Markets
The Best Selling Vehicles in America, By State
View the full-size infographic map

The Best Selling Vehicles in America, By State
From Ford trucks in the Midwest to Toyotas on the coasts, the best selling vehicles in America reveal a lot about the country.
Compared to other countries with fewer highways or narrower roads, the U.S. is very much a truck-friendly country. Across the U.S., the most sold vehicle in 2019 was the Ford F-Series of trucks, primarily the F-150.
As the home of the world’s pioneer automotive manufacturers, including Ford and GM, consumers primarily purchase local brands. But that hasn’t stopped Toyota, the largest foreign manufacturer in the world, from also gaining a foothold.
This graphic uses 2020 sales data from automotive information resource Edmunds.com, breaking down the best selling vehicles in each state through new vehicle retail registration.
What Are the Best Selling Vehicles in Each State?
Despite a slowdown in vehicle sales due to the COVID-19 pandemic and a global chip shortage, Americans still bought plenty of trucks last year.
In fact, 48 out of the 50 states had a truck or SUV as the top selling vehicle in 2020—and most states actually had trucks taking all of the top three spots. The only two with a car topping the leaderboard were California and Florida.
Top Selling Vehicle By State (2020) | #1 | #2 | #3 |
---|---|---|---|
Alabama | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | Toyota Camry |
Alaska | Ram 1500-3500 | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado |
Arizona | Ram 1500-3500 | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado |
Arkansas | Ram 1500-3500 | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado |
California | Honda Civic | Toyota RAV4 | Toyota Camry |
Colorado | Ford F-Series | Ram 1500-3500 | Toyota RAV4 |
Connecticut | Honda CR-V | Toyota RAV4 | Subaru Forester |
D.C. | Toyota RAV4 | Honda CR-V | Subaru Forester |
Delaware | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
Florida | Toyota Corolla | Ford F-Series | Toyota RAV4 |
Georgia | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
Hawaii | Toyota Tacoma | Toyota 4Runner | Toyota RAV4 |
Idaho | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 | Chevrolet Silverado |
Illinois | Ford F-Series | Honda CR-V | Chevrolet Silverado |
Indiana | Chevrolet Silverado | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Equinox |
Iowa | Chevrolet Silverado | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 |
Kansas | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
Kentucky | Chevrolet Silverado | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 |
Louisiana | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
Maine | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
Maryland | Toyota RAV4 | Ford F-Series | Honda CR-V |
Massachusetts | Toyota RAV4 | Honda CR-V | Ford F-Series |
Michigan | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Equinox | RAM 1500-3500 |
Minnesota | Chevrolet Silverado | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 |
Mississippi | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
Missouri | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
Montana | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 | Chevrolet Silverado |
Nebraska | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
Nevada | Ram 1500-3500 | Ford F-Series | Toyota RAV4 |
New Hampshire | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | Toyota RAV4 |
New Jersey | Honda CR-V | Honda Civic | Toyota RAV4 |
New Mexico | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 | Chevrolet Silverado |
New York | Honda CR-V | Toyota RAV4 | Jeep Cherokee |
North Carolina | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
North Dakota | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
Ohio | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 | Chevrolet Silverado |
Oklahoma | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 | Chevrolet Silverado |
Oregon | Toyota RAV4 | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 |
Pennsylvania | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 | Honda CR-V |
Puerto Rico | Toyota RAV4 | Toyota Yaris | Toyota Corolla |
Rhode Island | Toyota RAV4 | Honda CR-V | Ford F-Series |
South Carolina | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
South Dakota | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 | Chevrolet Silverado |
Tennessee | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
Texas | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | RAM 1500-3500 |
Utah | Ford F-Series | RAM 1500-3500 | Chevrolet Silverado |
Vermont | Ford F-Series | Toyota RAV4 | RAM 1500-3500 |
Virginia | Ford F-Series | Toyota RAV4 | Honda CR-V |
Washington | Toyota RAV4 | Ford F-Series | Ram 1500-3500 |
West Virginia | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | Ram 1500-3500 |
Wisconsin | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado | Ram 1500-3500 |
Wyoming | Ram 1500-3500 | Ford F-Series | Chevrolet Silverado |
The Ford F-Series was the clear leader in sales, primarily in the Midwest. With a top-selling spot in 60% of U.S. states, the F-Series was the best selling vehicle in America.
Combined with the Chevrolet Silverado and Ram 1500-3500 series, the big three American truck brands accounted for 73% of the top three selling vehicles across all American states and territories.
Japanese Automakers in the Mix
Though American manufacturers had the best selling cars in most states, they had some overseas competition.
Japanese manufacturers Toyota and Honda had the top-selling vehicle in 11 states (and D.C.). They primarily captured car sales along the coastlines, including in California, Florida, New York and Washington, some of the most populated states in the country.
America's Best Selling Vehicles (2020) | Type | # Times in Top 3 |
---|---|---|
Ford F-Series | Truck | 45 |
Ram 1500-3500 | Truck | 36 |
Chevrolet Silverado | Truck | 33 |
Toyota RAV4 | SUV | 18 |
Honda CR-V | SUV | 10 |
Chevrolet Equinox | SUV | 2 |
Honda Civic | Car | 2 |
Subaru Forester | SUV | 2 |
Toyota Camry | Car | 2 |
Toyota Corolla | Car | 2 |
Jeep Cherokee | SUV | 1 |
Toyota 4Runner | SUV | 1 |
Toyota Tacoma | Truck | 1 |
Toyota Yaris | Car | 1 |
Despite many cars being available for sale in the U.S., only seven manufacturers made the top-selling vehicles list in 2020.
- Ford
- Ram
- Chevrolet
- Toyota
- Honda
- Subaru
- Jeep
With the full effects of the COVID-19 pandemic yet to be reflected in the sales, and electric vehicle manufacturers like Tesla on the rise, how will the best selling vehicles in America evolve?
Markets
Charted: U.S. Consumer Debt Approaches $16 Trillion
Robust growth in mortgages has pushed U.S. consumer debt to nearly $16 trillion. Click to gain further insight into the situation.

Charted: U.S. Consumer Debt Approaches $16 Trillion
According to the Federal Reserve (Fed), U.S. consumer debt is approaching a record-breaking $16 trillion. Critically, the rate of increase in consumer debt for the fourth quarter of 2021 was also the highest seen since 2007.
This graphic provides context into the consumer debt situation using data from the end of 2021.
Housing Vs. Non-Housing Debt
The following table includes the data used in the above graphic. Housing debt covers mortgages, while non-housing debt covers auto loans, student loans, and credit card balances.
Date | Housing Debt (USD trillions) | Non-Housing Debt (USD trillions) | Total Consumer Debt (USD trillions) |
---|---|---|---|
Q1 2003 | 5.18 | 2.05 | 7.23 |
Q2 2003 | 5.34 | 2.04 | 7.38 |
Q3 2003 | 5.45 | 2.10 | 7.55 |
Q4 2003 | 5.96 | 2.10 | 8.06 |
Q1 2004 | 6.17 | 2.13 | 8.30 |
Q2 2004 | 6.34 | 2.12 | 8.46 |
Q3 2004 | 6.64 | 2.20 | 8.84 |
Q4 2004 | 6.83 | 2.22 | 9.05 |
Q1 2005 | 7.01 | 2.19 | 9.20 |
Q2 2005 | 7.23 | 2.26 | 9.49 |
Q3 2005 | 7.45 | 2.35 | 9.80 |
Q4 2005 | 7.67 | 2.34 | 10.01 |
Q1 2006 | 8.02 | 2.36 | 10.38 |
Q2 2006 | 8.35 | 2.40 | 10.75 |
Q3 2006 | 8.65 | 2.46 | 11.11 |
Q4 2006 | 8.83 | 2.48 | 11.31 |
Q1 2007 | 9.03 | 2.46 | 11.49 |
Q2 2007 | 9.33 | 2.53 | 11.86 |
Q3 2007 | 9.56 | 2.58 | 12.14 |
Q4 2007 | 9.75 | 2.63 | 12.38 |
Q1 2008 | 9.89 | 2.65 | 12.54 |
Q2 2008 | 9.95 | 2.65 | 12.60 |
Q3 2008 | 9.98 | 2.69 | 12.67 |
Q4 2008 | 9.97 | 2.71 | 12.68 |
Q1 2009 | 9.85 | 2.68 | 12.53 |
Q2 2009 | 9.77 | 2.63 | 12.40 |
Q3 2009 | 9.65 | 2.62 | 12.27 |
Q4 2009 | 9.55 | 2.62 | 12.17 |
Q1 2010 | 9.53 | 2.58 | 12.11 |
Q2 2010 | 9.38 | 2.55 | 11.93 |
Q3 2010 | 9.28 | 2.56 | 11.84 |
Q4 2010 | 9.12 | 2.59 | 11.71 |
Q1 2011 | 9.18 | 2.58 | 11.76 |
Q2 2011 | 9.14 | 2.58 | 11.72 |
Q3 2011 | 9.04 | 2.62 | 11.66 |
Q4 2011 | 8.90 | 2.63 | 11.53 |
Q1 2012 | 8.80 | 2.64 | 11.44 |
Q2 2012 | 8.74 | 2.64 | 11.38 |
Q3 2012 | 8.60 | 2.71 | 11.31 |
Q4 2012 | 8.59 | 2.75 | 11.34 |
Q1 2013 | 8.48 | 2.75 | 11.23 |
Q2 2013 | 8.38 | 2.77 | 11.15 |
Q3 2013 | 8.44 | 2.85 | 11.29 |
Q4 2013 | 8.58 | 2.94 | 11.52 |
Q1 2014 | 8.70 | 2.96 | 11.66 |
Q2 2014 | 8.62 | 3.02 | 11.64 |
Q3 2014 | 8.64 | 3.07 | 11.71 |
Q4 2014 | 8.68 | 3.16 | 11.84 |
Q1 2015 | 8.68 | 3.17 | 11.85 |
Q2 2015 | 8.62 | 3.24 | 11.86 |
Q3 2015 | 8.75 | 3.31 | 12.06 |
Q4 2015 | 8.74 | 3.37 | 12.11 |
Q1 2016 | 8.86 | 3.39 | 12.25 |
Q2 2016 | 8.84 | 3.45 | 12.29 |
Q3 2016 | 8.82 | 3.54 | 12.36 |
Q4 2016 | 8.95 | 3.63 | 12.58 |
Q1 2017 | 9.09 | 3.64 | 12.73 |
Q2 2017 | 9.14 | 3.69 | 12.83 |
Q3 2017 | 9.19 | 3.77 | 12.96 |
Q4 2017 | 9.32 | 3.82 | 13.14 |
Q1 2018 | 9.38 | 3.85 | 13.23 |
Q2 2018 | 9.43 | 3.87 | 13.30 |
Q3 2018 | 9.56 | 3.95 | 13.51 |
Q4 2018 | 9.53 | 4.01 | 13.54 |
Q1 2019 | 9.65 | 4.02 | 13.67 |
Q2 2019 | 9.81 | 4.06 | 13.87 |
Q3 2019 | 9.84 | 4.13 | 13.97 |
Q4 2019 | 9.95 | 4.20 | 14.15 |
Q1 2020 | 10.10 | 4.21 | 14.31 |
Q2 2020 | 10.15 | 4.12 | 14.27 |
Q3 2020 | 10.22 | 4.14 | 14.36 |
Q4 2020 | 10.39 | 4.17 | 14.56 |
Q1 2021 | 10.50 | 4.14 | 14.64 |
Q2 2021 | 10.76 | 4.20 | 14.96 |
Q3 2021 | 10.99 | 4.24 | 15.23 |
Q4 2021 | 11.25 | 4.34 | 15.59 |
Source: Federal Reserve
Trends in Housing Debt
Home prices have experienced upward pressure since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is evidenced by the Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index, which has increased by 34% since the start of the pandemic.
Driving this growth are various pandemic-related impacts. For example, the cost of materials such as lumber have seen enormous spikes. We’ve covered this story in a previous graphic, which showed how many homes could be built with $50,000 worth of lumber. In most cases, these higher costs are passed on to the consumer.
Another key factor here is mortgage rates, which fell to all-time lows in 2020. When rates are low, consumers are able to borrow in larger quantities. This increases the demand for homes, which in turn inflates prices.
Ultimately, higher home prices translate to more mortgage debt being incurred by families.
No Need to Worry, Though
Economists believe that today’s housing debt isn’t a cause for concern. This is because the quality of borrowers is much stronger than it was between 2003 and 2007, in the years leading up to the financial crisis and subsequent housing crash.
In the chart below, subprime borrowers (those with a credit score of 620 and below) are represented by the red-shaded bars:
We can see that subprime borrowers represent very little (2%) of today’s total originations compared to the period between 2003 to 2007 (12%). This suggests that American homeowners are, on average, less likely to default on their mortgage.
Economists have also noted a decline in the household debt service ratio, which measures the percentage of disposable income that goes towards a mortgage. This is shown in the table below, along with the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate.
Year | Mortgage Payments as a % of Disposable Income | Average 30-Year Fixed Mortgage Rate |
---|---|---|
2000 | 12.0% | 8.2% |
2004 | 12.2% | 5.4% |
2008 | 12.8% | 5.8% |
2012 | 9.8% | 3.9% |
2016 | 9.9% | 3.7% |
2020 | 9.4% | 3.5% |
2021 | 9.3% | 3.2% |
Source: Federal Reserve
While it’s true that Americans are less burdened by their mortgages, we must acknowledge the decrease in mortgage rates that took place over the same period.
With the Fed now increasing rates to calm inflation, Americans could see their mortgages begin to eat up a larger chunk of their paycheck. In fact, mortgage rates have already risen for seven consecutive weeks.
Trends in Non-Housing Consumer Debt
The key stories in non-housing consumer debt are student loans and auto loans.
The former category of debt has grown substantially over the past two decades, with growth tapering off during the pandemic. This can be attributed to COVID relief measures which have temporarily lowered the interest rate on direct federal student loans to 0%.
Additionally, these loans were placed into forbearance, meaning 37 million borrowers have not been required to make payments. As of April 2022, the value of these waived payments has reached $195 billion.
Over the course of the pandemic, very few direct federal borrowers have made voluntary payments to reduce their loan principal. When payments eventually resume, and the 0% interest rate is reverted, economists believe that delinquencies could rise significantly.
Auto loans, on the other hand, are following a similar trajectory as mortgages. Both new and used car prices have risen due to the global chip shortage, which is hampering production across the entire industry.
To put this in numbers, the average price of a new car has climbed from $35,600 in 2019, to over $47,000 today. Over a similar timeframe, the average price of a used car has grown from $19,800, to over $28,000.
Markets
Why Investors Tuned Out Netflix
Disappointing results have pushed Netflix shares down by over 60% year-to-date. This infographic puts the company’s rocky year into perspective.

Why Investors Tuned Out Netflix
Netflix shares have enjoyed an incredible run over the past decade. Subscriber growth seemed limitless, profitability was improving, and the pandemic gave us a compelling case for watching TV at home.
Things took a drastic turn on April 19, 2022, when Netflix announced its Q1 results. Rather than gaining subscribers as forecasted, the company lost 200,000. This was the first decline in over a decade, and investors rushed to pull their money out.
So, is there a buying opportunity now that Netflix shares are trading at multi-year lows? To help you decide, we’ve provided further context around this historic crash.
Netflix Shares Fall Flat
Over the span of a few months, Netflix shares have erased roughly four years worth of gains. Not all of these losses are due to the drop in subscribers, however.
Prior to the Q1 earnings announcement, Netflix had lost most of its pandemic-related gains. This was primarily due to rising interest rates and people spending less time at home. Still, analysts expected Netflix to add 2.7 million subscribers.
After announcing it had lost 200,000 subscribers instead, the stock quickly fell below $200 (the first time since late 2017). YTD performance (as of April 29, 2022) is an abysmal -67%.
What’s to Blame?
Netflix pointed to three culprits for its loss in subscribers:
- The suspension of its services in Russia
- Increasing competition
- Account sharing
Let’s focus on the latter two, starting with competition. The following table compares the number of subscribers between Netflix and two prominent rivals: Disney+ and HBO.
Date | Netflix Subscribers | Disney+ Subscribers | HBO & HBO Max Subscribers |
---|---|---|---|
Q1 2020 | 182.8M | 26.5M | 53.8M |
Q2 2020 | 192.9M | 33.5M | 55.5M |
Q3 2020 | 195.1M | 60.5M | 56.9M |
Q4 2020 | 203.6M | 73.7M | 60.6M |
Q1 2021 | 207.6M | 94.9M | 63.9M |
Q2 2021 | 209.2M | 103.6M | 67.5M |
Q3 2021 | 213.6M | 116.0M | 69.4M |
Q4 2021 | 221.8M | 118.1M | 73.8M |
Q1 2022 | 221.6M | 129.8M | 76.8M |
Disney+ was launched in November 2019, while HBO Max was launched in May 2020. HBO (the channel) and HBO Max subscribers are rolled up as one.
Based on this data, Netflix may be starting to feel the heat of competition. A loss in subscribers is bad news, but it’s even worse when competitors report growth over the same time period.
Keep in mind that we’re only talking about a single quarter, and not a long-term trend. It’s too early to say whether Netflix is actually losing ground, though the company has warned it could shed another 2 million subscribers by July.
Next is account sharing, which according to Netflix, amounts to 100 million non-paying households. This is spread out across the entire world, but if we use the company’s U.S. pricing as a benchmark, it translates to between $1 to $2 billion in lost revenue.
Growth is Everything
In the tech sector, growth is everything. If Netflix can’t return to posting consecutive quarters of subscriber growth, it could be many years before the stock returns to its previous high.
“We’ve definitely seen that once you get to 70, 80 millions of subs, things really tend to slow down. We saw it with HBO, and we’ve seen the same issues with Disney. They’re hitting the upper limit on the big growth.”
– David Campo, NYU
Regaining that momentum is going to be difficult, but Netflix does have plans. To address password sharing, the service may charge a fee for out-of-household profiles that are added to an account. The specifics around enforcement are vague, but Netflix is also considering a lower-priced subscription plan that includes advertising.
Only time will tell if these strategies can stop the bleeding, or perhaps even boost profitability. Rampant inflation, which might persuade consumers to cut down on their subscriptions, could be a source of additional headwinds.
-
Technology3 weeks ago
How Do Big Tech Giants Make Their Billions?
-
Misc3 days ago
The Top 10 Largest Nuclear Explosions, Visualized
-
Green4 weeks ago
Visualizing All Electric Car Models Available in the U.S.
-
Markets4 weeks ago
Satellite Maps: Shanghai’s Supply Chain Standstill
-
Energy1 week ago
Mapped: Solar and Wind Power by Country
-
Datastream3 weeks ago
Visualizing Companies with the Most Patents Granted in 2021
-
Markets2 weeks ago
Why Investors Tuned Out Netflix
-
Automotive2 weeks ago
Timeline: The Rise, Fall, and Return of the Hummer