Business
Infographic Timeline: 10 Years of Tinder
Infographic Timeline: Ten Years of Tinder
A decade of swiping and over half a billion downloads later, Tinder still leads the market share of online dating apps in the United States at 32%.
What started as a “hook-up” app 10 years ago for college students, is now a mainstream hit that is globally used in 190 countries and 45 languages.
The graphic above highlights key moments that have shaped the app’s success, using data from Match Group’s investor presentations and news reports.
From Hatch to Match: The Early Days of Tinder
The concept of the app emerged when the original founding partners, Sean Rad and Joe Munoz, won a hackathon in 2012. Their collaboration lead to the development of Tinder (originally named Matchbox).
Marketing the app to college students was a strategic decision that quickly gained the interest of millennials. This young demographic had been traditionally underserved in the online dating world, and with the global adoption of smartphones, a mobile-only dating app hit the right spot at the right time.
Monetization began in 2015 when premium features became exclusively available for paid users. Annual revenue that year was $47 million and by 2021 that grew to $1.7 billion.
Match Group acquired Tinder in 2017, with a $3 billion valuation. But at the time, very few could predict the stellar run Tinder would have, having risen to become the top dating app in the world and one of the most popular apps overall.
This surge in popularity is also reflected in the financials — Tinder is just one of the 30 dating apps that Match Group owns, but it represents over 50% of their overall revenues. In addition, Tinder is closing in on generating $2 billion per year.
Today, Match Group is worth roughly $17 billion, and by some estimates Tinder is worth around $9 billion, over triple the price of the original acquisition.
Note: Tinder’s value is based on the valuation multiples for online dating companies as well as Tinder’s revenues as a portion of Match Group’s total.
Tinder and Technology
The swipe feature was an integral part of Tinder’s design, and it revolutionized the dating world. Gamifying dating was a novel concept when the feature was introduced back in 2012.
From the 1998 film “You’ve Got Mail” to today’s dopamine-inducing hit of “It’s a Match!,” it’s easy to see the influence technology has on the way we date and mate.
Below is a snapshot of app features that have been driven by technology and culture:
Year | Technological Feature | Key Business Focus |
---|---|---|
2012 | The “Swipe” | Gamification is the hook |
2014 | Tinder Plus | App monetization driven by user experience |
2015 | Instagram Integration & Facebook “Common Connections” | Network effects |
2017 | Tinder Gold | Power to the user - “Insight to who has liked me” |
2019 | Traveler Alert | Putting user safety first |
2020 | Panic Button / “Are You Sure?” | Putting user safety first |
2021 | Plus One | The pursuit of connections post-covid |
2023? | Virtual Exploration - It’s a “Swipe Party” | Understanding the changing demographic |
The Tinder Algorithm
Rating people’s attractiveness can be a controversial subject. Websites like Hot or Not and Mark Zuckerberg’s Facemash are cringe-worthy reminders of the internet’s past.
During the app’s early development, the discovery of a new match relied partially on the “Elo” rating system to score desirability. Attractiveness was evaluated by how often people swiped. The more selective you were with swiping, the higher your attractiveness was rated within the algorithm.
But now according to Tinder’s pressroom:
“Elo is old news at Tinder.”
Instead, Tinder’s algorithmic criteria for profile discovery depends on the users:
- Recent activity – members who are sending likes and nopes
- Profile elements such as the user’s interests
- Location
Tinder now says that proximity is a key factor in how people match on the app.
The Future of Tinder: A Changing Demographic
Today, as the company attempts to target Gen Z, the company’s revenue growth expectations are more lukewarm thanks to shifting cultural preferences,
And keeping the app relevant to a young demographic requires thoughtful consideration that goes beyond just adding new technological features. According to research organization YouthSight, more than 90% of Gen Z’ers report having frustrations with dating apps.
Only time will tell if technological incentives such as features for the metaverse, or virtual coins that further gamify the dating app, are attractive enough for Tinder to compete against the allures of meeting people IRL.
Markets
Ranked: 15 of the World’s Least Affordable Housing Markets
This map examines middle-income housing market affordability across eight major countries, highlighting some of the least affordable cities.

Ranked: 15 of the World’s Least Affordable Housing Markets
When considering where to live, big cities are attractive to people for a number of reasons, but affordability is usually not one of them.
This map, using data from Demographia, highlights the major cities ranked the worst for housing market affordability on a global basis.
Unaffordable Housing Markets
Demographia’s report looks at middle-income housing affordability in 94 cities in eight countries, many of which are known for having pricy housing markets:
- 🇦🇺 Australia
- 🇨🇦 Canada
- 🇨🇳 China (Hong Kong)
- 🇮🇪 Ireland
- 🇳🇿 New Zealand
- 🇸🇬 Singapore
- 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
- 🇺🇸 United States
For the 2023 report, it uses 2022 Q3 prices and income levels for evaluation, dividing the median house price by the gross median household income to find the median multiple for housing.
And for the first time in the history of Demographia’s reporting, not a single of the 94 cities scored below 3.0, the cutoff to be deemed “affordable.” Here’s a closer look at the least affordable markets in 2023:
Rank | City | Housing Median Multiple |
---|---|---|
1 | 🇭🇰 Hong Kong | 18.8 |
2 | 🇦🇺 Sydney | 13.3 |
3 | 🇨🇦 Vancouver | 12.0 |
4 | 🇺🇸 Honolulu | 11.8 |
5 | 🇺🇸 San Jose | 11.5 |
6 | 🇺🇸 Los Angeles | 11.3 |
7 | 🇳🇿 Auckland | 10.8 |
8 | 🇺🇸 San Francisco | 10.7 |
9 | 🇦🇺 Melbourne | 9.9 |
10 | 🇨🇦 Toronto | 9.5 |
11 | 🇺🇸 San Diego | 9.4 |
12 | 🇬🇧 London | 8.7 |
13 | 🇺🇸 Miami | 8.5 |
14 | 🇦🇺 Adelaide | 8.2 |
15 | 🇬🇧 Bournemouth & Dorset | 8.0 |
For well over a decade now, Hong Kong has taken the top spot as the least affordable market globally. The only city to become even less affordable year over year was Los Angeles.
On the flip side, the most affordable city in the U.S. was Pittsburgh, with the median multiple sitting at 3.1. As people start to get priced out of certain markets, they may start to move to these more affordable cities.
Zooming out farther, here are the housing market affordability scores for all eight jurisdictions covered in this report:
Country / Jurisdiction | Housing Median Multiple |
---|---|
🇭🇰 Hong Kong | 18.8 |
🇳🇿 New Zealand | 10.8 |
🇦🇺 Australia | 8.2 |
🇨🇦 Canada | 5.3 |
🇸🇬 Singapore | 5.3 |
🇬🇧 UK | 5.3 |
🇮🇪 Ireland | 5.1 |
🇺🇸 U.S. | 5.0 |
Again, none of these countries are considered affordable, but within each there is a wide range of scores. Hong Kong is significantly less affordable than the second-place New Zealand and third-place Australia.
Scores across Canada, Singapore, the UK, Ireland and the U.S., however, are quite similar.
Better Cities for Housing Market Affordability
While many people flock to big cities, evidenced by the fact that many of the least affordable places are also among the most populous, others are opting to live somewhere more in their price range.
Here’s a glance at some of the most affordable housing markets worldwide:
Rank | City | Housing Median Multiple |
---|---|---|
1 | 🇺🇸 Pittsburgh, PA | 3.1 |
2 | 🇺🇸 Rochester, NY | 3.2 |
3 | 🇺🇸 Cleveland, OH | 3.5 |
3 | 🇺🇸 St. Louis, MO-IL | 3.5 |
5 | 🇺🇸 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN | 3.6 |
5 | 🇺🇸 Oklahoma City, OK | 3.6 |
7 | 🇺🇸 Buffalo, NY | 3.7 |
8 | 🇺🇸 Detroit, MI | 3.8 |
9 | 🇺🇸 Louisville, KY-IN | 3.9 |
9 | 🇺🇸 Tusla, OK | 3.9 |
11 | 🇨🇦 Edmonton, AB | 4.0 |
11 | 🇺🇸 Hartford, CT | 4.0 |
11 | 🇺🇸 Kansas City, MO-KS | 4.0 |
14 | 🇺🇸 Columbus, OH | 4.1 |
14 | 🇺🇸 Grand Rapid, MI | 4.1 |
14 | 🇺🇸 Indianapolis, IN | 4.1 |
14 | 🇺🇸 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI | 4.1 |
14 | 🇺🇸 Philadelphia, PA-NJ-DE-MD | 4.1 |
All of the top 18 most affordable cities covered in the report are located in North America.
While big, global cities will certainly continue to attract talent and residents from all over, the more affordable cities may gain new residents for more practical financial reasons.
-
United States6 days ago
Mapped: How Much Does it Take to be the Top 1% in Each U.S. State?
-
Money2 weeks ago
Visualized: How Long Does it Take to Double Your Money?
-
Markets6 days ago
Charted: What are Retail Investors Interested in Buying in 2023?
-
Misc4 weeks ago
Ranked: The World’s Largest Stadiums
-
Maps2 weeks ago
The Incredible Historical Map That Changed Cartography
-
Markets4 days ago
The $109 Trillion Global Stock Market in One Chart
-
Markets4 weeks ago
Charted: Six Red Flags Pointing to China’s Economy Slowing Down
-
VC+2 weeks ago
What’s New on VC+ in September