Money
Visualized: The State of Central Bank Digital Currencies
Visualized: The State of Central Bank Digital Currencies
Central banks around the world are getting involved in digital currencies, but some are further ahead than others.
In this map, we used data from the Atlantic Council’s Currency Tracker to visualize the state of each central banks’ digital currency effort.
Digital Currency – The Basics
Digital currencies have been around since the 1980s, but didn’t become widely popular until the launch of Bitcoin in 2009. Today, there are thousands of digital currencies in existence, also referred to as “cryptocurrencies”.
A defining feature of cryptocurrencies is that they are based on a blockchain ledger. Blockchains can be either decentralized or centralized, but the most known cryptocurrencies today (Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc.) tend to be decentralized in nature. This makes transfers and payments very difficult to trace because there is no single entity with full control.
Government-issued digital currencies, on the other hand, will be controlled by a central bank and are likely to be easily trackable. They would have the same value as the local cash currency, but instead issued digitally with no physical form.
Central Bank Digital Currencies Worldwide
105 countries are currently exploring centralized digital currencies. Together, they represent 95% of global GDP. The table below lists the data used in the infographic.
Country | Status | Use Case |
---|---|---|
Nigeria | Launched | Retail |
The Bahamas | Launched | Retail |
Jamaica | Launched | Retail |
Anguila | Launched | Retail |
Saint Kitts and Nevis | Launched | Retail |
Antigua and Barbuda | Launched | Retail |
Montserrat | Launched | Retail |
Dominica | Launched | Retail |
Saint Lucia | Launched | Retail |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Launched | Retail |
Grenada | Launched | Retail |
Sweden | Pilot | Retail |
Lithuania | Pilot | Retail |
Ukraine | Pilot | Undecided |
Kazakhstan | Pilot | Retail |
Russia | Pilot | Retail |
China | Pilot | Both |
Thailand | Pilot | Both |
Hong Kong | Pilot | Both |
South Korea | Pilot | Retail |
Saudi Arabia | Pilot | Wholesale |
United Arab Emirates | Pilot | Wholesale |
Singapore | Pilot | Wholesale |
Malaysia | Pilot | Wholesale |
South Africa | Pilot | Both |
Canada | Development | Both |
Belize | Development | Undecided |
Haiti | Development | Both |
Venezuela | Development | Both |
Brazil | Development | Retail |
Turkey | Development | Retail |
Iran | Development | Retail |
Bahrain | Development | Wholesale |
India | Development | Both |
Mauritius | Development | Both |
Bhutan | Development | Both |
Cambodia | Development | Retail |
Indonesia | Development | Both |
Palau | Development | Both |
Australia | Development | Both |
Japan | Development | Both |
Spain | Development | Retail |
France | Development | Both |
Netherlands | Development | Retail |
Switzerland | Development | Wholesale |
Italy | Development | Undecided |
Germany | Development | Undecided |
Estonia | Development | Retail |
Lebanon | Development | Retail |
Israel | Development | Retail |
Euro Area | Development | Both |
United States | Research | Retail |
Mexico | Research | Retail |
Guatemala | Research | Undecided |
Honduras | Research | Undecided |
Trinidad andd Tobago | Research | Undecided |
Colombia | Research | Undecided |
Peru | Research | Undecided |
Paraguay | Research | Undecided |
Chile | Research | Retail |
Iceland | Research | Retail |
UK | Research | Both |
Morocco | Research | Retail |
Ghana | Research | Retail |
Namibia | Research | Undecided |
Eswatini | Research | Both |
Madagastar | Research | Retail |
Zimbabwe | Research | Undecided |
Zambia | Research | Undecided |
Tanzania | Research | Undecided |
Rwanda | Research | Undecided |
Uganda | Research | Undecided |
Kenya | Research | Retail |
Tunisia | Research | Wholesale |
Oman | Research | Undecided |
Kuwait | Research | Retail |
Jordan | Research | Undecided |
Georgia | Research | Retail |
Belarus | Research | Undecided |
Norway | Research | Retail |
Czech Republich | Research | Undecided |
Pakistan | Research | Retail |
Nepal | Research | Undecided |
Bangladesh | Research | Undecided |
Myanmar | Research | Undecided |
Laos | Research | Both |
Vietnam | Research | Undecided |
Macau | Research | Undecided |
Taiwan | Research | Both |
Philippines | Research | Retail |
New Zealand | Research | Retail |
Vanuatu | Research | Undecided |
Fiji | Research | Undecided |
Tonga | Research | Undecided |
Palestine | Research | Retail |
Jordan | Research | Undecided |
Austria | Research | Wholesale |
Hungary | Research | Retail |
Bermuda | Inactive | Undecided |
Sint Maarten | Inactive | Retail |
Curaçao | Inactive | Retail |
Argentina | Inactive | Undecided |
Uruguay | Inactive | Retail |
Denmark | Inactive | Retail |
Azerbaijan | Inactive | Undecided |
Egypt | Inactive | Undecided |
North Korea | Inactive | Undecided |
Finland | Inactive | Retail |
Ecuador | Cancelled | Retail |
Senegal | Cancelled | Retail |
When aggregated, we can see that the majority of countries are in the research stage.
We’ve also divided the map by region to make viewing easier.
Africa
Asia
Europe
Middle East
South America
North America
What are the Benefits?
A major benefit of government-issued digital currencies is that they can improve access for underbanked people.
This is not a huge issue in developed countries like the U.S., but many people in developing nations have no access to banks and other financial services (hence the term underbanked). As the number of internet users continues to climb, digital currencies represent a sound solution.
To learn more about this topic, visit this article from Global Finance, which lists the world’s most underbanked countries in 2021.
The 9%
Just 9% of countries have launched a digital currency to date.
This includes Nigeria, which became the first African country to do so in October 2021. Half of the country’s 200 million population is believed to have no access to bank accounts.
Adoption of the eNaira (the digital version of the naira) has so far been relatively sluggish. The eNaira app has accumulated 700,000 downloads as of April 2022. That’s equal to 0.35% of the population, though not all of the downloads are users in Nigeria.
Conversely, 33.4 million Nigerians were reported to be trading or owning crypto assets, despite the Central Bank of Nigeria’s attempts to restrict usage.
Status in the U.S.
America’s central bank, the Federal Reserve, has not decided on whether it will implement a central bank digital currency (CBDC).
Our key focus is on whether and how a CBDC could improve on an already safe and efficient U.S. domestic payments system.
– Federal Reserve
To learn more, check out the Federal Reserve’s January 2022 paper on the pros and cons of CBDCs.
Central Banks
Charted: Public Trust in the Federal Reserve
Public trust in the Federal Reserve chair has hit its lowest point in 20 years. Get the details in this infographic.

The Briefing
- Gallup conducts an annual poll to gauge the U.S. public’s trust in the Federal Reserve
- After rising during the COVID-19 pandemic, public trust has fallen to a 20-year low
Charted: Public Trust in the Federal Reserve
Each year, Gallup conducts a survey of American adults on various economic topics, including the country’s central bank, the Federal Reserve.
More specifically, respondents are asked how much confidence they have in the current Fed chairman to do or recommend the right thing for the U.S. economy. We’ve visualized these results from 2001 to 2023 to see how confidence levels have changed over time.
Methodology and Results
The data used in this infographic is also listed in the table below. Percentages reflect the share of respondents that have either a “great deal” or “fair amount” of confidence.
Year | Fed chair | % Great deal or Fair amount |
---|---|---|
2023 | Jerome Powell | 36% |
2022 | Jerome Powell | 43% |
2021 | Jerome Powell | 55% |
2020 | Jerome Powell | 58% |
2019 | Jerome Powell | 50% |
2018 | Jerome Powell | 45% |
2017 | Janet Yellen | 45% |
2016 | Janet Yellen | 38% |
2015 | Janet Yellen | 42% |
2014 | Janet Yellen | 37% |
2013 | Ben Bernanke | 42% |
2012 | Ben Bernanke | 39% |
2011 | Ben Bernanke | 41% |
2010 | Ben Bernanke | 44% |
2009 | Ben Bernanke | 49% |
2008 | Ben Bernanke | 47% |
2007 | Ben Bernanke | 50% |
2006 | Ben Bernanke | 41% |
2005 | Alan Greenspan | 56% |
2004 | Alan Greenspan | 61% |
2003 | Alan Greenspan | 65% |
2002 | Alan Greenspan | 69% |
2001 | Alan Greenspan | 74% |
Data for 2023 collected April 3-25, with this statement put to respondents: “Please tell me how much confidence you have [in the Fed chair] to recommend the right thing for the economy.”
We can see that trust in the Federal Reserve has fluctuated significantly in recent years.
For example, under Alan Greenspan, trust was initially high due to the relative stability of the economy. The burst of the dotcom bubble—which some attribute to Greenspan’s easy credit policies—resulted in a sharp decline.
On the flip side, public confidence spiked during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was likely due to Jerome Powell’s decisive actions to provide support to the U.S. economy throughout the crisis.
Measures implemented by the Fed include bringing interest rates to near zero, quantitative easing (buying government bonds with newly-printed money), and emergency lending programs to businesses.
Confidence Now on the Decline
After peaking at 58%, those with a “great deal” or “fair amount” of trust in the Fed chair have tumbled to 36%, the lowest number in 20 years.
This is likely due to Powell’s hard stance on fighting post-pandemic inflation, which has involved raising interest rates at an incredible speed. While these rate hikes may be necessary, they also have many adverse effects:
- Negative impact on the stock market
- Increases the burden for those with variable-rate debts
- Makes mortgages and home buying less affordable
Higher rates have also prompted many U.S. tech companies to shrink their workforces, and have been a factor in the regional banking crisis, including the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank.
Where does this data come from?
Source: Gallup (2023)
Data Notes: Results are based on telephone interviews conducted April 3-25, 2023, with a random sample of –1,013—adults, ages 18+, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on this sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. See source for details.
-
Africa4 weeks ago
Map Explainer: Sudan
-
Mining2 weeks ago
Ranked: The World’s Biggest Steel Producers, by Country
-
Travel4 weeks ago
Visualized: The World’s Busiest Airports, by Passenger Count
-
Visual Capitalist1 week ago
Join Us For Data Creator Con 2023
-
AI4 weeks ago
Visualizing Global Attitudes Towards AI
-
Central Banks1 week ago
Charted: Public Trust in the Federal Reserve
-
Announcement4 weeks ago
Calling All Data Storytellers to Enter our Creator Program Challenge
-
Technology1 week ago
Ranked: The World’s Top 25 Websites in 2023