Cities
The 100 Most Popular City Destinations
The 100 Most Popular City Destinations
The pandemic has grounded many of us, but it can’t curb human wanderlust.
Cities like Hong Kong, Bangkok, and London have led city destination rankings for years, but movement within the ranks below them—revealed in the above infographic—help to highlight the intriguing travel trends happening before COVID-19.
With data from Euromonitor International’s 2019 travel report, we can uncover where travelers are likely headed once their passports are useful again. Pulling data from 400 cities, collected into mid-2019, the report encompasses millions of international travelers who stayed at their destination longer than 24 hours.
Here’s a closer look at where travelers are likely to touch down in post-pandemic life.
Not-So-Lonely At the Top
Although the top of this list has remained fairly stable in terms of rank in recent years, two cities have seen an impressive influx of travelers.
Paris and Istanbul both made significant gains between 2017 and 2019 with 20.6% and 37.2% growth in visitors respectively:
Note that only one North American city, New York City, is found in this top 10. As well, Asian cities account for half of the leading group, with two of the top 10 cities are located in China. Although Hong Kong leads the top 100 list, political turmoil led to a marked decline of international visitors of 4.2% from 2017 to 2019.
The largest rank changes in the top 10 were made by Macau and Istanbul, but the rise was subtle. Both cities gained two spots each between 2013 and 2018, though each had sizable traveler growth rates, with Macau growing by 19.0%.
Rank | City | Country | Arrivals (Millions) | 5yr Rank Change | Growth ('17-19) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hong Kong | China (SAR) | 29.26 | — | -4.2% |
2 | Bangkok | Thailand | 24.17 | — | 15.1% |
3 | London | United Kingdom | 19.23 | — | -1.4% |
4 | Macau | China (SAR) | 18.93 | 2 | 19.0% |
5 | Singapore | Singapore | 18.55 | -1 | 12.2% |
6 | Paris | France | 17.56 | -1 | 20.6% |
7 | Dubai | UAE | 15.92 | — | 3.4% |
8 | New York City | US | 13.60 | 1 | 7.0% |
9 | Kuala Lumpur | Malaysia | 13.43 | 1 | 9.6% |
10 | Istanbul | Turkey | 13.43 | 2 | 37.2% |
11 | Delhi | India | 12.65 | 30 | 49.6% |
12 | Antalya | Turkey | 12.44 | -1 | 40.6% |
13 | Shenzhen | China | 12.20 | -5 | 2.0% |
14 | Mumbai | India | 10.59 | 28 | 38.5% |
15 | Phuket | Thailand | 10.55 | — | 8.4% |
16 | Rome | Italy | 10.07 | -3 | 8.3% |
17 | Tokyo | Japan | 9.99 | 15 | 9.3% |
18 | Pattaya | Thailand | 9.61 | -1 | 8.9% |
19 | Taipei | Taiwan, China | 9.60 | -1 | 7.7% |
20 | Mecca | Saudi Arabia | 9.57 | 1 | 0.3% |
21 | Guangzhou | China | 9.00 | -5 | 0.1% |
22 | Prague | Czechia | 8.95 | -3 | 3.9% |
23 | Medina | Saudi Arabia | 8.55 | 1 | 0.7% |
24 | Seoul | South Korea | 8.43 | -10 | 19.1% |
25 | Amsterdam | Netherlands | 8.35 | 3 | 12.6% |
26 | Agra | India | 8.14 | 38 | 52.6% |
27 | Miami | US | 8.12 | -7 | 6.9% |
28 | Osaka | Japan | 7.86 | 69 | 36.2% |
29 | Los Angeles | US | 7.50 | -7 | 7.8% |
30 | Shanghai | China | 7.48 | -7 | 7.8% |
31 | Ho Chi Minh City | Vietnam | 7.20 | 6 | 31.6% |
32 | Denpasar | Indonesia | 7.19 | 13 | 37.5% |
33 | Barcelona | Spain | 6.71 | -6 | 11.6% |
34 | Las Vegas | US | 6.59 | -9 | -0.8% |
35 | Milan | Italy | 6.48 | -9 | 3.9% |
36 | Chennai | India | 6.42 | 7 | 55.8% |
37 | Vienna | Austria | 6.41 | -8 | 7.1% |
38 | Johor Bahru | Malaysia | 6.40 | 8 | 29.8% |
39 | Jaipur | India | 6.38 | 29 | 42.9% |
40 | Cancun | Mexico | 6.04 | 17 | 1.8% |
41 | Berlin | Germany | 5.96 | -10 | 10.1% |
42 | Cairo | Egypt | 5.75 | 18 | 55.1% |
43 | Athens | Greece | 5.73 | 18 | 31.3% |
44 | Orlando | US | 5.55 | -10 | 8.7% |
45 | Moscow | Russia | 5.51 | -10 | 24.4% |
46 | Venice | Italy | 5.50 | -16 | 5.3% |
47 | Madrid | Spain | 5.44 | -8 | 6.3% |
48 | Ha Long | Vietnam | 5.29 | 14 | 44.0% |
49 | Riyadh | Saudi Arabia | 5.27 | -9 | 0.9% |
50 | Dublin | Ireland | 5.21 | -12 | 9.4% |
51 | Florence | Italy | 5.06 | -15 | 3.9% |
52 | Ha Noi | Vietnam | 4.69 | 21 | 19.3% |
53 | Toronto | Canada | 4.51 | — | 10.5% |
54 | Johannesburg | South Africa | 4.12 | -10 | 3.4% |
55 | Sydney | Australia | 4.09 | 1 | 12.1% |
56 | Munich | Germany | 4.06 | -7 | 11.0% |
57 | Jakarta | Indonesia | 4.03 | 17 | 30.9% |
58 | Beijing | China | 4.00 | -25 | 3.8% |
59 | St. Petersburg | Russia | 4.00 | -11 | 23.9% |
60 | Brussels | Belgium | 3.94 | -13 | 24.8% |
61 | Jerusalem | Israel | 3.93 | -9 | 27.0% |
62 | Budapest | Hungary | 3.82 | -7 | 10.4% |
63 | Lisbon | Portugal | 3.54 | 9 | 3.4% |
64 | Dammam | Saudi Arabia | 3.50 | -14 | 0.3% |
65 | Penang Island | Malaysia | 3.44 | -2 | 16.3% |
66 | Heraklion | Greece | 3.40 | -1 | -3.8% |
67 | Kyoto | Japan | 3.29 | 58 | 4.4% |
68 | Zhuhai | China | 3.26 | -9 | 4.4% |
69 | Vancouver | Canada | 3.21 | 13 | 13.3% |
70 | Chiang Mai | Thailand | 3.20 | 6 | 4.2% |
71 | Copenhagen | Denmark | 3.07 | 8 | 7.8% |
72 | San Francisco | US | 2.90 | -14 | 3.1% |
73 | Melbourne | Australia | 2.89 | 12 | 20.9% |
74 | Krakow | Poland | 2.85 | -8 | 3.9% |
75 | Marrakech | Morocco | 2.84 | 2 | 13.1% |
76 | Kolkatta | India | 2.83 | 14 | 22.3% |
77 | Cebu | Philippines | 2.81 | 51 | -4.2% |
78 | Auckland | New Zealand | 2.80 | 6 | 9.7% |
79 | Tel Aviv | Israel | 2.78 | -8 | 16.0% |
80 | Guilin | China | 2.75 | 29 | 19.7% |
81 | Honolulu | US | 2.74 | -11 | 6.0% |
82 | Hurgada | Egypt | 2.74 | 45 | 108.1% |
83 | Warsaw | Poland | 2.73 | -16 | 7.2% |
84 | Mugla | Turkey | 2.72 | -33 | 47.5% |
85 | Buenos Aires City | Argentina | 2.69 | -31 | 8.6% |
86 | Chiba | Japan | 2.68 | 106 | 14.4% |
87 | Frankfurt | Germany | 2.64 | -7 | 9.2% |
88 | Stockholm | Sweden | 2.60 | — | 10.1% |
89 | Lima | Peru | 2.54 | -11 | 17.5% |
90 | Da Nang | Vietnam | 2.51 | 72 | 44.0% |
91 | Batam | Indonesia | 2.49 | 20 | 27.8% |
92 | Nice | France | 2.47 | -17 | 10.7% |
93 | Fukuoka | Japan | 2.44 | 104 | 24.6% |
94 | Abu Dhabi | UAE | 2.40 | 12 | 14.7% |
95 | Jeju | South Korea | 2.35 | -8 | -6.2% |
96 | Porto | Portugal | 2.34 | 22 | 11.7% |
97 | Rhodes | Greece | 2.34 | -11 | 10.6% |
98 | Rio de Janeiro | Brazil | 2.28 | -7 | 3.6% |
99 | Krabi | Thailand | 2.26 | -5 | 12.7% |
100 | Bangalore | India | 2.24 | 83 | 50.6% |
It’s also worth noting that based on the data collected into 2019, London was projected to continue its downward trend, bringing it to 5th spot—mostly due to complications brought on by Brexit and associated visa restrictions.
Trending: Indian and Japanese Cities Take Flight
Most of the dramatic shifts in city travel patterns are happening below the top 10. Asian hot spots are gaining steam and swiftly making their way up the top 100 rankings, signaling a shift in global preferences before lockdowns began.
Take Japan for instance. The five Japanese cities in the top 100 rose by 352 places collectively since 2013. The country’s top city destinations have had an average traveler growth rate of 17.8% from 2017 to 2019. In light of Japan’s impeccable containment of COVID-19, that trend may be compounded in coming years.
Japan’s dramatic rise in the ranks is echoed by India. India’s seven cities in the top 100 have risen 229 places — with a huge average growth rate of 44.6% from 2017 to 2019. Some of that growth is the result of lifestyle tourism, particularly in the case of Delhi, which saw its traveler rate grow by 49.6% since 2017.
Prior to the pandemic, Delhi was expected to continue that steady growth and experience a leap in rank, which currently sits at 11.
With health and wellness tourism on the rise, India has gained noteworthy attention for its yoga retreats and Ayurveda practices. Delhi’s connectivity to important locations across North India has boosted inbound arrivals to the city.
— Euromonitor International
Where in the World? Asia and Europe
Asia continues to lead all other regions, followed by Europe.
Since 2013, the number of Asian cities in the top 100 has grown from 34 to 43. Asian outbound travel has also seen a surge, spurring a rise in travel campaigns from Europe and the Americas that target Asian travelers on social media platforms like WeChat.
Why the Ranking Matters: In Travel, They Trust
Before the pandemic, tourism was considered a leading and resilient economic sector.
In 2019, 1.5 billion people traveled internationally. By 2030, that number could grow to 1.8 billion—and many cities could become increasingly reliant on tourist dollars.
According to the World Travel and Tourism Council, cities like Macau, Cancun, Marrakech, and Las Vegas are all heavily dependent on direct tourism and travel contributions to their respective GDPs. As of 2018, more than 50% of Macau’s GDP was derived directly from tourism, while almost half of Cancun’s GDP relies on travelers.
Countries like India and the Philippines are also particularly reliant on travel. India has a related job-to-tourist ratio of two jobs for every tourist and the Philippines has a ratio of one job per tourist.
By 2030, there could be 1.8 billion tourists – just over one in five persons in the world–traveling around the globe.
— United Nations World Tourism Organization
Where to Next? Wheels Up
Millions of travelers don’t lie — the siren call of cities is undeniable. In turn, those tourists have become a major lifeforce for many of these destinations, and a boon for the international travel industry.
The pandemic has thrown these dynamics off course, with much of the world grinding to a halt since early 2020. However, it’s only a matter of time before the world opens back up again.
Although travel may look very different in the future, wanderlust doesn’t simply disappear. In fact, frustrated travelers — including digital nomads and remote workers — may have all the more reason to run away.
Crime
Mapped: The Safest Cities in the U.S.
How safe is small town America? This map reveals the safest cities in the U.S. in terms of the total crime rate per every 1,000 residents.

Mapped: The Safest Cities in America
The phrase “small town America” often conjures up images of white picket fences, well-trimmed lawns, and big houses. But how safe is modern-day suburbia in America?
Some of the smallest places in the country can actually be among the most dangerous. Take for example Bessemer, Alabama, with a population of around 26,000 and a violent crime rate of 33.1 per every 1,000 residents.
That said, there are many small cities that are true havens for families across the United States. This map showcases the safest cities in the U.S., using FBI data and Census Bureau populations compiled by NeighborhoodScout in 2023.
Note: The source only considered cities with a population of 25,000 or higher. This report is based on total index crimes reported in each city, which includes arson, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, murder, rape, armed robbery, and aggravated assault.
Top 100 Safest Cities in the U.S.
40% of the cities in the ranking are located in Northeastern states, which are typically rated the “safest” based on FBI data.
Here’s a closer look at the full list:
Rank | City | State | Total Crime Rate(per 1,000 residents) | Chance of Beinga Victim |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ridgefield | Connecticut | 1.9 | 1 in 510 |
2 | Franklin | Massachusetts | 2.9 | 1 in 344 |
3 | Lake in the Hills | Illinois | 3.1 | 1 in 321 |
4 | Marshfield | Massachusetts | 3.3 | 1 in 300 |
5 | Arlington | Massachusetts | 3.4 | 1 in 292 |
6 | Fulshear | Texas | 3.6 | 1 in 276 |
7 | Zionsville | Indiana | 3.6 | 1 in 275 |
8 | Lexington | Massachusetts | 3.7 | 1 in 270 |
9 | Muskego | Wisconsin | 3.8 | 1 in 265 |
10 | Rexburg | Idaho | 3.9 | 1 in 253 |
11 | Independence | Kentucky | 3.9 | 1 in 253 |
12 | Oswego | Illinois | 4.1 | 1 in 238 |
13 | Milton | Massachusetts | 4.2 | 1 in 233 |
14 | Needham | Massachusetts | 4.2 | 1 in 233 |
15 | White Lake | Michigan | 4.2 | 1 in 233 |
16 | Avon Lake | Ohio | 4.3 | 1 in 232 |
17 | Madison | Mississippi | 4.5 | 1 in 221 |
18 | Wakefield | Massachusetts | 4.5 | 1 in 218 |
19 | Windsor | Colorado | 4.5 | 1 in 218 |
20 | South Kingstown | Rhode Island | 4.7 | 1 in 212 |
21 | Colleyville | Texas | 4.8 | 1 in 206 |
22 | West Bloomfield | Michigan | 4.9 | 1 in 204 |
23 | Johns Creek | Georgia | 4.9 | 1 in 202 |
24 | Billerica | Massachusetts | 5.1 | 1 in 195 |
25 | Mason | Ohio | 5.1 | 1 in 192 |
26 | Reading | Massachusetts | 5.1 | 1 in 192 |
27 | North Andover | Massachusetts | 5.2 | 1 in 190 |
28 | Wellesley | Massachusetts | 5.2 | 1 in 189 |
29 | Mundelein | Illinois | 5.3 | 1 in 187 |
30 | Brandon | Mississippi | 5.3 | 1 in 186 |
31 | Cumberland | Rhode Island | 5.4 | 1 in 184 |
32 | Andover | Massachusetts | 5.4 | 1 in 182 |
33 | Edwardsville | Illinois | 5.5 | 1 in 178 |
34 | Little Elm | Texas | 5.6 | 1 in 176 |
35 | Merrimack | New Hampshire | 5.7 | 1 in 172 |
36 | Waltham | Massachusetts | 5.8 | 1 in 169 |
37 | Wylie | Texas | 5.9 | 1 in 169 |
38 | Commerce Township | Michigan | 5.9 | 1 in 169 |
39 | Milton | Georgia | 5.9 | 1 in 167 |
40 | Melrose | Massachusetts | 6.0 | 1 in 164 |
41 | Ballwin | Missouri | 6.1 | 1 in 162 |
42 | North Kingstown | Rhode Island | 6.1 | 1 in 162 |
43 | Beverly | Massachusetts | 6.2 | 1 in 161 |
44 | Rochester Hills | Michigan | 6.2 | 1 in 160 |
45 | Keller | Texas | 6.3 | 1 in 158 |
46 | Shrewsbury | Massachusetts | 6.4 | 1 in 156 |
47 | Dracut | Massachusetts | 6.4 | 1 in 155 |
48 | Prosper | Texas | 6.4 | 1 in 155 |
49 | Newton | Massachusetts | 6.5 | 1 in 152 |
50 | Friendswood | Texas | 6.5 | 1 in 152 |
51 | McHenry | Illinois | 6.5 | 1 in 152 |
52 | Fort Mill | South Carolina | 6.6 | 1 in 151 |
53 | Wallingford | Connecticut | 6.8 | 1 in 146 |
54 | Caledonia | Wisconsin | 6.9 | 1 in 144 |
55 | Belmont | Massachusetts | 6.9 | 1 in 144 |
56 | De Pere | Wisconsin | 6.9 | 1 in 143 |
57 | Flower Mound | Texas | 7.0 | 1 in 142 |
58 | Easton | Massachusetts | 7.0 | 1 in 141 |
59 | Highland Park | Illinois | 7.0 | 1 in 141 |
60 | Carmel | Indiana | 7.2 | 1 in 138 |
61 | Sachse | Texas | 7.2 | 1 in 138 |
62 | Algonquin | Illinois | 7.2 | 1 in 137 |
63 | Hendersonville | Tennessee | 7.2 | 1 in 137 |
64 | San Luis | Arizona | 7.3 | 1 in 136 |
65 | Fishers | Indiana | 7.3 | 1 in 135 |
66 | Perrysburg | Ohio | 7.4 | 1 in 135 |
67 | Lake Stevens | Washington | 7.4 | 1 in 134 |
68 | Cheshire | Connecticut | 7.4 | 1 in 134 |
69 | Milford | Massachusetts | 7.5 | 1 in 132 |
70 | Saratoga Springs | Utah | 7.5 | 1 in 132 |
71 | Bella Vista | Arkansas | 7.5 | 1 in 132 |
72 | Princeton | New Jersey | 7.5 | 1 in 131 |
73 | Bluffton | South Carolina | 7.6 | 1 in 130 |
74 | Novi | Michigan | 7.6 | 1 in 130 |
75 | Chelmsford | Massachusetts | 7.6 | 1 in 130 |
76 | Amherst | Massachusetts | 7.7 | 1 in 129 |
77 | Rosemount | Minnesota | 7.7 | 1 in 129 |
78 | Gloucester | Massachusetts | 7.7 | 1 in 129 |
79 | Syracuse | Utah | 7.8 | 1 in 127 |
80 | Waukee | Iowa | 7.8 | 1 in 126 |
81 | Mequon | Wisconsin | 7.9 | 1 in 126 |
82 | Westfield | Indiana | 7.9 | 1 in 126 |
83 | Spring Hill | Tennessee | 7.9 | 1 in 126 |
84 | Upper Arlington | Ohio | 7.9 | 1 in 126 |
85 | Rahway | New Jersey | 7.9 | 1 in 125 |
86 | Montclair | New Jersey | 7.9 | 1 in 125 |
87 | Greenwich | Connecticut | 8.0 | 1 in 125 |
88 | Hutto | Texas | 8.0 | 1 in 124 |
89 | Vestavia Hills | Alabama | 8.0 | 1 in 123 |
90 | Brownsburg | Indiana | 8.1 | 1 in 123 |
91 | Wilmette | Illinois | 8.1 | 1 in 123 |
92 | New Milford | Connecticut | 8.1 | 1 in 122 |
93 | Hilliard | Ohio | 8.2 | 1 in 120 |
94 | Royal Oak | Michigan | 8.2 | 1 in 120 |
95 | Derry | New Hampshire | 8.3 | 1 in 121 |
96 | Dublin | Ohio | 8.3 | 1 in 120 |
97 | West Warwick | Rhode Island | 8.5 | 1 in 116 |
98 | Watertown | Massachusetts | 8.5 | 1 in 116 |
99 | Walpole | Massachusetts | 8.6 | 1 in 115 |
100 | Kaysville | Utah | 8.6 | 1 in 115 |
One quarter of the safest cities are located in Massachusetts, with the vast majority clustered around Boston.
The median population of the cities and towns in the top 100 is just 32,000, and few widely-recognized cities make the list. Carmel, Indiana (#60) is the only city with a population above 100,000 to make the rankings. This would seem to follow the logic that bigger cities are more dangerous, but our map covering the most dangerous cities in America shows that many small cities were just as dangerous, and some even more.
Regardless, small towns can truly be idyllic. For example, a person’s chance of falling victim to crime in Ridgefield, Connecticut, the safest ranked city in the U.S., is just 1-in-510. That’s an overall rate of fewer than two incidents of crime per every 1,000 residents.
One surprising observation from the data is that many of the safest U.S. cities are in very close proximity to some of the most dangerous.
One example that illustrates this is Detroit, which ranks as the sixth most dangerous city in America. Despite this, as shown on the map above, there are four communities nearby that have some of the lowest crime rates in America.
In other words, America’s metro areas contain much contrast, and these insights provide valuable information for individuals and families seeking secure places to live across the country.
-
Culture3 weeks ago
Ranked: Which Countries Drink the Most Beer?
-
Markets1 week ago
Mapped: The Migration of the World’s Millionaires in 2023
-
Maps3 weeks ago
Mapped: The Deadliest Earthquakes of the 21st Century
-
Countries1 week ago
Charted: The World’s Biggest Oil Producers
-
Energy3 weeks ago
What Electricity Sources Power the World?
-
Technology6 days ago
Which Companies Own the Most Satellites?
-
Markets3 weeks ago
The 25 Worst Stocks by Shareholder Wealth Losses (1926-2022)
-
Mining5 days ago
200 Years of Global Gold Production, by Country