Markets
The Top 100 Companies of the World: The U.S. vs Everyone Else
The Top 100 Companies of the World: U.S. vs Everyone
When it comes to breaking down the top 100 companies of the world, the United States still commands the largest slice of the pie.
Throughout the 20th century and before globalization reached its current peaks, American companies made the country an economic powerhouse and the source of a majority of global market value.
But even as countries like China have made headway with multi-billion dollar companies of their own, and the market’s most important sectors have shifted, the U.S. has managed to stay on top.
How do the top 100 companies of the world stack up? This visualization pulls from PwC’s annual ranking of the world’s largest companies, using market capitalization data from May 2021.
Where are the World’s Largest Companies Located?
The world’s top 100 companies account for a massive $31.7 trillion in market cap, but that wealth is not distributed evenly.
Between companies, there’s a wide range of market caps. For example, the difference between the world’s largest company (Apple) and the 100th largest (Anheuser-Busch) is $1.9 trillion.
And between countries, that divide becomes even more stark. Of the 16 countries with companies making the top 100 ranking, the U.S. accounts for 65% of the total market cap value.
Location | # of Companies | Market Capitalization (May 2021) |
---|---|---|
🇺🇸 United States | 59 | $20.55T |
🇨🇳 China | 14 | $4.19T |
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia | 1 | $1.92T |
🇨🇭 Switzerland | 3 | $0.82T |
🇳🇱 Netherlands | 3 | $0.58T |
🇯🇵 Japan | 3 | $0.56T |
🇫🇷 France | 2 | $0.55T |
🇩🇪 Germany | 3 | $0.46T |
🇰🇷 South Korea | 1 | $0.43T |
🇬🇧 United Kingdom | 3 | $0.43T |
🇮🇳 India | 2 | $0.34T |
🇮🇪 Ireland | 2 | $0.34T |
🇦🇺 Australia | 1 | $0.16T |
🇩🇰 Denmark | 1 | $0.16T |
🇨🇦 Canada | 1 | $0.13T |
🇧🇪 Belgium | 1 | $0.13T |
Compared to the U.S., other once-prominent markets like Japan, France, and the UK have seen their share of the world’s top 100 companies falter over the years. In fact, all of Europe accounts for just $3.46 trillion or 11% of the total market cap value of the list.
A major reason for the U.S. dominance in market values is a shift in important industries and contributors. Of the world’s top 100 companies, 52% were based in either technology or consumer discretionary, and the current largest players like Apple, Alphabet, Tesla, and Walmart are all American-based.
The Top 100 Companies of the World: Competition From China
The biggest and most impressive competitor to the U.S. is China.
With 14 companies of its own in the world’s top 100, China accounted for $4.19 trillion or 13% of the top 100’s total market cap value. That includes two of the top 10 firms by market cap, Tencent and Alibaba.
Company | Country | Sector | Market Cap (May 2021) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
#1 | Apple | United States | Technology | $2,051B |
#2 | Saudi Aramco | Saudi Arabia | Energy | $1,920B |
#3 | Microsoft | United States | Technology | $1,778B |
#4 | Amazon | United States | Consumer Discretionary | $1,558B |
#5 | Alphabet | United States | Technology | $1,393B |
#6 | United States | Technology | $839B | |
#7 | Tencent | China | Technology | $753B |
#8 | Tesla | United States | Consumer Discretionary | $641B |
#9 | Alibaba | China | Consumer Discretionary | $615B |
#10 | Berkshire Hathway | United States | Financials | $588B |
#11 | TSMC | China | Technology | $534B |
#12 | Visa | United States | Industrials | $468B |
#13 | JPMorgan Chase | United States | Financials | $465B |
#14 | Johnson & Johnson | United States | Health Care | $433B |
#15 | Samsung Electronics | South Korea | Technology | $431B |
#16 | Kweichow Moutai | China | Consumer Staples | $385B |
#17 | Walmart | United States | Consumer Discretionary | $383B |
#18 | Mastercard | United States | Industrials | $354B |
#19 | UnitedHealth Group | United States | Health Care | $352B |
#20 | LVMH Moët Hennessy | France | Consumer Discretionary | $337B |
#21 | Walt Disney Co | United States | Consumer Discretionary | $335B |
#22 | Bank of America | United States | Financials | $334B |
#23 | Procter & Gamble | United States | Consumer Staples | $333B |
#24 | Nvidia | United States | Technology | $331B |
#25 | Home Depot | United States | Consumer Discretionary | $329B |
#26 | Nestle SA | Switzerland | Consumer Staples | $322B |
#27 | ICBC | China | Financials | $290B |
#28 | Paypal Holdings | United States | Industrials | $284B |
#29 | Roche Holdings | Switzerland | Health Care | $283B |
#30 | Intel | United States | Technology | $261B |
#31 | ASML Holding NV | Netherlands | Technology | $255B |
#32 | Toyota Motor | Japan | Consumer Discretionary | $254B |
#33 | Comcast | United States | Telecommunication | $248B |
#34 | Verizon Communications | United States | Telecommunication | $241B |
#35 | Exxon Mobil | United States | Energy | $236B |
#36 | Netflix | United States | Consumer Discretionary | $231B |
#37 | Adobe | United States | Technology | $228B |
#38 | Coca-Cola Co | United States | Consumer Staples | $227B |
#39 | Meituan | China | Technology | $226B |
#40 | Ping An | China | Financials | $219B |
#41 | Cisco Systems | United States | Telecommunication | $218B |
#42 | AT&T | United States | Financials | $216B |
#43 | L'Oréal | France | Consumer Discretionary | $215B |
#44 | China Construction Bank | China | Financials | $213B |
#45 | Abbott Labs | United States | Health Care | $212B |
#46 | Novartis AG | Switzerland | Health Care | $212B |
#47 | Nike | United States | Consumer Discretionary | $209B |
#48 | Oracle | United States | Technology | $202B |
#49 | Pfizer | United States | Health Care | $202B |
#50 | Chevron | United States | Oil & Gas | $202B |
#51 | China Merchants Bank | China | Financials | $196B |
#52 | PepsiCo | United States | Consumer Staples | $195B |
#53 | Salesforce.com | United States | Technology | $195B |
#54 | Merck & Co | United States | Health Care | $195B |
#55 | AbbVie | United States | Health Care | $191B |
#56 | Broadcom | United States | Technology | $189B |
#57 | Prosus NV | Netherlands | Technology | $181B |
#58 | Reliance Industries | India | Energy | $180B |
#59 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | United States | Health Care | $180B |
#60 | Eli Lilly & Co | United States | Health Care | $179B |
#61 | Agricultural Bank of China | China | Financials | $178B |
#62 | Softbank Group | Japan | Telecommunication | $176B |
#63 | Accenture | Ireland | Industrials | $176B |
#64 | Texas Instruments | United States | Technology | $174B |
#65 | McDonalds | United States | Consumer Discretionary | $167B |
#66 | Volkswagen AG | Germany | Consumer Discretionary | $165B |
#67 | BHP Group | Australia | Basic Materials | $163B |
#68 | Wells Fargo & Co | United States | Financials | $162B |
#69 | Tata Consultancy Services | India | Technology | $161B |
#70 | Danaher | United States | Health Care | $160B |
#71 | Novo Nordisk | Denmark | Health Care | $160B |
#72 | Medtronic | Ireland | Health Care | $159B |
#73 | Wuliangye Yibin | China | Consumer Staples | $159B |
#74 | Costco Wholesale | United States | Consumer Discretionary | $156B |
#75 | T-Mobile US | United States | Telecommunication | $156B |
#76 | Citigroup | United States | Financials | $152B |
#77 | Honeywell | United States | Industrials | $151B |
#78 | Qualcomm | United States | Technology | $151B |
#79 | SAP SE | Germany | Technology | $151B |
#80 | Boeing | United States | Industrials | $149B |
#81 | Royal Dutch Shell | Netherlands | Oil & Gas | $148B |
#82 | NextEra Energy | United States | Utilities | $148B |
#83 | United Parcel Service | United States | Industrials | $148B |
#84 | Union PAC | United States | Industrials | $148B |
#85 | Unilever | United Kingdom | Consumer Staples | $147B |
#86 | AIA | China | Financials | $147B |
#87 | Linde | United Kingdom | Basic Materials | $146B |
#88 | Amgen | United States | Health Care | $144B |
#89 | Bristol Myers Squibb | United States | Health Care | $141B |
#90 | Siemens AG | Germany | Industrials | $140B |
#91 | Bank of China | China | Financials | $139B |
#92 | Philip Morris | United States | Consumer Staples | $138B |
#93 | Lowe's Companies | United States | Consumer Discretionary | $136B |
#94 | Charter Communications | United States | Telecommunication | $135B |
#95 | China Mobile | China | Telecommunication | $134B |
#96 | Sony Group | Japan | Consumer Discretionary | $132B |
#97 | Astrazeneca | United Kingdom | Health Care | $131B |
#98 | Royal Bank of Canada | Canada | Financials | $131B |
#99 | Starbucks | United States | Consumer Discretionary | $129B |
#100 | Anheuser-Busch | Belgium | Consumer Staples | $128B |
Impressively, China’s rise in market value isn’t limited to well-known tech and consumer companies. The country’s second biggest contributing industry to the top 100 firms was finance, once also the most valuable sector in the U.S. (currently 4th behind tech, consumer discretionary, and health care).
Other notable countries on the list include Saudi Arabia and its state-owned oil and gas giant Saudi Aramco, which is the third largest company in the world. Despite only having one company in the top 100, Saudi Arabia had the third-largest share of the top 100’s total market cap value.
As Europe continues to lose ground year-over-year and the rest of Asia struggles to keep up, the top 100 companies might become increasingly concentrated in just the U.S. and China. The question is, will the imbalance of global market value start to even out, or become even bigger?
Markets
Charted: U.S. Consumer Debt Approaches $16 Trillion
Robust growth in mortgages has pushed U.S. consumer debt to nearly $16 trillion. Click to gain further insight into the situation.

Charted: U.S. Consumer Debt Approaches $16 Trillion
According to the Federal Reserve (Fed), U.S. consumer debt is approaching a record-breaking $16 trillion. Critically, the rate of increase in consumer debt for the fourth quarter of 2021 was also the highest seen since 2007.
This graphic provides context into the consumer debt situation using data from the end of 2021.
Housing Vs. Non-Housing Debt
The following table includes the data used in the above graphic. Housing debt covers mortgages, while non-housing debt covers auto loans, student loans, and credit card balances.
Date | Housing Debt (USD trillions) | Non-Housing Debt (USD trillions) | Total Consumer Debt (USD trillions) |
---|---|---|---|
Q1 2003 | 5.18 | 2.05 | 7.23 |
Q2 2003 | 5.34 | 2.04 | 7.38 |
Q3 2003 | 5.45 | 2.10 | 7.55 |
Q4 2003 | 5.96 | 2.10 | 8.06 |
Q1 2004 | 6.17 | 2.13 | 8.30 |
Q2 2004 | 6.34 | 2.12 | 8.46 |
Q3 2004 | 6.64 | 2.20 | 8.84 |
Q4 2004 | 6.83 | 2.22 | 9.05 |
Q1 2005 | 7.01 | 2.19 | 9.20 |
Q2 2005 | 7.23 | 2.26 | 9.49 |
Q3 2005 | 7.45 | 2.35 | 9.80 |
Q4 2005 | 7.67 | 2.34 | 10.01 |
Q1 2006 | 8.02 | 2.36 | 10.38 |
Q2 2006 | 8.35 | 2.40 | 10.75 |
Q3 2006 | 8.65 | 2.46 | 11.11 |
Q4 2006 | 8.83 | 2.48 | 11.31 |
Q1 2007 | 9.03 | 2.46 | 11.49 |
Q2 2007 | 9.33 | 2.53 | 11.86 |
Q3 2007 | 9.56 | 2.58 | 12.14 |
Q4 2007 | 9.75 | 2.63 | 12.38 |
Q1 2008 | 9.89 | 2.65 | 12.54 |
Q2 2008 | 9.95 | 2.65 | 12.60 |
Q3 2008 | 9.98 | 2.69 | 12.67 |
Q4 2008 | 9.97 | 2.71 | 12.68 |
Q1 2009 | 9.85 | 2.68 | 12.53 |
Q2 2009 | 9.77 | 2.63 | 12.40 |
Q3 2009 | 9.65 | 2.62 | 12.27 |
Q4 2009 | 9.55 | 2.62 | 12.17 |
Q1 2010 | 9.53 | 2.58 | 12.11 |
Q2 2010 | 9.38 | 2.55 | 11.93 |
Q3 2010 | 9.28 | 2.56 | 11.84 |
Q4 2010 | 9.12 | 2.59 | 11.71 |
Q1 2011 | 9.18 | 2.58 | 11.76 |
Q2 2011 | 9.14 | 2.58 | 11.72 |
Q3 2011 | 9.04 | 2.62 | 11.66 |
Q4 2011 | 8.90 | 2.63 | 11.53 |
Q1 2012 | 8.80 | 2.64 | 11.44 |
Q2 2012 | 8.74 | 2.64 | 11.38 |
Q3 2012 | 8.60 | 2.71 | 11.31 |
Q4 2012 | 8.59 | 2.75 | 11.34 |
Q1 2013 | 8.48 | 2.75 | 11.23 |
Q2 2013 | 8.38 | 2.77 | 11.15 |
Q3 2013 | 8.44 | 2.85 | 11.29 |
Q4 2013 | 8.58 | 2.94 | 11.52 |
Q1 2014 | 8.70 | 2.96 | 11.66 |
Q2 2014 | 8.62 | 3.02 | 11.64 |
Q3 2014 | 8.64 | 3.07 | 11.71 |
Q4 2014 | 8.68 | 3.16 | 11.84 |
Q1 2015 | 8.68 | 3.17 | 11.85 |
Q2 2015 | 8.62 | 3.24 | 11.86 |
Q3 2015 | 8.75 | 3.31 | 12.06 |
Q4 2015 | 8.74 | 3.37 | 12.11 |
Q1 2016 | 8.86 | 3.39 | 12.25 |
Q2 2016 | 8.84 | 3.45 | 12.29 |
Q3 2016 | 8.82 | 3.54 | 12.36 |
Q4 2016 | 8.95 | 3.63 | 12.58 |
Q1 2017 | 9.09 | 3.64 | 12.73 |
Q2 2017 | 9.14 | 3.69 | 12.83 |
Q3 2017 | 9.19 | 3.77 | 12.96 |
Q4 2017 | 9.32 | 3.82 | 13.14 |
Q1 2018 | 9.38 | 3.85 | 13.23 |
Q2 2018 | 9.43 | 3.87 | 13.30 |
Q3 2018 | 9.56 | 3.95 | 13.51 |
Q4 2018 | 9.53 | 4.01 | 13.54 |
Q1 2019 | 9.65 | 4.02 | 13.67 |
Q2 2019 | 9.81 | 4.06 | 13.87 |
Q3 2019 | 9.84 | 4.13 | 13.97 |
Q4 2019 | 9.95 | 4.20 | 14.15 |
Q1 2020 | 10.10 | 4.21 | 14.31 |
Q2 2020 | 10.15 | 4.12 | 14.27 |
Q3 2020 | 10.22 | 4.14 | 14.36 |
Q4 2020 | 10.39 | 4.17 | 14.56 |
Q1 2021 | 10.50 | 4.14 | 14.64 |
Q2 2021 | 10.76 | 4.20 | 14.96 |
Q3 2021 | 10.99 | 4.24 | 15.23 |
Q4 2021 | 11.25 | 4.34 | 15.59 |
Source: Federal Reserve
Trends in Housing Debt
Home prices have experienced upward pressure since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is evidenced by the Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index, which has increased by 34% since the start of the pandemic.
Driving this growth are various pandemic-related impacts. For example, the cost of materials such as lumber have seen enormous spikes. We’ve covered this story in a previous graphic, which showed how many homes could be built with $50,000 worth of lumber. In most cases, these higher costs are passed on to the consumer.
Another key factor here is mortgage rates, which fell to all-time lows in 2020. When rates are low, consumers are able to borrow in larger quantities. This increases the demand for homes, which in turn inflates prices.
Ultimately, higher home prices translate to more mortgage debt being incurred by families.
No Need to Worry, Though
Economists believe that today’s housing debt isn’t a cause for concern. This is because the quality of borrowers is much stronger than it was between 2003 and 2007, in the years leading up to the financial crisis and subsequent housing crash.
In the chart below, subprime borrowers (those with a credit score of 620 and below) are represented by the red-shaded bars:
We can see that subprime borrowers represent very little (2%) of today’s total originations compared to the period between 2003 to 2007 (12%). This suggests that American homeowners are, on average, less likely to default on their mortgage.
Economists have also noted a decline in the household debt service ratio, which measures the percentage of disposable income that goes towards a mortgage. This is shown in the table below, along with the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate.
Year | Mortgage Payments as a % of Disposable Income | Average 30-Year Fixed Mortgage Rate |
---|---|---|
2000 | 12.0% | 8.2% |
2004 | 12.2% | 5.4% |
2008 | 12.8% | 5.8% |
2012 | 9.8% | 3.9% |
2016 | 9.9% | 3.7% |
2020 | 9.4% | 3.5% |
2021 | 9.3% | 3.2% |
Source: Federal Reserve
While it’s true that Americans are less burdened by their mortgages, we must acknowledge the decrease in mortgage rates that took place over the same period.
With the Fed now increasing rates to calm inflation, Americans could see their mortgages begin to eat up a larger chunk of their paycheck. In fact, mortgage rates have already risen for seven consecutive weeks.
Trends in Non-Housing Consumer Debt
The key stories in non-housing consumer debt are student loans and auto loans.
The former category of debt has grown substantially over the past two decades, with growth tapering off during the pandemic. This can be attributed to COVID relief measures which have temporarily lowered the interest rate on direct federal student loans to 0%.
Additionally, these loans were placed into forbearance, meaning 37 million borrowers have not been required to make payments. As of April 2022, the value of these waived payments has reached $195 billion.
Over the course of the pandemic, very few direct federal borrowers have made voluntary payments to reduce their loan principal. When payments eventually resume, and the 0% interest rate is reverted, economists believe that delinquencies could rise significantly.
Auto loans, on the other hand, are following a similar trajectory as mortgages. Both new and used car prices have risen due to the global chip shortage, which is hampering production across the entire industry.
To put this in numbers, the average price of a new car has climbed from $35,600 in 2019, to over $47,000 today. Over a similar timeframe, the average price of a used car has grown from $19,800, to over $28,000.
Markets
Why Investors Tuned Out Netflix
Disappointing results have pushed Netflix shares down by over 60% year-to-date. This infographic puts the company’s rocky year into perspective.

Why Investors Tuned Out Netflix
Netflix shares have enjoyed an incredible run over the past decade. Subscriber growth seemed limitless, profitability was improving, and the pandemic gave us a compelling case for watching TV at home.
Things took a drastic turn on April 19, 2022, when Netflix announced its Q1 results. Rather than gaining subscribers as forecasted, the company lost 200,000. This was the first decline in over a decade, and investors rushed to pull their money out.
So, is there a buying opportunity now that Netflix shares are trading at multi-year lows? To help you decide, we’ve provided further context around this historic crash.
Netflix Shares Fall Flat
Over the span of a few months, Netflix shares have erased roughly four years worth of gains. Not all of these losses are due to the drop in subscribers, however.
Prior to the Q1 earnings announcement, Netflix had lost most of its pandemic-related gains. This was primarily due to rising interest rates and people spending less time at home. Still, analysts expected Netflix to add 2.7 million subscribers.
After announcing it had lost 200,000 subscribers instead, the stock quickly fell below $200 (the first time since late 2017). YTD performance (as of April 29, 2022) is an abysmal -67%.
What’s to Blame?
Netflix pointed to three culprits for its loss in subscribers:
- The suspension of its services in Russia
- Increasing competition
- Account sharing
Let’s focus on the latter two, starting with competition. The following table compares the number of subscribers between Netflix and two prominent rivals: Disney+ and HBO.
Date | Netflix Subscribers | Disney+ Subscribers | HBO & HBO Max Subscribers |
---|---|---|---|
Q1 2020 | 182.8M | 26.5M | 53.8M |
Q2 2020 | 192.9M | 33.5M | 55.5M |
Q3 2020 | 195.1M | 60.5M | 56.9M |
Q4 2020 | 203.6M | 73.7M | 60.6M |
Q1 2021 | 207.6M | 94.9M | 63.9M |
Q2 2021 | 209.2M | 103.6M | 67.5M |
Q3 2021 | 213.6M | 116.0M | 69.4M |
Q4 2021 | 221.8M | 118.1M | 73.8M |
Q1 2022 | 221.6M | 129.8M | 76.8M |
Disney+ was launched in November 2019, while HBO Max was launched in May 2020. HBO (the channel) and HBO Max subscribers are rolled up as one.
Based on this data, Netflix may be starting to feel the heat of competition. A loss in subscribers is bad news, but it’s even worse when competitors report growth over the same time period.
Keep in mind that we’re only talking about a single quarter, and not a long-term trend. It’s too early to say whether Netflix is actually losing ground, though the company has warned it could shed another 2 million subscribers by July.
Next is account sharing, which according to Netflix, amounts to 100 million non-paying households. This is spread out across the entire world, but if we use the company’s U.S. pricing as a benchmark, it translates to between $1 to $2 billion in lost revenue.
Growth is Everything
In the tech sector, growth is everything. If Netflix can’t return to posting consecutive quarters of subscriber growth, it could be many years before the stock returns to its previous high.
“We’ve definitely seen that once you get to 70, 80 millions of subs, things really tend to slow down. We saw it with HBO, and we’ve seen the same issues with Disney. They’re hitting the upper limit on the big growth.”
– David Campo, NYU
Regaining that momentum is going to be difficult, but Netflix does have plans. To address password sharing, the service may charge a fee for out-of-household profiles that are added to an account. The specifics around enforcement are vague, but Netflix is also considering a lower-priced subscription plan that includes advertising.
Only time will tell if these strategies can stop the bleeding, or perhaps even boost profitability. Rampant inflation, which might persuade consumers to cut down on their subscriptions, could be a source of additional headwinds.
-
Misc5 days ago
The Top 10 Largest Nuclear Explosions, Visualized
-
Technology3 weeks ago
How Do Big Tech Giants Make Their Billions?
-
Green4 weeks ago
Visualizing All Electric Car Models Available in the U.S.
-
Markets4 weeks ago
Satellite Maps: Shanghai’s Supply Chain Standstill
-
Energy1 week ago
Mapped: Solar and Wind Power by Country
-
Datastream3 weeks ago
Visualizing Companies with the Most Patents Granted in 2021
-
Technology1 week ago
Synthetic Biology: The $3.6 Trillion Science Changing Life as We Know It
-
Markets3 weeks ago
Why Investors Tuned Out Netflix