Datastream
One Year In: How the Pandemic Impacted Employment Around the World
Published
4 years agoon
By
Avery Koop
Yes. Visualizations are free to share and post in their original form across the web—even for publishers. Please link back to this page and attribute Visual Capitalist.

Licenses are required for some commercial uses, translations, or layout modifications. You can even whitelabel our visualizations. Explore your options.

Click here to license this visualization.
The Briefing
- The global pandemic had a significant impact on average working hours across the globe
- In 2020, 8.8% of global working hours were lost compared to Q4’2019
- The amount of working hours lost in 2020 is equal to 255 million full-time jobs
How the Pandemic Impacted Employment Around the World
One year in, the global pandemic has impacted employment and changed the nature of work in a multitude of ways.
As job loss rose across the globe, many countries introduced job retention schemes to steady unemployment rates. At the same time, working hours for many who held on to their jobs were reduced.
To put it in perspective, COVID-19’s negative impact on working hours globally has been around 4x more than that caused by the Global Financial Crisis in 2009.
Working Hard or Hardly Working?
As of January 2021, an estimated 93% of the world’s workforce lives in a country with some type of workplace closure restrictions still in place.
While profits were slashed across many industries, a majority of companies actually avoided firing people. However, 64% of firms either reduced wages, hours, or furloughed workers temporarily.
Compared to Q4’2019, total global working hours were reduced 8.8% in 2020. This is equivalent to approximately 255 million jobs.
Here’s a look at the working hour losses in a number of different countries.
Country | 2020 Work Hour Losses Compared to Q4'2019 |
---|---|
Peru | 27.5% |
Honduras | 24.3% |
Panama | 23.5% |
Argentina | 21.0% |
Colombia | 20.9% |
Bolivia | 20.5% |
El Salvador | 19.4% |
Ecuador | 17.6% |
Costa Rica | 17.5% |
Nepal | 17.4% |
Armenia | 16.8% |
Chile | 16.7% |
Guatemala | 16.4% |
Kuwait | 16.4% |
Dominican Republic | 15.5% |
Brazil | 14.9% |
Bahamas | 14.8% |
Eritrea | 14.7% |
Turkey | 14.7% |
Cyprus | 14.6% |
Azerbaijan | 14.1% |
Morocco | 14.1% |
North Macedonia | 13.8% |
India | 13.7% |
Venezuela | 13.7% |
Philippines | 13.6% |
South Africa | 13.6% |
Italy | 13.5% |
Myanmar | 13.4% |
Portugal | 13.4% |
Cape Verde | 13.3% |
Spain | 13.2% |
Georgia | 13.1% |
Oman | 13.1% |
United States Virgin Islands | 13.0% |
Moldova | 12.9% |
Slovakia | 12.8% |
United Kingdom | 12.8% |
Greece | 12.6% |
Cuba | 12.5% |
Guyana | 12.5% |
Ireland | 12.5% |
Mexico | 12.5% |
Bangladesh | 12.2% |
Uganda | 12.2% |
Bhutan | 11.9% |
Suriname | 11.8% |
Kyrgyzstan | 11.7% |
Algeria | 11.6% |
Kazakhstan | 11.5% |
Maldives | 11.4% |
Paraguay | 11.4% |
Jamaica | 11.3% |
Trinidad and Tobago | 11.3% |
Uruguay | 11.2% |
Belize | 11.1% |
Malaysia | 11.1% |
Iraq | 10.8% |
Malta | 10.6% |
Austria | 10.5% |
Barbados | 10.4% |
Jordan | 10.4% |
Lebanon | 10.3% |
Eswatini | 9.9% |
Sri Lanka | 9.9% |
Saint Lucia | 9.8% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 9.7% |
Guam | 9.6% |
Egypt | 9.5% |
Ethiopia | 9.5% |
Kenya | 9.5% |
Qatar | 9.5% |
Rwanda | 9.4% |
Canada | 9.3% |
Congo | 9.3% |
Libya | 9.3% |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 9.3% |
United Arab Emirates | 9.3% |
Israel | 9.2% |
Pakistan | 9.2% |
United States | 9.2% |
Sudan | 9.1% |
Zimbabwe | 9.1% |
Bahrain | 9.0% |
Liberia | 9.0% |
Guinea-Bissau | 8.9% |
Nigeria | 8.9% |
Sao Tome and Principe | 8.9% |
Romania | 8.8% |
Ukraine | 8.8% |
South Sudan | 8.7% |
Angola | 8.6% |
Hong Kong | 8.6% |
Puerto Rico | 8.6% |
Equatorial Guinea | 8.5% |
Russia | 8.5% |
Uzbekistan | 8.5% |
Chad | 8.4% |
France | 8.4% |
Gabon | 8.3% |
Saudi Arabia | 8.3% |
Indonesia | 8.2% |
Western Sahara | 8.2% |
Slovenia | 8.0% |
Montenegro | 7.8% |
Singapore | 7.8% |
Syria | 7.8% |
Gambia | 7.7% |
Guinea | 7.6% |
Haiti | 7.6% |
Serbia | 7.5% |
Lesotho | 7.4% |
Tonga | 7.4% |
Belgium | 7.3% |
Comoros | 7.1% |
Madagascar | 6.9% |
Djibouti | 6.8% |
Mauritius | 6.7% |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | 6.6% |
Afghanistan | 6.5% |
Botswana | 6.4% |
Fiji | 6.3% |
Germany | 6.3% |
Iceland | 6.3% |
Senegal | 6.3% |
Lithuania | 6.1% |
Bulgaria | 6.0% |
Tunisia | 6.0% |
Channel Islands | 5.9% |
Iran | 5.9% |
Namibia | 5.9% |
French Polynesia | 5.7% |
Croatia | 5.5% |
Japan | 5.4% |
Mauritania | 5.3% |
Vanuatu | 5.3% |
Hungary | 5.2% |
Mozambique | 5.2% |
Sweden | 5.2% |
Vietnam | 5.2% |
Malawi | 5.1% |
Central African Republic | 5.0% |
Togo | 4.9% |
Cambodia | 4.8% |
Samoa | 4.8% |
Australia | 4.7% |
Ghana | 4.7% |
Estonia | 4.5% |
Thailand | 4.5% |
Brunei Darussalam | 4.4% |
North Korea | 4.4% |
Czech Republic | 4.3% |
Laos | 4.3% |
Netherlands | 4.3% |
Cameroon | 4.2% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 4.2% |
China | 4.1% |
Albania | 3.9% |
Taiwan | 3.9% |
Sierra Leone | 3.8% |
Switzerland | 3.8% |
Turkmenistan | 3.8% |
South Korea | 3.7% |
Luxembourg | 3.7% |
Nicaragua | 3.7% |
New Caledonia | 3.5% |
Poland | 3.5% |
Denmark | 3.3% |
Latvia | 3.3% |
Mali | 3.3% |
Benin | 3.2% |
Tajikistan | 3.2% |
Timor-Leste | 2.7% |
Burkina Faso | 2.6% |
Zambia | 2.6% |
Mongolia | 2.5% |
Norway | 2.5% |
Somalia | 2.5% |
Macau | 1.9% |
Papua New Guinea | 1.8% |
Solomon Islands | 1.8% |
Tanzania | 1.8% |
Belarus | 1.3% |
Finland | 1.3% |
Yemen | 1.3% |
Niger | 1.1% |
New Zealand | 0.8% |
Burundi | -0.1% |
The loss of working hours has impacted Southern Europe, South Asia, the Americas, and the Caribbean most significantly. Not surprisingly, these regions are all heavily reliant on tourism and hospitality to fuel their economies.
Job Losses and the Future of Work
Working hour losses, however, do not just come from reductions in hours. The ILO approximates that the blame for working hour losses can be shared equally, with around half due to job losses and half due to a reduction in working hours.
Worldwide employment losses in 2020 were equal to 114 million jobs.
However, a large number of people have notably been deemed ‘inactive,’ rather than unemployed, reducing the global labor force participation rate overall.
Although a rebound in working hours and jobs is expected in 2021, the pandemic’s effects on how we work, and the kinds jobs that are available will have a deeper long-term effect on the global labor force participation.
» Want to learn more? Check out our COVID-19 information hub to help put the past year into perspective
Where does this data come from?
Source: ILO
Details: The source defines workers as individuals aged 15-64. Full time jobs are defined using a 40 hour or 48 hour work week depending on the country. Additionally, the ILO used a multitude of national data sources on unemployment, furlough schemes, etc. to calculate working hour losses. Their methodology can be explored further here.

You may also like
-
Charted: Global Economic Policy Uncertainty (1997-2025)
-
Charted: The Decline of U.S. Software Developer Jobs
-
Mapped: The Highest Marginal Income Tax Rate in Each Country
-
Visualizing the Average American Work Week (2006-2025)
-
Charted: Startups the Key to U.S. Job Growth
-
Charted: The Decline of Remote Work by Industry
Popular
-
War4 weeks ago
Ranked: The 15 Largest Defense Budgets in the World
-
Economy3 weeks ago
Ranked: The World’s Top 20 Economies by GDP Growth (2015-2025)
-
Misc4 weeks ago
Visualizing Ultra-Processed Food Consumption by Country
-
Maps1 week ago
Mapped: Which U.S. States Import the Most From Canada and Mexico?
-
Travel3 weeks ago
Charted: The Most Powerful Passports in 2025
-
Demographics4 weeks ago
Charted: When the World’s Largest Countries Will Hit Peak Population
-
Jobs7 days ago
Ranked: 2025’s Best Countries to Live and Work
-
Economy3 days ago
Ranked: The World’s Fastest Growing Economies in 2025