Visualized: The Climate Targets of Fortune 500 Companies
Connect with us

Green

Visualizing the Climate Targets of Fortune 500 Companies

Published

on

View the full-resolution version of this infographic

Fortune 500 Climate Commitments

Can I share this graphic?
Yes. Visualizations are free to share and post in their original form across the web—even for publishers. Please link back to this page and attribute Visual Capitalist.
When do I need a license?
Licenses are required for some commercial uses, translations, or layout modifications. You can even whitelabel our visualizations. Explore your options.
Interested in this piece?
Click here to license this and all other GPI visualizations and data.

Visualized: The Climate Targets of Fortune 500 Companies

View the high-resolution version of this infographic by clicking here
The Fortune Global 500 is a ranking of the world’s 500 largest companies by revenue. In 2019, this influential group employed 70 million people and generated revenues of over $33 trillion.

Given their size and influence, many of these companies are taking climate action quite seriously. For example, 30% of the group have either achieved a climate goal or are publicly committed to doing so by 2030—a significant increase from just 6% in 2016.

In this infographic, we’ve used data from Natural Capital Partners to provide a holistic view of when Fortune Global 500 companies plan to meet their stated climate goals.

Climate Action Takes Several Forms

When taking climate action, businesses have a variety of targets they can pursue. Three of the most common ones include carbon neutrality, RE100, and science based targets (SBT).

Climate target typeDescription
Carbon neutralAchieved when a company completely offsets its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
RE100Achieved when a company relies on 100% renewable energy.
Science based targets (SBT) Emissions are reduced in line with the need to keep global warming below 2ºC.

After choosing a target, businesses can also set a date for when they intend to achieve it. As the above graphic shows, many companies are targeting 2030, a year that is frequently touted as a deadline for meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement.

A fourth target known as “net zero emissions” is also used, though its exact definition tends to vary. For the purposes of this infographic, we’ve considered a commitment to net zero emissions to be the same as achieving carbon neutrality.

A Complete Overview

The following table summarizes the climate actions of Fortune Global 500 companies. Firms that made commitments without a target date have been noted in the table with a “C”.

Company NameHeadquartersCarbon Neutral (target date)RE100 (target date)SBT (target date)
Commonwealth Bank of Australia🇦🇺Australia2030
Westpac Banking🇦🇺Australia20132025
Woolworths Group🇦🇺AustraliaC
Anheuser-Busch InBev🇧🇪Belgium20252025
Banco Bradesco🇧🇷Brazil2019
Banco do Brasil🇧🇷Brazil2019
Caixa Econômica Federal🇧🇷Brazil2018
Vale🇧🇷Brazil2050
Bank of Montreal🇨🇦Canada2010
Royal Bank of Canada🇨🇦Canada2017
Toronto-Dominion Bank🇨🇦Canada2010
Lenovo Group🇨🇳China2030
Xiamen ITG Holding Group🇨🇳ChinaC
Maersk Group🇩🇰Denmark2050
Nokia🇫🇮Finland2030
Auchan Holding🇫🇷France
AXA🇫🇷France2025
BNP Paribas🇫🇷France2017
Carrefour🇫🇷France2030
CMA CGM🇫🇷France2050
Crédit Agricole🇫🇷FranceC
Danone🇫🇷France205020302030
Electricité de France🇫🇷France2050
Engie🇫🇷France2030
L'Oréal🇫🇷France20202027
La Poste🇫🇷France201220202025
Michelin🇫🇷France2030
Orange🇫🇷France2040
Renault🇫🇷France2030
Saint-Gobain🇫🇷France2025
Sanofi🇫🇷France2030
Schneider Electric🇫🇷France202520302030
Siemens🇫🇷France2030
Société Générale🇫🇷FranceC
Veolia Environnement🇫🇷France2034
Vinci🇫🇷France2050
Adidas🇩🇪Germany2050
Allianz🇩🇪Germany20122023
Bayer🇩🇪Germany2030
BMW Group🇩🇪Germany2050
Bosch Group🇩🇪Germany2020
Continental🇩🇪Germany20402030
Daimler🇩🇪Germany2039
Deutsche Bahn🇩🇪Germany20502030
Deutsche Bank🇩🇪Germany2013
Deutsche Post DHL Group🇩🇪Germany2050
Deutsche Telekom🇩🇪Germany205020212030
E.ON🇩🇪Germany2040
Metro🇩🇪Germany2030
Munich Re Group🇩🇪Germany2015
SAP🇩🇪Germany202520142025
ThyssenKrupp🇩🇪Germany2030
Uniper🇩🇪Germany2035
Volkswagen🇩🇪Germany2050
ZF Friedrichshafen🇩🇪Germany2040
State Bank of India🇮🇳India2030
Tata Motors🇮🇳India2030
Accenture🇮🇪Ireland20232025
CRH🇮🇪Ireland2050
Johnson Controls International🇮🇪IrelandC
Enel🇮🇹Italy20502030
ENI🇮🇹Italy2030
AEON🇯🇵Japan205020302027
Dai-ichi Life Holdings🇯🇵Japan2050
Daiwa House Industry🇯🇵Japan20402030
Fujitsu🇯🇵Japan20502030
Hitachi🇯🇵JapanC
Mitsubishi Electric🇯🇵Japan2030
NEC🇯🇵Japan20502030
Nissan Motor🇯🇵Japan2050
Panasonic🇯🇵Japan20502030
Sompo Holdings🇯🇵JapanC
Sony🇯🇵Japan20402020
Sumitomo Electric Industries🇯🇵Japan2050
Takeda Pharmaceutical🇯🇵Japan20192025
Tokio Marine Holdings🇯🇵Japan2011
Toshiba🇯🇵Japan
Toyota Motor🇯🇵Japan2050
América Móvil🇲🇽Mexico2050
Achmea🇳🇱Netherlands2011
Aegon🇳🇱Netherlands2016
Heineken Holding🇳🇱NetherlandsC
ING Group🇳🇱Netherlands20072020
Equinor🇳🇴Norway2030
Anglo American🇿🇦South Africa2040
Hyundai Motor🇰🇷South Korea2050
LG Electronics🇰🇷South Korea2030
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria🇪🇸Spain20202030
Banco Santander🇪🇸Spain2020
Iberdrola🇪🇸Spain20502030
Inditex🇪🇸SpainC
Mapfre Group🇪🇸Spain2030
Naturgy Energy Group🇪🇸SpainC
Telefónica🇪🇸Spain203020302025
Volvo🇸🇪Sweden2025
ABB🇨🇭Switzerland2018
Adecco Group🇨🇭Switzerland2030
Coop Group🇨🇭Switzerland2023
Credit Suisse Group🇨🇭Switzerland20102025
LafargeHolcim🇨🇭Switzerland2030
Migros Group🇨🇭SwitzerlandC
Nestlé🇨🇭Switzerland2020
Novartis🇨🇭Switzerland20252030
Swiss Re🇨🇭Switzerland20032020
Zurich Insurance Group🇨🇭Switzerland20142022
Fubon Financial Holding🇹🇼TaiwanC
PTT🇹🇭ThailandC
Aviva🇬🇧UK20062025
Barclays🇬🇧UK2030
British American Tobacco🇬🇧UK20302028
BT Group🇬🇧UK20202030
Compass Group🇬🇧UKC
GlaxoSmithKline🇬🇧UK20502027
HSBC Holdings🇬🇧UK2030
J. Sainsbury🇬🇧UK2040
Linde🇬🇧UKC
Phoenix Group Holdings🇬🇧UK2030
Tesco🇬🇧UK205020302027
Unilever🇬🇧UK20202030
Vodafone Group🇬🇧UK2025
3M🇺🇸USA2050
Alphabet🇺🇸USA20072017
Amazon.com🇺🇸USA204020252040
American Express🇺🇸USA2018
Anthem🇺🇸USA2025
Apple🇺🇸USA20202020
AT&T🇺🇸USA2028
Bank of America🇺🇸USA20202020
Best Buy🇺🇸USA20502030
Capital One Financial🇺🇸USA20182019
Cisco Systems🇺🇸USA2022
Citigroup🇺🇸USA2020
Coca-Cola🇺🇸USA2030
CVS Health🇺🇸USA2028
Dell Technologies🇺🇸USA20402020
Delta Air Lines🇺🇸USA2020
Dow🇺🇸USA2050
Facebook🇺🇸USA2020
Ford Motor🇺🇸USA2050
General Motors🇺🇸USA2050
Goldman Sachs Group🇺🇸USA20152020
Hewlett Packard Enterprise🇺🇸USA2025
HP🇺🇸USA20352025
Intel🇺🇸USA2030
Johnson & Johnson🇺🇸USA2050
JPMorgan Chase🇺🇸USA2020
Lowe's🇺🇸USA2025
MetLife🇺🇸USA2016
Microsoft🇺🇸USA201220172030
Mondelez International🇺🇸USA2025
Morgan Stanley🇺🇸USA20222022
Nike🇺🇸USA20252030
PepsiCo🇺🇸USA2030
Pfizer🇺🇸USA2020
Philip Morris International🇺🇸USA20502030
Procter & Gamble🇺🇸USA203020302030
Schlumberger🇺🇸USAC
Starbucks🇺🇸USA2020
Target🇺🇸USA20302028
Tyson Foods🇺🇸USA2030
Verizon Communications🇺🇸USA2035
Walmart🇺🇸USA20252027
Wells Fargo🇺🇸USA20192020

Note: This data was aggregated from various sources throughout 2020, and as a result, may not include the latest climate commitments announced by companies within the Fortune Global 500.

As of October 2020, 163 companies from the Fortune Global 500 have publicly committed to achieving at least one of these climate targets. That represents 32.6% of the total group.

The most common target is carbon neutrality, which has 91 companies on board. In second place is science based targets (SBT), which has 74 companies committed—of those, 16 have not declared a target date. RE100 was the least common, with 56 companies committed. Because some companies are committed to multiple targets, these figures add to more than 163.

Climate Action is on the Rise

Private-sector awareness around climate change and other sustainability issues has gained strong momentum in recent years.

Since 2011, the number of S&P 500 companies publishing sustainability reports increased from 20% in 2011, to 90% in 2019. This was likely due to investor demand and a broader acceptance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria.

Governments around the world are also taking a more proactive approach to climate action. The Biden administration, for example, seeks to make a $2 trillion investment to help a variety of U.S. industries become more sustainable.

“We have the opportunity to build a more resilient, sustainable economy – one that will put the United States on an irreversible path to achieve net-zero emissions…by no later than 2050.”
– Biden-Harris campaign

America’s goal of reaching net-zero emissions by 2050 is shared with a handful of other advanced economies, including Japan and the EU. The UK has taken these pledges one step further, becoming the first G7 country to pass a law that requires itself to bring emissions to net zero by 2050.

Click for Comments

Technology

Synthetic Biology: The $3.6 Trillion Science Changing Life as We Know It

The field of synthetic biology could solve problems in a wide range of industries, from medicine to agriculture—here’s how.

Published

on

How Synthetic Biology Could Change Life as we Know it

Synthetic biology (synbio) is a field of science that redesigns organisms in an effort to enhance and support human life. According to one projection, this rapidly growing field of science is expected to reach $28.8 billion in global revenue by 2026.

Although it has the potential to transform many aspects of society, things could go horribly wrong if synbio is used for malicious or unethical reasons. This infographic explores the opportunities and potential risks that this budding field of science has to offer.

What is Synthetic Biology?

We’ve covered the basics of synbio in previous work, but as a refresher, here’s a quick explanation of what synbio is and how it works.

Synbio is an area of scientific research that involves editing and redesigning different biological components and systems in various organisms.

It’s like genetic engineering but done at a more granular level—while genetic engineering transfers ready-made genetic material between organisms, synbio can build new genetic material from scratch.

The Opportunities of Synbio

This field of science has a plethora of real-world applications that could transform our everyday lives. A study by McKinsey found over 400 potential uses for synbio, which were broken down into four main categories:

  • Human health and performance
  • Agriculture and food
  • Consumer products and services
  • Materials and energy production

If those potential uses become reality in the coming years, they could have a direct economic impact of up to $3.6 trillion per year by 2030-2040.

1. Human Health and Performance

The medical and health sector is predicted to be significantly influenced by synbio, with an economic impact of up to $1.3 trillion each year by 2030-2040.

Synbio has a wide range of medical applications. For instance, it can be used to manipulate biological pathways in yeast to produce an anti-malaria treatment.

It could also enhance gene therapy. Using synbio techniques, the British biotech company Touchlight Genetics is working on a way to build synthetic DNA without the use of bacteria, which would be a game-changer for the field of gene therapy.

2. Agriculture and Food

Synbio has the potential to make a big splash in the agricultural sector as well—up to $1.2 trillion per year by as early as 2030.

One example of this is synbio’s role in cellular agriculture, which is when meat is created from cells directly. The cost of creating lab-grown meat has decreased significantly in recent years, and because of this, various startups around the world are beginning to develop a variety of cell-based meat products.

3. Consumer Products and Services

Using synthetic biology, products could be tailored to suit an individual’s unique needs. This would be useful in fields such as genetic ancestry testing, gene therapy, and age-related skin procedures.

By 2030-2040, synthetic biology could have an economic impact on consumer products and services to the tune of up to $800 billion per year.

4. Materials and Energy Production

Synbio could also be used to boost efficiency in clean energy and biofuel production. For instance, microalgae are currently being “reprogrammed” to produce clean energy in an economically feasible way.

This, along with other material and energy improvements through synbio methods, could have a direct economic impact of up to $300 billion each year.

The Potential Risks of Synbio

While the potential economic and societal benefits of synthetic biology are vast, there are a number of risks to be aware of as well:

  • Unintended biological consequences: Making tweaks to any biological system can have ripple effects across entire ecosystems or species. When any sort of lifeform is manipulated, things don’t always go according to plan.
  • Moral issues: How far we’re comfortable going with synbio depends on our values. Certain synbio applications, such as embryo editing, are controversial. If these types of applications become mainstream, they could have massive societal implications, with the potential to increase polarization within communities.
  • Unequal access: Innovation and progress in synbio is happening faster in wealthier countries than it is in developing ones. If this trend continues, access to these types of technology may not be equal worldwide. We’ve already witnessed this type of access gap during the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, where a majority of vaccines have been administered in rich countries.
  • Bioweaponry: Synbio could be used to recreate viruses, or manipulate bacteria to make it more dangerous, if used with ill intent.

According to a group of scientists at the University of Edinburgh, communication between the public, synthetic biologists, and political decision-makers is crucial so that these societal and environmental risks can be mitigated.

Balancing Risk and Reward

Despite the risks involved, innovation in synbio is happening at a rapid pace.

By 2030, most people will have likely eaten, worn, or been treated by a product created by synthetic biology, according to synthetic biologist Christopher A. Voigt.

Our choices today will dictate the future of synbio, and how we navigate through this space will have a massive impact on our future—for better, or for worse.

Continue Reading

Energy

How Far Are We From Phasing Out Coal?

In 2021 coal-fired electricity generation reached all-time highs, rising 9% from the year prior. Here’s what it’d take to phase it out of the energy mix.

Published

on

How Far Are We From Phasing Out Coal?

This was originally posted on Elements. Sign up to the free mailing list to get beautiful visualizations on natural resource megatrends in your email every week.

At the COP26 conference last year, 40 nations agreed to phase coal out of their energy mixes.

Despite this, in 2021, coal-fired electricity generation reached all-time highs globally, showing that eliminating coal from the energy mix will not be a simple task.

This infographic shows the aggressive phase-out of coal power that would be required in order to reach net zero goals by 2050, based on an analysis by Ember that uses data provided by the International Energy Agency (IEA).

Low-Cost Comes at a High Environmental Cost

Coal-powered electricity generation rose by 9.0% in 2021 to 10,042 Terawatt-hours (TWh), marking the biggest percentage rise since 1985.

The main reason is cost. Coal is the world’s most affordable energy fuel. Unfortunately, low-cost energy comes at a high cost for the environment, with coal being the largest source of energy-related CO2 emissions.

China has the highest coal consumption, making up 54% of the world’s coal electricity generation. The country’s consumption jumped 12% between 2010 and 2020, despite coal making up a lower percentage of the country’s energy mix in relative terms.

Top Consumers2020 Consumption (Exajoules) Share of global consumption
China 🇨🇳82.354.3%
India 🇮🇳17.511.6%
United States 🇺🇸9.26.1%
Japan 🇯🇵4.63.0%
South Africa 🇿🇦3.52.3%
Russia 🇷🇺3.32.2%
Indonesia 🇮🇩3.32.2%
South Korea 🇰🇷3.02.0%
Vietnam 🇻🇳2.11.4%
Germany 🇩🇪1.81.2%

Together, China and India account for 66% of global coal consumption and emit about 35% of the world’s greenhouse gasses (GHG). If you add the United States to the mix, this goes up to 72% of coal consumption and 49% of GHGs.

How Urgent is to Phase Out Coal?

According to the United Nations, emissions from current and planned fossil energy infrastructure are already more than twice the amount that would push the planet over 1.5°C of global heating, a level that scientists say could bring more intense heat, fire, storms, flooding, and drought than the present 1.2°C.

Apart from being the largest source of CO2 emissions, coal combustion is also a major threat to public health because of the fine particulate matter released into the air.

As just one example of this impact, a recent study from Harvard University estimates air pollution from fossil fuel combustion is responsible for 1 in 5 deaths globally.

The Move to Renewables

Coal-powered electricity generation must fall by 13% every year until 2030 to achieve the Paris Agreement’s goals of keeping global heating to only 1.5 degrees.

To reach the mark, countries would need to speed up the shift from their current carbon-intensive pathways to renewable energy sources like wind and solar.

How fast the transition away from coal will be achieved depends on a complicated balance between carbon emissions cuts and maintaining economic growth, the latter of which is still largely dependent on coal power.

Continue Reading

Subscribe

Popular