1,535,690 | 324,390 | 868,639 | 24,506 | 3,713,590 |
1999 | 995,446 | 1,569,685 | 335,784 | 1,106,995 | 39,837 | 4,047,747 |
2000 | 962,901 | 1,583,042 | 318,960 | 898,442 | 30,196 | 3,793,541 |
2001 | 626,836 | 1,284,554 | 320,143 | 679,813 | 21,309 | 2,932,655 |
2002 | 741,514 | 1,515,286 | 347,070 | 741,325 | 21,700 | 3,366,895 |
2003 | 811,660 | 1,430,324 | 309,364 | 726,078 | 30,978 | 3,308,404 |
2004 | 728,511 | 1,325,138 | 294,099 | 731,769 | 19,508 | 3,099,025 |
2005 | 803,425 | 1,431,372 | 274,205 | 709,313 | 23,179 | 3,241,494 |
2006 | 1,021,260 | 1,496,505 | 385,069 | 714,618 | 35,872 | 3,653,324 |
2007 | 1,219,664 | 1,610,923 | 391,334 | 645,231 | 55,461 | 3,922,613 |
2008 | 1,609,381 | 1,734,536 | 431,753 | 630,710 | 92,564 | 4,498,944 |
2009 | 1,868,258 | 2,248,851 | 547,195 | 752,699 | 138,815 | 5,555,818 |
2010 | 2,258,450 | 1,830,556 | 558,927 | 743,378 | 67,929 | 5,459,240 |
2011 | 2,598,133 | 2,318,088 | 572,857 | 862,401 | 190,407 | 6,541,886 |
2012 | 3,487,883 | 3,168,206 | 667,357 | 949,010 | 306,154 | 8,578,610 |
2013 | 4,441,726 | 3,979,570 | 725,282 | 1,203,072 | 495,142 | 10,844,792 |
2014 | 3,633,454 | 3,379,549 | 744,047 | 935,411 | 358,165 | 9,050,626 |
2015 | 3,557,199 | 3,691,799 | 885,259 | 777,273 | 447,131 | 9,358,661 |
2016 | 4,720,075 | 4,239,335 | 856,291 | 848,617 | 833,123 | 11,497,441 |
2017 | 3,691,010 | 2,504,092 | 720,917 | 653,139 | 758,634 | 8,327,792 |
2018 | 3,881,158 | 2,880,536 | 664,835 | 536,126 | 1,089,973 | 9,052,628 |
2019 | 3,046,013 | 1,957,667 | 580,601 | 480,735 | 946,929 | 7,011,945 |
Total | 60,804,840 | 59,796,760 | 15,826,964 | 26,241,134 | 6,298,415 | 168,968,113 |
Pistols (36%) and rifles (35%) are the dominant categories, and over time, the former has become the most commonly produced firearm type.
In 2001, pistols accounted for 21% of firearms produced. Today, nearly half of all firearms produced are pistols.
Who is Producing America’s Firearms?
There are a wide variety of firearm manufacturing companies in the U.S., but production is dominated by a few key players.
Here are the top 10 gunmakers in America, which collectively make up 70% of production:
Rank | Firearm Manufacturer | Guns Produced (2016-2020) | Share of total |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Smith & Wesson Corp | 8,218,199 | 17.2% |
2 | Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc | 8,166,448 | 17.1% |
3 | Sig Sauer Inc | 3,660,629 | 7.7% |
4 | Freedom Group | 3,045,427 | 6.4% |
5 | 0 F Mossberg & Sons Inc | 2,223,241 | 4.7% |
6 | Taurus International Manufacturing | 1,996,121 | 4.2% |
7 | WM C Anderson Inc | 1,816,625 | 3.8% |
8 | Glock Inc | 1,510,437 | 3.2% |
9 | Henry RAC Holding Corp | 1,378,544 | 2.9% |
10 | JIE Capital Holdings / Enterprises | 1,258,969 | 2.6% |
Total | 33,274,640 | 69.7% |
One-third of production comes from two publicly-traded parent companies: Smith & Wesson (NYSE: RGR), and Sturm, Ruger & Co. (NASDAQ: SWBI)
Some of these players are especially dominant within certain types of firearms. For example:
- 58% of pistols were made by Smith & Wesson, Ruger, and SIG SAUER (2008–2018)
- 45% of rifles were made by Remington*, Ruger, and Smith & Wesson (2008–2018)
*In 2020, Remington filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, and its assets were divided and sold to various buyers. The Remington brand name is now owned by Vista Outdoor (NYSE: VSTO)
The Geography of Gun Manufacturing
Companies that manufacture guns hold a Type 07 license from the ATF. As of 2020, there are more than 16,000 Type 07 licensees across the United States.
Below is a state-level look at where the country’s licensees are located:
State | Licenses (2000) | Licenses (2020) | Population | Licenses per 100,000 pop. (2020) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alaska | 8 | 117 | 733,391 | 16.0 |
Alabama | 40 | 276 | 5,039,877 | 5.5 |
Arkansas | 28 | 302 | 3,011,524 | 10.0 |
Arizona | 100 | 959 | 7,276,316 | 13.2 |
California | 159 | 620 | 39,237,836 | 1.6 |
Colorado | 27 | 481 | 5,812,069 | 8.3 |
Connecticut | 71 | 194 | 3,605,944 | 5.4 |
Delaware | 0 | 10 | 989,948 | 1.0 |
Florida | 131 | 1,009 | 21,781,128 | 4.6 |
Georgia | 52 | 510 | 10,799,566 | 4.7 |
Hawaii | 0 | 11 | 1,455,271 | 0.8 |
Iowa | 11 | 187 | 3,190,369 | 5.9 |
Idaho | 38 | 358 | 1,839,106 | 19.5 |
Illinois | 40 | 263 | 12,671,469 | 2.1 |
Indiana | 39 | 280 | 6,805,985 | 4.1 |
Kansas | 17 | 229 | 2,937,880 | 7.8 |
Kentucky | 22 | 211 | 4,505,836 | 4.7 |
Louisiana | 20 | 258 | 4,657,757 | 5.5 |
Massachusetts | 67 | 263 | 6,984,723 | 3.8 |
Maryland | 36 | 146 | 6,165,129 | 2.4 |
Maine | 13 | 107 | 1,362,359 | 7.9 |
Michigan | 43 | 386 | 10,050,811 | 3.8 |
Minnesota | 63 | 254 | 5,707,390 | 4.5 |
Missouri | 62 | 401 | 6,168,187 | 6.5 |
Mississippi | 12 | 190 | 2,961,279 | 6.4 |
Montana | 24 | 240 | 1,084,225 | 22.1 |
North Carolina | 52 | 628 | 10,551,162 | 6.0 |
North Dakota | 3 | 46 | 779,094 | 5.9 |
Nebraska | 15 | 91 | 1,961,504 | 4.6 |
New Hampshire | 25 | 188 | 1,377,529 | 13.6 |
New Jersey | 10 | 26 | 9,267,130 | 0.3 |
New Mexico | 18 | 179 | 2,117,522 | 8.5 |
Nevada | 45 | 276 | 3,104,614 | 8.9 |
New York | 35 | 299 | 19,835,913 | 1.5 |
Ohio | 80 | 644 | 11,780,017 | 5.5 |
Oklahoma | 37 | 423 | 3,959,353 | 10.7 |
Oregon | 55 | 226 | 4,237,256 | 5.3 |
Pennsylvania | 87 | 519 | 12,964,056 | 4.0 |
Rhode Island | 1 | 20 | 1,097,379 | 1.8 |
South Carolina | 25 | 284 | 5,190,705 | 5.5 |
South Dakota | 14 | 79 | 886,667 | 8.9 |
Tennessee | 76 | 352 | 6,975,218 | 5.0 |
Texas | 150 | 2,022 | 29,527,941 | 6.8 |
Utah | 33 | 478 | 3,271,616 | 14.6 |
Virginia | 48 | 412 | 8,642,274 | 4.8 |
Vermont | 15 | 85 | 643,077 | 13.2 |
Washington | 49 | 351 | 7,738,692 | 4.5 |
Wisconsin | 38 | 306 | 5,895,908 | 5.2 |
West Virginia | 20 | 115 | 1,793,716 | 6.4 |
Wyoming | 20 | 147 | 576,851 | 25.5 |
These manufacturers are located all around the country, so these numbers are somewhat reflective of population. Unsurprisingly, large states like Texas and Florida have the most licensees.
Sorting by the number of licensees per 100,000 people offers a different point of view. By this measure, Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho come out on top.
If recent sales and production trends are any indication, these numbers may only continue to grow.
War
What Weapons are Banned or Restricted in War?
This infographic covers the various types of weapons that are restricted or prohibited in war, according to international humanitarian laws.

What Weapons Are Banned or Restricted in War?
For thousands of years, there have been rules to control the types of weapons in warfare—for instance, the use of poison in armed combat was forbidden in Ancient Greece.
But it wasn’t until the 19th century that international agreements were made to legally regulate the types of weapons that are allowed (and banned) in wars around the world.
This graphic outlines the weapons that are banned or limited in war, according to international humanitarian laws that are outlined in the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW).
CCW and The Five Protocols
The CCW, also known as the Inhumane Weapons Convention, is an international agreement that restricts the use of weapons that have been deemed unnecessarily cruel and inhumane.
Currently, there are 125 State Parties involved in the agreement, with signatures from an additional four states. In the CCW, there are five protocols outlined that restrict or limit the use of the following weapons:
- Non-detectable fragments: weapons specially designed to shatter into tiny pieces, which aren’t detectable in the human body. Examples are fragmented bullets or projectiles filled with broken glass.
- Mines, booby traps, and other devices: This includes anti-personnel mines, which are mines specially designed to target humans rather than tanks.
- Incendiary weapons: Weapons that cause fires aren’t permitted for use on on civilian populations or in forested areas.
- Blinding lasers: Laser weapons specifically designed to cause permanent blindness.
- Explosive remnants of war: Parties that have used cluster bombs in combat are required to help clear any unexploded remains.
It’s worth flagging that, under the CCW, the use of cluster bombs is not outright banned. However, their use and production is prohibited under separate legislation called the Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM).
At this time, the CCW does not have enforcement processes in place, or systems to resolve any breaches of the agreement.
The Chemical Weapons Convention
Another international treaty that aims to limit the use of unnecessarily dangerous weapons is the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which prohibits the creation, acquisition, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons by State Parties.
193 State Parties have signed the CWC, and one more state (Israel) has technically signed the agreement but hasn’t yet made it official.
Syria signed the agreement back in 2013, but according to reports from UN human rights investigators, the Syrian government has used chemical weapons on numerous occasions throughout its ongoing civil war.
Is Russia Using Prohibited Weapons in Ukraine?
In the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it’s been reported that Russia’s been using several weapons that are banned by international legislation, including cluster bombs and explosive weapons. Harvard Law expert Bonnie Docherty explains why these weapons are so dangerous:
- They scatter submunitions over vast areas of land, meaning they can hit unintended targets
- Many don’t explode and end up laying dormant for years
According to reports from Human Rights Watch, Russia has been using cluster bombs in several areas of Ukraine, such as the heavily populated city of Mykolaiv, and in Solyani, a suburban area just outside of Mykolaiv.
AI in Weapons and Warfare
Over the last few decades, certain protocols and restrictions in the CCW have been amended and changed based on societal changes and technological improvements.
So, as military weapons continue to improve, and technology like commercial drones become more common, proper legislation around drone use in warfare may be necessary.
Currently, there is no international legislation that bans the use of drones in war. However, several global defense companies are popping up to try and find ways to counter these new military technologies. In fact, the global addressable market for counter drones and tracking systems is estimated at $10 billion worldwide.
-
Misc2 weeks ago
The Top 10 Largest Nuclear Explosions, Visualized
-
Energy3 weeks ago
Mapped: Solar and Wind Power by Country
-
Politics2 weeks ago
Mapped: The State of Global Democracy in 2022
-
Datastream4 weeks ago
Visualizing Companies with the Most Patents Granted in 2021
-
Energy1 week ago
Visualizing U.S. Crude Oil and Petroleum Product Imports in 2021
-
Technology2 weeks ago
Synthetic Biology: The $3.6 Trillion Science Changing Life as We Know It
-
Markets4 weeks ago
Why Investors Tuned Out Netflix
-
Markets1 week ago
Visualizing China’s $18 Trillion Economy in One Chart