population
Mapped: Which States Californians Moved To (2020-2021)
!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r=0;r<e.length;r++)if(e[r].contentWindow===a.source){var i=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";e[r].style.height=i}}}))}();
Mapped: Where Californians Moved Between 2020–2021
Californians have had a hard time with it in recent years. Because of the state’s ballooning cost of living, many residents—particularly from middle and low income families—have departed for more affordable states.
But where did they go?
USAFacts tracked data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s population estimates, and visualized the states with the highest number of Californian transplants between 2020–21. The interactive heat map colors states by popularity—the darker the shade, the more Californians moved there.
Ranked: States with Highest Californian Transplants
More than 100,000 Californians moved to Texas between 2020–21, well ahead of second place Arizona (63,000 Californians) and third ranked Nevada (55,000).
Texas has recently emerged as a popular destination, not just for Californians, but Americans from all regions. No state income tax and lower cost of living, along with a growing tech hub is pulling in Americans from all income brackets. Meanwhile, Arizona and Nevada offer similar tax and affordability benefits as well.
Here’s the full ranking of which state Californians moved to in the first full year of the pandemic.
Rank | State | Californian Transplants (2020–21) |
---|---|---|
1 | Texas | 105,434 |
2 | Arizona | 63,097 |
3 | Nevada | 54,740 |
4 | Washington | 46,677 |
5 | Florida | 40,730 |
6 | Oregon | 32,906 |
7 | Colorado | 26,911 |
8 | New York | 21,700 |
9 | Idaho | 26,233 |
10 | Tennessee | 23,403 |
11 | North Carolina | 21,961 |
12 | Utah | 19,930 |
13 | Georgia | 18,713 |
14 | Virginia | 18,441 |
15 | Illinois | 13,919 |
16 | Massachusetts | 9,568 |
17 | Pennsylvania | 10,072 |
18 | Hawaii | 10,743 |
19 | Ohio | 9,596 |
20 | Michigan | 9,190 |
21 | Missouri | 9,928 |
22 | New Jersey | 8,091 |
23 | Oklahoma | 9,815 |
24 | Maryland | 7,988 |
25 | South Carolina | 8,838 |
26 | New Mexico | 6,427 |
27 | Indiana | 7,046 |
28 | Minnesota | 6,239 |
29 | Montana | 6,563 |
30 | Wisconsin | 5,417 |
31 | Arkansas | 6,554 |
32 | Alabama | 4,876 |
33 | Kansas | 4,588 |
34 | Kentucky | 4,585 |
35 | Connecticut | 3,932 |
36 | Louisiana | 3,810 |
37 | Iowa | 3,598 |
38 | Washington, DC | 2,381 |
39 | Nebraska | 3,032 |
40 | Wyoming | 2,607 |
41 | Alaska | 2,273 |
42 | South Dakota | 2,484 |
43 | Mississippi | 2,423 |
44 | Maine | 1,965 |
45 | New Hampshire | 1,877 |
46 | Rhode Island | 1,343 |
47 | North Dakota | 1,367 |
48 | Vermont | 1,092 |
49 | Delaware | 961 |
50 | West Virginia | 884 |
On opposite corners of the country Washington (47,000) and Florida (41,000) round out the top five destinations for Californian expats.
On the other hand West Virginia and Delaware were the least popular spots for Californians to move to, with both attracting fewer than 1,000 people.
Ranked: Californian Net Migration
As startling as these numbers seem, it’s also useful to remember that many people also move to California, which is the biggest economic hub in the U.S.
Below we have California’s net migration numbers, accounting for those moving to the state, where a negative number implies that California lost more residents than it gained from a particular state.
State | Californian Net Migration 2020–21 |
---|---|
Texas | -69,342 |
Arizona | -37,825 |
Nevada | -30,386 |
Idaho | -21,558 |
Florida | -20,867 |
Washington | -18,762 |
Tennessee | -18,201 |
Oregon | -17,109 |
Colorado | -12,618 |
Utah | -11,964 |
North Carolina | -11,681 |
Georgia | -8,872 |
Oklahoma | -6,137 |
South Carolina | -5,034 |
Missouri | -4,920 |
Montana | -4,813 |
Virginia | -4,524 |
Arkansas | -4,428 |
New Mexico | -2,505 |
Alabama | -2,502 |
Indiana | -2,444 |
Kentucky | -2,362 |
Ohio | -2,217 |
Hawaii | -2,201 |
Kansas | -1,712 |
Wyoming | -1,669 |
South Dakota | -1,669 |
Pennsylvania | -1,607 |
Michigan | -1,344 |
Iowa | -1,255 |
Wisconsin | -1,189 |
Maine | -1,122 |
Nebraska | -1,033 |
Minnesota | -984 |
Maryland | -910 |
New Hampshire | -865 |
Mississippi | -584 |
Vermont | -539 |
Connecticut | -442 |
West Virginia | -365 |
Delaware | -310 |
Alaska | -277 |
Louisiana | -229 |
North Dakota | -210 |
Rhode Island | -191 |
Washington, DC | +161 |
Massachusetts | +537 |
New Jersey | +1,311 |
Illinois | +1,978 |
New York | +6,031 |
Unsurprisingly, California lost the most net residents to Texas, Arizona, and Nevada. However Idaho jumps past Florida and Washington, with California losing 21,000 more residents than gained from the Gem State.
In fact, both Idaho and Nevada had the highest proportion of incoming Californians to their 2021 populations, at more than 1.38%.
On the other hand, California gained more residents than it lost from four states (New York, Illinois, New Jersey, Massachusetts) and Washington D.C.
Why Are Californians Leaving?
A key driver of migration is the state’s continuing affordability challenges where housing costs have pushed home ownership out of many Californians’ reach. It is also one of the most difficult states to retire in, where $1 million can last as little as eight years.
Separately, the rise of remote work in 2020 allowed many Californians to move out of their more expensive state to cross into regions with a lower cost of living while maintaining their economic opportunities.
Within the state itself, the more rural, less populous parts have seen, proportionally, the most outward bound migration—a phenomenon occurring across America.
These sustained levels of outward migration, combined with slower population growth, has consequences. California already lost a seat in the House of Representatives after the 2020 Census (Texas gained two and Florida gained one) which results in one fewer vote in the Electoral College and proportionally lower census-guided federal spending.
At the same time however, while domestic outward migration continues, the Golden State is still successfully attracting international immigrants who are more than filling up the gaps.
Where Does This Data Come From?
Source: USAFacts.
Note: USAFacts sources their data from IRS tax returns which has information on tax filers who moved at county, state, and international levels. However, it misses low-income residents who choose not to file taxes. Please view their website for more details.
This article was published as a part of Visual Capitalist's Creator Program, which features data-driven visuals from some of our favorite Creators around the world.
Economy
Mapped: How Populations Have Changed in the Americas (1990-2023)
Nearly every country in the Americas has seen a population boom in the last three decades. Some have doubled in size.
How Populations Have Changed in the Americas Since 1990
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Currently more than one billion people live in the Americas, an area with 35 countries and many overseas territories and dependencies.
This color-coded map shows population changes by country in the Americas from 1990 to 2023. Data was sourced from the 2024 World Population Prospects from the UN.
Importantly the graphic only includes sovereign states. Furthermore, some country labels have been skipped for legibility. The full data, including full population figures, can be found in the next section’s table.
Three Decades of Population Boom
The top 14 largest countries in the Americas by population size have all seen nearly 40% population growth between 1990–2023.
Country | 1990 | 2023 | Change |
---|---|---|---|
🇺🇸 U.S. | 253,373,000 | 343,477,000 | 36% |
🇧🇷 Brazil | 149,143,000 | 211,141,000 | 42% |
🇲🇽 Mexico | 82,820,000 | 129,740,000 | 57% |
🇨🇴 Colombia | 32,440,000 | 52,321,000 | 61% |
🇦🇷 Argentina | 32,756,000 | 45,538,000 | 39% |
🇨🇦 Canada | 27,789,000 | 39,299,000 | 41% |
🇵🇪 Peru | 22,015,000 | 33,846,000 | 54% |
🇻🇪 Venezuela | 19,827,000 | 28,301,000 | 43% |
🇨🇱 Chile | 13,437,000 | 19,659,000 | 46% |
🇬🇹 Guatemala | 9,025,000 | 18,125,000 | 101% |
🇪🇨 Ecuador | 10,474,000 | 17,980,000 | 72% |
🇧🇴 Bolivia | 7,130,000 | 12,244,000 | 72% |
🇭🇹 Haiti | 6,854,000 | 11,637,000 | 70% |
🇩🇴 Dominican Republic | 7,151,000 | 11,331,000 | 58% |
🇨🇺 Cuba | 10,632,000 | 11,020,000 | 4% |
🇭🇳 Honduras | 4,980,000 | 10,645,000 | 114% |
🇵🇾 Paraguay | 4,036,000 | 6,844,000 | 70% |
🇳🇮 Nicaragua | 4,163,000 | 6,824,000 | 64% |
🇸🇻 El Salvador | 5,400,000 | 6,310,000 | 17% |
🇨🇷 Costa Rica | 3,122,000 | 5,106,000 | 64% |
🇵🇦 Panama | 2,456,000 | 4,459,000 | 82% |
🇺🇾 Uruguay | 3,104,000 | 3,388,000 | 9% |
🇯🇲 Jamaica | 2,380,000 | 2,840,000 | 19% |
🇹🇹 Trinidad & Tobago | 1,252,000 | 1,503,000 | 20% |
🇬🇾 Guyana | 750,000 | 826,000 | 10% |
🇸🇷 Suriname | 412,000 | 629,000 | 53% |
🇧🇿 Belize | 183,000 | 411,000 | 125% |
🇧🇸 Bahamas | 276,000 | 399,000 | 45% |
🇧🇧 Barbados | 259,000 | 282,000 | 9% |
🇱🇨 St Lucia | 138,000 | 179,000 | 30% |
🇬🇩 Grenada | 100,000 | 117,000 | 17% |
🇻🇨 St Vincent & the Grenadines | 112,000 | 101,000 | -10% |
🇦🇬 Antigua & Barbuda | 63,000 | 93,000 | 48% |
🇩🇲 Dominica | 70,000 | 67,000 | -4% |
🇰🇳 St. Kitts & Nevis | 40,000 | 47,000 | 18% |
Only sovereign states included. Population changes measured between July 1st 1990–2023. Figures rounded.
What does this mean in actual people? For the top three by size: the U.S. gained 90 million residents, while Brazil and Mexico added 62 million and 42 million, respectively.
Ranked 10th by population, Guatemala more than doubled its residents from 9 million to 18 million in 2023. However it still doesn’t take the crown for largest percentage growth, which belongs to Belize (+125%).
In fact, only three countries in the Americas registered single-digit percentage gains: Cuba, Uruguay, and Barbados.
Has the Americas’ Population Fallen Anywhere Since 1990?
Of the list with only sovereign states, only Dominica (-4%) and St. Vincent and the Grenadines (-10%) saw their number of residents fall.
However, some overseas territories and dependencies not pictured in this map also saw declines.
In fact, every U.S. territory—including Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam—has been losing people since 2010, a swift departure from the 20th century when populations were expanding. A Washington Post analysis found that many of the same troubles ailing rural America (manufacturing decline, falling birth rates, and brain drain) are besetting U.S. territories as well.
Learn More on the Voronoi App
How have countries from other regions done in the same time period? Check out Thirty Years of Population Change in Europe (1990–2023).
-
Money2 weeks ago
Ranked: The Countries With the Highest Wealth per Person
-
United States3 weeks ago
Mapped: U.S. Obesity Rates, by State
-
Inequality4 weeks ago
Mapped: Poverty Rates by U.S State
-
Technology4 weeks ago
Ranked: Countries That Use ChatGPT the Most
-
Money6 days ago
Mapped: The Purchasing Power of $100 in Each U.S. State
-
Crime4 weeks ago
Mapped: Violent Crime Rates by U.S. State
-
Education1 week ago
Mapped: America’s Best Universities, by Region
-
Culture2 weeks ago
Ranked: Which Countries Drink the Most Beer?