Markets
Mapped: America’s $2 Trillion Economic Drop, by State and Sector
Mapped: America’s $2 Trillion Economic Drop
It only took a handful of months for the U.S. economy to reel from COVID-19’s effects.
As unemployment rates hit all-time highs and businesses scrambled to stay afloat, new data shows that current dollar GDP plummeted from nearly $21.6 trillion down to $19.5 trillion between Q1’2020 and Q2’2020 (seasonally adjusted at annual rates).
While all states experienced a decline, the effects were not distributed equally across the nation. This visualization takes a look at the latest data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, uncovering the biggest declines across states, and which industries were most affected by COVID-19 related closures and uncertainty.
Change in GDP by State and Industry
Between March-June 2020, stay-at-home orders resulted in disruptions to consumer activity, health, and the broader economy, causing U.S. GDP to fall by 31.4% from numbers posted in Q1.
The U.S. economy is the sum of its parts, with each state contributing to the total output—making the COVID-19 decline even more evident when state-by-state change in GDP is taken into consideration.
State | Real GDP Change | Biggest Industry Decline | Industry Change (p.p.) |
---|---|---|---|
Alabama | -29.6 | Durable Goods Manufacturing | -5.02 |
Alaska | -33.8 | Transport and Warehousing | -9.43 |
Arizona | -25.3 | Accommodation and Food Services | -4.2 |
Arkansas | -27.9 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -4.57 |
California | -31.5 | Accommodation and Food Services | -4.43 |
Colorado | -28.1 | Accommodation and Food Services | -3.85 |
Connecticut | -31.1 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -4.61 |
Delaware | -21.9 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -4.19 |
Florida | -30.1 | Accommodation and Food Services | -5.3 |
Georgia | -27.7 | Accommodation and Food Services | -3.43 |
Hawaii | -42.2 | Accommodation and Food Services | -18.85 |
Idaho | -32.4 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -4.49 |
Illinois | -29.7 | Accommodation and Food Services | -4.11 |
Indiana | -33.0 | Durable Goods Manufacturing | -6.74 |
Iowa | -28.2 | Durable Goods Manufacturing | -4.35 |
Kansas | -30.3 | Durable Goods Manufacturing | -4.42 |
Kentucky | -34.5 | Durable Goods Manufacturing | -5.41 |
Louisiana | -31.4 | Accommodation and Food Services | -4.72 |
Maine | -34.4 | Accommodation and Food Services | -7.09 |
Maryland | -27.7 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -4.18 |
Massachusetts | -31.6 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -4.73 |
Michigan | -37.6 | Durable Goods Manufacturing | -7.57 |
Minnesota | -31.3 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -4.55 |
Mississippi | -32.9 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -4.56 |
Missouri | -32.1 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -4.29 |
Montana | -30.8 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -5.67 |
Nebraska | -31.0 | Transport and Warehousing | -6.13 |
Nevada | -42.2 | Accommodation and Food Services | -15.62 |
New Hampshire | -36.9 | Accommodation and Food Services | -6.7 |
New Jersey | -35.6 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -5.33 |
New Mexico | -28.3 | Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction | -4.4 |
New York | -36.3 | Accommodation and Food Services | -5.97 |
North Carolina | -30.5 | Accommodation and Food Services | -4.67 |
North Dakota | -27.6 | Transport and Warehousing | -4.94 |
Ohio | -33.0 | Durable Goods Manufacturing | -4.92 |
Oklahoma | -31.1 | Transport and Warehousing | -6.22 |
Oregon | -31.9 | Accommodation and Food Services | -5.81 |
Pennsylvania | -34.0 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -5.07 |
Rhode Island | -32.4 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -5.73 |
South Carolina | -32.6 | Accommodation and Food Services | -6.16 |
South Dakota | -28.8 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -5.44 |
Tennessee | -40.4 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -6.25 |
Texas | -29.0 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -3.13 |
Utah | -22.4 | Transport and Warehousing | -3.12 |
Vermont | -38.2 | Accommodation and Food Services | -8.52 |
Virginia | -27.0 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -3.59 |
Washington | -25.5 | Accommodation and Food Services | -4.39 |
West Virginia | -29.6 | Health Care and Social Assistance | -5.48 |
Wisconsin | -32.6 | Durable Goods Manufacturing | -5.17 |
Wyoming | -32.5 | Transport and Warehousing | -7.38 |
🇺🇸 U.S. | -31.4 | Accommodation and Food Services | -4.38 |
Note: Industry changes are reported in percentage points (p.p.) of total current dollar GDP between Q1 and Q2.
A total of 18 states took the biggest hit within the Accommodation & Food Services sector, which was also the industry that suffered the most nationally, dropping by 4.38%.
Highly dependent on tourism, Hawaii bore the brunt of decline in this industry with a 18.85% drop. According to The Economic Research Organization at the University of Hawaii (UHERO), a second wave of infections and expired financial assistance were behind this contraction.
Next, the Health Care & Social Assistance sector was most impacted in 17 states between the two quarters, falling the most in Tennessee (-6.25%).
The most resilient industry amid the pandemic was Financial Services. In the state of Delaware, home to major banks such as JPMorgan Chase and Capital One, the sector actually grew by 4.47%. However, Delaware’s GDP ultimately still fell due to contractions in other sectors.
Each Industry’s Worst Performing State
Looking at it another way, the worst-performing state by industry also becomes clear when the change in percentage points (p.p.) Q1’–Q2’2020 GDP contributions are measured. Of the 21 industries profiled, Nevada shows up in the lower end of the spectrum four times.
Industry | Worst-performing state | Change (p.p.) |
---|---|---|
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting | Nebraska | -4.99% |
Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction | Wyoming | -5.76% |
Utilities | Nebraska | -0.33% |
Construction | New York | -2.02% |
Durable goods manufacturing | Michigan | -7.57% |
Nondurable goods manufacturing | Indiana | -2.65% |
Wholesale trade | New Jersey | -3.35% |
Retail trade | Nevada | -2.88% |
Transportation and warehousing | Alaska | -9.43% |
Information | California | -0.88% |
Finance and insurance | South Dakota | -1.53% |
Real estate and rental and leasing | Florida | -2.00% |
Professional, scientific, and technical services | District of Columbia | -4.46% |
Management of companies and enterprises | Nevada | -0.38% |
Administrative/ support /waste management / remediation | Nevada | -2.48% |
Educational services | Rhode Island | -1.47% |
Health care and social assistance | Tennessee | -6.25% |
Arts, entertainment, and recreation | Nevada | -4.44% |
Accommodation and food services | Hawaii | -18.85% |
Other services (ex. govt) | District of Columbia | -2.40% |
Government and government enterprises | Alaska | -4.19% |
With many U.S. business leaders expecting a second contraction to occur in the economy, will future figures reflect further declines, or will states manage to bounce back?
The Most Popular TV Brands in the U.S.
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Every year, over 40 million TVs are sold in the U.S., making the device a flagship technology in many American homes.
In this graphic, we illustrate the most popular TV brands in the U.S. based on a 2023 Statista survey of over 8,000 American adults. Respondents were asked, ‘What brand is your main TV?’
Korean Brands Dominate the U.S. TV Market
Samsung and LG combined account for 52% of the TV market share. Interestingly, the two firms have a partnership in place, with LG supplying OLED TV panels to Samsung since 2023.
TV Brand | Country | % of Respondents |
---|---|---|
Samsung | 🇰🇷 South Korea | 33 |
LG | 🇰🇷 South Korea | 19 |
Vizio | 🇺🇸 U.S. | 11 |
Sony | 🇯🇵 Japan | 7 |
Hisense | 🇨🇳 China | 5 |
TCL | 🇨🇳 China | 5 |
Philips | 🇳🇱 Netherlands | 3 |
Insignia | 🇺🇸 U.S. | 2 |
Sanyo | 🇯🇵 Japan | 2 |
Toshiba | 🇯🇵 Japan | 2 |
Sharp | 🇯🇵 Japan | 1 |
Other or don't know | -- | 9 |
Vizio, a California-based company, holds the third position, but its TVs aren’t manufactured in the United States. Rather, they are produced by Taiwanese companies AmTran Technology and Foxconn, the latter being a major manufacturer of the iPhone.
Further down the ranking is Insignia, owned by U.S. retailer Best Buy. While it’s uncertain who produces Insignia TVs, some speculate they’re made by China’s Hisense.
Despite holding the largest market share, South Korea ranks behind Japan in terms of the number of companies among the top brands. Japan boasts four brands on our list, with Sony ranked 4th overall, capturing 7% of the responses.
Growing Market
The U.S. is witnessing a surge in demand for high-definition televisions, driven by consumers’ desire for a more immersive home viewing experience.
Globally, the U.S. leads in revenue generation, with the American TV market projected to generate $18.2 billion in revenue in 2024.
-
Healthcare5 days ago
The Cost of an EpiPen in Major Markets
-
AI2 weeks ago
Charted: The Jobs Most Impacted by AI
-
Markets1 week ago
Visualizing the Biggest Companies on Major Stock Exchanges
-
Money1 week ago
The World’s Top 50 Largest Banks by Consolidated Assets
-
Demographics1 week ago
Visualizing the Declining Birth Rate in Japan
-
Technology1 week ago
The World’s Largest Corporate Holders of Bitcoin
-
Misc1 week ago
A Map of Global Happiness By Country in 2024
-
Markets1 week ago
The 12 Worst Investment Funds Over the Past Decade