Business
The 20 Most and Least Profitable Companies, Per Employee
The 20 Most and Least Profitable Companies, Per Employee
The Fortune 500 is an elite club of the biggest American businesses, which combined to generate profits of over $1.2 trillion in 2019.
But how much profit do these companies make on a per employee basis?
This visualization uncovers the answer by comparing the 20 companies with the most and least returns per employee, using calculations from Tipalti (based on the Fortune 500 list).
Top 20: Most Profit per Employee
Diving right in, the companies that make the most money per employee may surprise you.
Housing giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac take two of the top three spots, bringing in $1.9 million and $1.0 million per employee respectively in 2019.
The two U.S. government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) are major players in the secondary mortgage market, buying and repackaging nearly half the mortgages in the country. The duo was allowed to retain their profits as of October 2019, instead of returning them to the U.S. Treasury.
Company | Sector | Profit per Employee | Profits ($M) | Employees |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association) | Financials | $1,888,000 | $14,160 | 7,500 |
KKR | Financials | $1,448,699 | $2,005 | 1,384 |
Freddie Mac (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) | Financials | $1,046,721 | $7,214 | 6,892 |
NRG Energy | Energy | $969,631 | $4,438 | 4,577 |
EOG Resources | Energy | $943,103 | $2,735 | 2,900 |
Biogen | Health Care | $795,811 | $5,889 | 7,400 |
Blackstone Group | Financials | $705,680 | $2,050 | 2,905 |
ConocoPhillips | Energy | $691,250 | $7,189 | 10,400 |
Enterprise Products Partners | Energy | $628,904 | $4,591 | 7,300 |
Visa | Business Services | $619,487 | $12,080 | 19,500 |
Simon Property Group | Financials | $560,533 | $2,102 | 3,750 |
Gilead Sciences | Health Care | $456,441 | $5,386 | 11,800 |
Oneok | Energy | $443,789 | $1,279 | 2,882 |
FM Global | Financials | $443,391 | $2,479 | 5,591 |
Mastercard | Business Services | $436,452 | $8,118 | 18,600 |
Cheniere Energy | Energy | $423,529 | $648 | 1,530 |
Technology | $411,308 | $18,485 | 44,942 | |
Apple | Technology | $403,328 | $55,256 | 137,000 |
Cincinnati Financial | Financials | $384,038 | $1,997 | 5,200 |
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance | Financials | $373,989 | $3,701 | 9,896 |
Apple employs 137,000 people—the largest workforce by far among the 40 companies profiled—but still makes $403,328 per employee. Facebook is the only other tech giant to bring in more money per employee at $411,308.
Bottom 20: Least Profit per Employee
On the other end of the spectrum, Uber is one of the most well-known companies currently bleeding profits, losing $316K per employee. In fact, the ride-hailing service lost approximately $1.8 billion in the second quarter of 2020 alone.
Company | Sector | Profit per Employee | Profits ($M) | Employees |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apache | Energy | -$1,123,301 | -$3,553 | 3,163 |
EnLink Midstream | Energy | -$825,830 | -$1,119 | 1,355 |
Brighthouse Financial | Financials | -$556,391 | -$740 | 1,330 |
PG&E | Energy | -$332,870 | -$7,656 | 23,000 |
Frontier Communications | Telecommunications | -$322,706 | -$5,911 | 18,317 |
Uber Technologies | Technology | -$316,208 | -$8,506 | 26,900 |
Hess | Energy | -$229,859 | -$408 | 1,775 |
Coty | Household Products | -$199,158 | -$3,784 | 19,000 |
Devon Energy | Energy | -$197,222 | -$355 | 1,800 |
Altria Group | Food, Beverages & Tobacco | -$177,123 | -$1,293 | 7,300 |
National Oilwell Varco | Energy | -$175,927 | -$6,095 | 34,645 |
Equitable Holdings | Financials | -$171,584 | -$1,733 | 10,100 |
Chesapeake Energy | Energy | -$133,913 | -$308 | 2,300 |
CenturyLink | Telecommunications | -$123,976 | -$5,269 | 42,500 |
Mosaic | Chemicals | -$84,683 | -$1,067 | 12,600 |
Alcoa | Materials | -$81,522 | -$1,125 | 13,800 |
Targa Resources | Energy | -$77,985 | -$209 | 2,680 |
Voya Financial | Financials | -$58,500 | -$351 | 6,000 |
Wayfair | Retailing | -$57,992 | -$985 | 16,985 |
Occidental Petroleum | Energy | -$46,319 | -$667 | 14,400 |
COVID-19 has also had an intense effect on some of the companies at the bottom end of the profit per employee spectrum. Chesapeake Energy and Frontier Communications are just two examples that have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in recent months—they each lost $134K and $322K per employee in 2019 respectively.
I’m pretty confident we will see more bankruptcies than in any business person’s lifetime.
—James Hammond, CEO of BankruptcyData
Profit per Employee by Sector
When all the companies in the Fortune 500 are taken into account, sector-specific numbers reveal interesting trends.
Financials bring in the most profit per employee at $116K, while Food and Drug Stores see 17 times less profit at $6.7K per employee. In fact, eight out of the top 20 most profitable companies are found in the financial sector.
Sector | Profits per Employee | Profits ($M) | Employees |
---|---|---|---|
Financials | $116,228 | $378,445 | 3,256,067 |
Technology | $87,532 | $252,836 | 2,888,490 |
Energy | $85,547 | $75,410 | 881,505 |
Media | $57,947 | $21,634 | 373,333 |
Health Care | $54,679 | $145,166 | 2,654,872 |
Telecommunications | $50,636 | $38,251 | 755,417 |
F&B incl. Tobacco | $41,946 | $42,924 | 1,023,317 |
Business Services | $39,354 | $36,835 | 936,000 |
Chemicals | $27,977 | $11,328 | 404,888 |
Apparel | $26,154 | $7,776 | 297,300 |
Industrials | $25,827 | $27,006 | 1,045,675 |
Aerospace & Defence | $24,793 | $23,903 | 964,100 |
Household Products | $24,504 | $10,415 | 425,038 |
Transportation | $21,762 | $32,454 | 1,491,358 |
Engineering & Construction | $19,648 | $6,773 | 344,716 |
Materials | $13,408 | $6,024 | 449,252 |
Retailing | $10,373 | $67,318 | 6,489,923 |
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | $9,653 | $16,880 | 1,748,714 |
Wholesalers | $9,025 | $5,842 | 647,312 |
Motor Vehicles & Parts | $8,113 | $7,108 | 876,123 |
Food & Drug Stores | $6,746 | $8,355 | 1,238,645 |
Interestingly, as a whole, the energy sector comes in third place in terms of profit per employee at $86K—that said, nine out of the bottom 20 least profitable companies are also found in this highly volatile industry.
Though the vast majority of businesses impacted by COVID-19 have been small to mid-sized companies, the above calculations also show that Fortune 500 companies are not safe, either.
Real Estate
Modular Housing vs. Traditional Housing: How Do They Compare?
Modular housing can be completed 40% faster and costs 10-25% less than traditional construction methods. Is the future of housing modular?


Modular Housing vs. Traditional Housing: How Do They Compare?
The U.S. needs new houses. Lots of them.
With housing prices nearing six times annual incomes, increasing supply is a must if there is any hope of bringing down house prices, and modular housing could be the solution.
This visualization is the third and final piece of the Reimagining Home Series from our sponsor Boxabl, where we compare the benefits of modular housing against traditional construction methods. Let’s start with the basics.
What Is Modular Housing?
Modular homes are built offsite, in standardized sections, usually in a factory setting. They are then transported to the building site and assembled on a waiting foundation. Once complete, modular homes look just like any other house.
Modular housing is not the same as manufactured homes, which are also sometimes called mobile homes. Like modular housing, manufactured homes are built offsite in a factory, but the key difference is that they can be moved after being assembled. Modular homes aren’t meant to be moved again after final assembly.
6 Ways Modular Homes Differ to Traditional Homes
The following benefits are based on information from the Modular Home Building Association, as well as a paper given at the 2020 Creative Construction e-Conference by members of the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington.
1. Speed of Construction
Because of the piecemeal nature of modular construction, many building activities can be done simultaneously, greatly reducing the overall time of completion. At the same time, because construction happens indoors, weather delays aren’t an issue. Overall, a modular housing project can be completed in 40% less time than using traditional building construction methods.
2. Cost Effectiveness
Standardization of design, less transportation of materials onsite, and the reduced impact of weather are some of the reasons that modular housing can be much cheaper than traditional building methods. According to the authors of the paper, there was a 10-25% decrease in construction costs for modular housing, again, compared to traditional methods.
3. Customizable
A common misconception is that modular housing isn’t customizable. While many manufacturers will often begin with a starter floor plan, they may also offer various customization options throughout the home.
4. Safety Record
Construction is a dangerous way to make a living. In 2021, construction and extraction workers held the number two spot for fatal occupational injuries in the U.S., with 951 work fatalities.
When you drill down into that number, construction tradespeople are in the majority, by far, with 726 that year alone.Description | Fatalities |
---|---|
Transportation and material moving occupations | 1,523 |
Construction and extraction occupations | 951 |
Installation, maintenance, and repair occupations | 475 |
Building and grounds cleaning and maintenance occupations | 356 |
Management occupations | 323 |
Protective service occupations | 302 |
Production occupations | 242 |
Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations | 218 |
Sales and related occupations | 200 |
Food preparation and serving related occupations | 101 |
Office and administrative support occupations | 91 |
Unknown occupation | 71 |
Personal care and service occupations | 64 |
Healthcare practitioners and technical occupations | 57 |
Arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media occupations | 45 |
Community and social services occupations | 40 |
Healthcare support occupations | 32 |
Architecture and engineering occupations | 29 |
Business and financial operations occupations | 27 |
Educational instruction and library occupations | 16 |
Legal occupations | 11 |
Life, physical, and social science occupations | 10 |
Computer and mathematical occupations | 6 |
Military occupations | 0 |
Total | 5,190 |
Because modular construction happens in a controlled, factory environment, the number of accidents decreases by 80% compared to traditional building methods.
5. Environmental Impact
Anyone who has walked past a residential build site can testify to the amount of waste produced during construction. Modular construction is more efficient and therefore produces less waste. And because onsite construction is limited to assembly, there is less dust and noise. Carbon emissions are also 38% lower.
6. Built to Last
Modular housing is as good, if not better constructed, than many traditionally-built houses. The factory environment allows for superior quality control, and homes built this way use 15-20% more wood per square foot, which makes them stronger. Moreover, in a study commissioned by the Federal Emergency Management Agency after 1992’s Hurricane Andrew found that modular housing “performed much better than conventional residential framing.”
A Market On The Rise
Not only is modular housing cheaper and greener than traditional construction methods, it is also a market on the rise.
According to a recent report, the global modular construction market is expected to reach $54 billion by 2027, with a CAGR of 2.9% between 2021 to 2027.
Thinking Outside of the Box on Housing
Modular housing could be a solution to the housing affordability crisis not only in the U.S., but around the world. And with the global city population expected to hit 68% by 2050, it’s time to think outside the box on housing.
Boxabl uses advanced, mass production techniques to build and ship homes that significantly lower the cost of home ownership for everyone.
This is the final piece in the Reimagining Home Series from our sponsor, Boxabl. Be sure to read parts one and two on urbanization and affordable housing.

Learn more about how Boxabl is helping tackle the housing affordability crisis.

-
Money3 months ago
Visualized: The Most (and Least) Expensive Cities to Live In
From New York to Damascus, this infographic uses EIU cost of living data to rank the world’s most and least expensive cities to live in
-
Markets7 months ago
These Global Cities Show the Highest Real Estate Bubble Risk
A global look at which cities have the most overheated real estate markets. Toronto shows the highest bubble risk in 2022.
-
Personal Finance10 months ago
Mapped: The Salary You Need to Buy a Home in 50 U.S. Cities
Is owning a home still realistic? This map lays out the salary you’d need to buy a home in 50 different U.S. metro areas.
-
Real Estate1 year ago
The World’s Largest Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
Real estate investment trusts (REITS) are a simple alternative for investors looking to gain exposure to real estate.
-
Real Estate2 years ago
Pandemic Recovery: Have North American Downtowns Bounced Back?
All North American downtowns are facing a sluggish recovery, but some are still seeing more than 80% less foot traffic than pre-pandemic times
-
Real Estate2 years ago
The World’s Biggest Real Estate Bubbles in 2021
According to UBS, there are nine real estate markets that are in bubble territory with prices rising to unsustainable levels.
-
Central Banks5 days ago
Charted: Public Trust in the Federal Reserve
-
Visual Capitalist3 weeks ago
Calling All Data Storytellers to Enter our Creator Program Challenge
-
Technology4 days ago
Ranked: The World’s Top 25 Websites in 2023
-
Cities2 weeks ago
Ranked: Top 10 Cities Where International Travelers Spend the Most
-
AI3 days ago
Visualizing the Top U.S. States for AI Jobs
-
VC+2 weeks ago
Coming Soon: Here’s What’s Coming to VC+ Next
-
Personal Finance4 weeks ago
Ranked: The Best U.S. States for Retirement
-
Economy2 weeks ago
Visualizing the American Workforce as 100 People