Maps
Ranked: The Best and Worst State Economies
View a high resolution version of this graphic
Ranked: The Best and Worst State Economies
View the high resolution version of today’s graphic by clicking here.
On a global scale, the U.S. economy is massive at close to $19 trillion in size.
However, the United States is also the sum of its parts. America represents the union of 50 states and other jurisdictions such as D.C., and all of these state-level economies have their own unique problems to overcome, drivers of growth, and local resources that factor into their prosperity.
How can we compare these state economies on an even playing field?
Ranked: State Economies
Using absolute numbers, it’s hard to directly compare California ($2.75 trillion GDP, 39.5 million people) to a state like Vermont ($33 billion, 0.6 million people). By leveling the playing field, we can get an idea of how states contrast in terms of relative economic strength that companies and workers would better recognize.
Today’s infographic uses 27 metrics from WalletHub to rank state economies. These metrics are grouped into three major categories, which are evenly weighted:
1. Economic Activity: GDP growth, startup activity, exports per capita, and three other metrics
2. Economic Health: Labor force changes, median household income, unemployment, and 13 other metrics
3. Innovation Potential: Entrepreneurial activity, R&D investment, patents per capita, and three other metrics
Note: the full methodology with all 27 factors can be found here.
Here’s how the rankings shake down, for all 50 state economies and D.C.:
Overall | State | Total Score | Economic Activity | Economic Health | Innovation Potential |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Washington | 76.5 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
2 | California | 73.8 | 2 | 26 | 2 |
3 | Utah | 73.8 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
4 | Massachusetts | 73.3 | 4 | 29 | 1 |
5 | District of Columbia | 67.1 | 3 | 6 | 13 |
6 | Colorado | 66.4 | 15 | 3 | 5 |
7 | Oregon | 65.7 | 6 | 9 | 10 |
8 | New Hampshire | 62.5 | 17 | 10 | 7 |
9 | Maryland | 61.0 | 18 | 28 | 6 |
10 | Delaware | 59.8 | 10 | 20 | 15 |
11 | Idaho | 58.2 | 21 | 2 | 19 |
12 | Michigan | 57.9 | 23 | 33 | 8 |
13 | Virginia | 57.5 | 9 | 18 | 23 |
14 | Arizona | 57.4 | 16 | 24 | 14 |
15 | North Carolina | 57.3 | 24 | 11 | 12 |
16 | Connecticut | 57.3 | 12 | 45 | 9 |
17 | Minnesota | 56.6 | 20 | 16 | 17 |
18 | Georgia | 56.0 | 8 | 21 | 29 |
19 | New York | 55.7 | 7 | 44 | 18 |
20 | Texas | 55.4 | 19 | 15 | 21 |
21 | New Jersey | 55.1 | 11 | 47 | 11 |
22 | Florida | 54.5 | 13 | 12 | 30 |
23 | Missouri | 50.2 | 34 | 19 | 24 |
24 | South Carolina | 49.8 | 14 | 23 | 41 |
25 | Wisconsin | 49.2 | 33 | 14 | 31 |
26 | Vermont | 49.1 | 35 | 31 | 22 |
27 | Nebraska | 49.0 | 36 | 7 | 34 |
28 | Indiana | 48.9 | 26 | 25 | 35 |
29 | Nevada | 48.1 | 22 | 27 | 40 |
30 | Pennsylvania | 47.7 | 25 | 41 | 27 |
31 | Montana | 47.7 | 46 | 13 | 25 |
32 | South Dakota | 47.1 | 39 | 5 | 39 |
33 | Iowa | 47.0 | 31 | 22 | 37 |
34 | Illinois | 46.9 | 27 | 43 | 26 |
35 | Tennessee | 46.4 | 29 | 17 | 44 |
36 | Rhode Island | 46.0 | 40 | 40 | 20 |
37 | Ohio | 45.7 | 30 | 42 | 28 |
38 | Kansas | 44.3 | 43 | 34 | 32 |
39 | Hawaii | 43.7 | 38 | 30 | 38 |
40 | New Mexico | 42.1 | 44 | 51 | 16 |
41 | Alabama | 41.6 | 32 | 38 | 43 |
42 | North Dakota | 41.1 | 51 | 8 | 36 |
43 | Wyoming | 39.4 | 47 | 32 | 45 |
44 | Kentucky | 38.9 | 28 | 46 | 48 |
45 | Maine | 38.9 | 37 | 36 | 47 |
46 | Alaska | 37.7 | 50 | 39 | 33 |
47 | Oklahoma | 37.1 | 49 | 37 | 42 |
48 | Arkansas | 35.9 | 45 | 35 | 50 |
49 | Mississippi | 35.0 | 41 | 48 | 46 |
50 | Louisiana | 33.2 | 42 | 50 | 49 |
51 | West Virginia | 28.1 | 48 | 49 | 51 |
Topping the list for overall score were the states of Washington, California, and Utah, and the first place state in each major category includes Washington (Economic Activity), Utah (Economic Health), and Massachusetts (Innovation Potential).
Case in Point
Looking at statistics and scoring methodologies alone can be a bit esoteric, so let’s look at some individual cases to see some contrast.
Utah (Rank: #3)
Utah consistently ranks as one of the top states for business, in the country, as well as a top state for job growth and employment. It’s also pretty unique in that it has a fairly diversified economy, with major sectors in the tourism, agriculture, tech, manufacturing, finance, energy, and mining industries.
Utah has a higher median household income ($65,977), and a blistering 3.4% employment growth rate.
Florida (Rank: #22)
Using this methodology, Florida falls somewhere in the middle of the rankings. The good news is the state has good employment growth (2.9%) and a myriad of thriving industries like aerospace. The bad news? Florida has the second-highest level of poverty in the union at 19%, and it also has a lower median household income ($50,860) than the national average.
Maine (Rank: #45)
Economic activity is sluggish in the country’s most northeastern state. With an aging population, slow employment growth (0.8%), and a number of lost manufacturing jobs over the last 15 years, the state is trying to rebound. Maine isn’t helped by having one of the highest tax burdens for its citizens and businesses in the country, either.
Real Estate
Mapped: The Growth in House Prices by Country
Global house prices were resilient in 2022, rising 6%. We compare nominal and real price growth by country as interest rates surged.

Mapped: The Growth in House Prices by Country
This was originally posted on Advisor Channel. Sign up to the free mailing list to get beautiful visualizations on financial markets that help advisors and their clients.
Global housing prices rose an average of 6% annually, between Q4 2021 and Q4 2022.
In real terms that take inflation into account, prices actually fell 2% for the first decline in 12 years. Despite a surge in interest rates and mortgage costs, housing markets were noticeably stable. Real prices remain 7% above pre-pandemic levels.
In this graphic, we show the change in residential property prices with data from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
The Growth in House Prices, Ranked
The following dataset from the BIS covers nominal and real house price growth across 58 countries and regions as of the fourth quarter of 2022:
Price Growth Rank | Country / Region | Nominal Year-over-Year Change (%) | Real Year-over-Year Change (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ๐น๐ท Tรผrkiye | 167.9 | 51.0 |
2 | ๐ท๐ธ Serbia | 23.1 | 7.0 |
3 | ๐ท๐บ Russia | 23.1 | 9.7 |
4 | ๐ฒ๐ฐ North Macedonia | 20.6 | 1.0 |
5 | ๐ฎ๐ธ Iceland | 20.3 | 9.9 |
6 | ๐ญ๐ท Croatia | 17.3 | 3.6 |
7 | ๐ช๐ช Estonia | 16.9 | -3.0 |
8 | ๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel | 16.8 | 11.0 |
9 | ๐ญ๐บ Hungary | 16.5 | -5.1 |
10 | ๐ฑ๐น Lithuania | 16.0 | -5.5 |
11 | ๐ธ๐ฎ Slovenia | 15.4 | 4.2 |
12 | ๐ง๐ฌ Bulgaria | 13.4 | -3.2 |
13 | ๐ฌ๐ท Greece | 12.2 | 3.7 |
14 | ๐ต๐น Portugal | 11.3 | 1.3 |
15 | ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom | 10.0 | -0.7 |
16 | ๐ธ๐ฐ Slovak Republic | 9.7 | -4.8 |
17 | ๐ฆ๐ช United Arab Emirates | 9.6 | 2.9 |
18 | ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | 9.3 | -6.9 |
19 | ๐ฑ๐ป Latvia | 9.1 | -10.2 |
20 | ๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 8.6 | 1.9 |
21 | ๐ฎ๐ช Ireland | 8.6 | -0.2 |
22 | ๐จ๐ฑ Chile | 8.2 | -3.0 |
23 | ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 7.9 | 3.9 |
24 | ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | 7.9 | -0.1 |
25 | ๐ต๐ญ Philippines | 7.7 | -0.2 |
26 | ๐บ๐ธ United States | 7.1 | 0.0 |
27 | ๐จ๐ฟ Czechia | 6.9 | -7.6 |
28 | ๐ท๐ด Romania | 6.7 | -7.5 |
29 | ๐ฒ๐น Malta | 6.3 | -0.7 |
30 | ๐จ๐พ Cyprus | 6.3 | -2.9 |
31 | ๐จ๐ด Colombia | 6.3 | -5.6 |
32 | ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | 5.6 | -0.5 |
33 | ๐ช๐ธ Spain | 5.5 | -1.1 |
34 | ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 5.4 | 2.4 |
35 | ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 5.4 | -5.3 |
36 | ๐ฆ๐น Austria | 5.2 | -4.8 |
37 | ๐ซ๐ท France | 4.8 | -1.2 |
38 | ๐ง๐ช Belgium | 4.7 | -5.7 |
39 | ๐น๐ญ Thailand | 4.7 | -1.1 |
40 | ๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa | 3.1 | -4.0 |
41 | ๐ฎ๐ณ India | 2.8 | -3.1 |
42 | ๐ฎ๐น Italy | 2.8 | -8.0 |
43 | ๐ณ๐ด Norway | 2.6 | -3.8 |
44 | ๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia | 2.0 | -3.4 |
45 | ๐ต๐ช Peru | 1.5 | -6.3 |
46 | ๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia | 1.2 | -2.6 |
47 | ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea | -0.1 | -5.0 |
48 | ๐ฒ๐ฆ Morocco | -0.1 | -7.7 |
49 | ๐ง๐ท Brazil | -0.1 | -5.8 |
50 | ๐ซ๐ฎ Finland | -2.3 | -10.2 |
51 | ๐ฉ๐ฐ Denmark | -2.4 | -10.6 |
52 | ๐ฆ๐บ Australia | -3.2 | -10.2 |
53 | ๐ฉ๐ช Germany | -3.6 | -12.1 |
54 | ๐ธ๐ช Sweden | -3.7 | -13.7 |
55 | ๐จ๐ณ China | -3.7 | -5.4 |
56 | ๐จ๐ฆ Canada | -3.8 | -9.8 |
57 | ๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand | -10.4 | -16.5 |
58 | ๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong SAR | -13.5 | -15.1 |
Tรผrkiyeโs property prices jumped the highest globally, at nearly 168% amid soaring inflation.
Real estate demand has increased alongside declining interest rates. The government drastically cut interest rates from 19% in late 2021 to 8.5% to support a weakening economy.
Many European countries saw some of the highest price growth in nominal terms. A strong labor market and low interest rates pushed up prices, even as mortgage rates broadly doubled across the continent. For real price growth, most countries were in negative territoryโnotably Sweden, Germany, and Denmark.
Nominal U.S. housing prices grew just over 7%, while real price growth halted to 0%. Prices have remained elevated given the stubbornly low supply of inventory. In fact, residential prices remain 45% above pre-pandemic levels.
How Do Interest Rates Impact Property Markets?
Global house prices boomed during the pandemic as central banks cut interest rates to prop up economies.
Now, rates have returned to levels last seen before the Global Financial Crisis. On average, rates have increased four percentage points in many major economies. Roughly three-quarters of the countries in the BIS dataset witnessed negative year-over-year real house price growth as of the fourth quarter of 2022.
Interest rates have a large impact on property prices. Cross-country evidence shows that for every one percentage point increase in real interest rates, the growth rate of housing prices tends to fall by about two percentage points.
When Will Housing Prices Fall?
The rise in U.S. interest rates has been counteracted by homeowners being reluctant to sell so they can keep their low mortgage rates. As a result, it is keeping inventory low and prices high. Homeowners canโt sell and keep their low mortgage rates unless they meet strict conditions on a new property.
Additionally, several other factors impact price dynamics. Construction costs, income growth, labor shortages, and population growth all play a role.
With a strong labor market continuing through 2023, stable incomes may help stave off prices from falling. On the other hand, buyers with floating-rate mortgages face steeper costs and may be unable to afford new rates. This could increase housing supply in the market, potentially leading to lower prices.
-
Real Estate7 hours ago
Mapped: The Growth in House Prices by Country
-
AI2 weeks ago
Ranked: The World’s Top 25 Websites in 2023
-
Misc5 hours ago
Visualized: The 4 Billion Year Path of Human Evolution
-
Misc4 weeks ago
Ranked: Top 10 Cities Where International Travelers Spend the Most
-
Technology2 weeks ago
Visualizing the Top U.S. States for AI Jobs
-
VC+4 weeks ago
Coming Soon: Here’s What’s Coming to VC+ Next
-
Energy1 week ago
Mapped: Renewable Energy and Battery Installations in the U.S. in 2023
-
Demographics4 weeks ago
Visualizing the American Workforce as 100 People