Misc
Visualizing The Smoking Population of Countries
Visualizing The Smoking Population of Countries
According to Our World in Data, about one-in-four adults around the world smoke tobacco—at least on an occasional basis. And in many countries, a majority of these smokers are men.
But just how big is the smoking gender gap, and which places have the biggest divide between men and women when it comes to smoking? This graphic by Pablo Alvarez visualizes the smoking population breakdown across the globe.
About the Dataset
The dataset is compiled by Our World in Data and uses the latest available figures (2020) that’ve been pulled from the World Bank. The data includes men and women aged 15 and over, and focuses on the world’s top 50 most populous countries.
It’s also worth highlighting that, for the purposes of this study, a smoker is defined as someone who smokes any form of tobacco (cigarettes, cigars, pipes, etc.) and includes people who smoke on a daily, non-daily, and occasional basis.
The Breakdown of Men versus Women Smokers
According to the figures in the dataset, countries in Asia and Africa seem to have the biggest gender gap when it comes to smoking.
For instance, 71% of Indonesian men smoke, while only 4% of Indonesian women use tobacco. And in China, nearly half of men are smokers, while only 2% of women smoke.
Country | % of women who smoke | % of men who smoke |
---|---|---|
🇮🇩 Indonesia | 4% | 71% |
🇲🇲 Myanmar | 20% | 68% |
🇧🇩 Bangladesh | 17% | 52% |
🇨🇳 China | 2% | 49% |
🇳🇷 Nauru | 49% | 47% |
🇳🇵Nepal | 13% | 48% |
🇪🇬 Egypt | 0% | 48% |
🇻🇳 Vietnam | 2% | 47% |
🇲🇾 Malaysia | 1% | 44% |
🇲🇬 Madagascar | 13% | 43% |
🇹🇷 Turkey | 19% | 42% |
🇹🇭 Thailand | 3% | 41% |
🇷🇺 Russia | 13% | 41% |
🇮🇳 India | 13% | 41% |
🇩🇿 Algeria | 1% | 41% |
🇺🇦 Ukraine | 12% | 40% |
🇵🇭 Philippines | 6% | 39% |
🇦🇫 Afghanistan | 7% | 39% |
🇰🇷 South Korea | 6% | 36% |
🇮🇶 Iraq | 2% | 35% |
🇫🇷 France | 32% | 35% |
🇿🇦 South Africa | 6% | 34% |
🇵🇰 Pakistan | 7% | 33% |
🇾🇪 Yemen | 8% | 32% |
🇯🇵 Japan | 10% | 30% |
🇪🇸 Spain | 27% | 29% |
🇦🇷Argentina | 20% | 29% |
🇺🇸 U.S. | 18% | 28% |
🇵🇱 Poland | 20% | 28% |
🇲🇦 Morocco | 1% | 28% |
🇮🇹 Italy | 20% | 27% |
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia | 2% | 26% |
🇮🇷 Iran | 3% | 24% |
🇩🇪 Germany | 20% | 24% |
🇲🇿 Mozambique | 6% | 23% |
🇨🇩 DR Congo | 3% | 23% |
🇲🇽 Mexico | 6% | 20% |
🇰🇪 Kenya | 3% | 20% |
🇨🇮 Cote d'Ivoire | 1% | 18% |
🇬🇧 UK | 14% | 17% |
🇧🇷 Brazil | 9% | 16% |
🇨🇦 Canada | 11% | 15% |
🇹🇿 Tanzania | 3% | 14% |
🇺🇬 Uganda | 4% | 13% |
🇵🇪 Peru | 3% | 13% |
🇨🇲 Cameroon | 1% | 13% |
🇮🇸 Iceland | 12% | 11% |
🇨🇴 Colombia | 5% | 12% |
🇪🇹 Ethiopia | 1% | 9% |
🇳🇬 Nigeria | 0% | 7% |
🇬🇭 Ghana | 0% | 7% |
In fact, nearly all the countries included in the study have more male smokers than women—However, there are a few outliers.
For example, in the small Micronesian island of Nauru, a slightly higher percentage of women smoke than men. And in Iceland, there’s a similar trend—12% of women smoke compared to 11% of men.
Despite these few anomalies, the general consensus is that men tend to smoke more than women. And according to Our World in Data, this male-bias can be seen in health statistics. For instance, research by the World Health Organization has found that men are more likely to die from lung cancer.
The Knock-on Effects of Smoking
As many people are now aware of, smoking can lead to major health problems. In fact, it’s estimated that about 15% of deaths around the world are linked to smoking—Either directly, or from second-hand smoke.
Over the last two decades, knowledge around the dangers of smoking has become more widespread, and changes to legislation has forced cigarette companies to put health warnings on their packaging.
And as discourse around smoking and its health-risks has started to circulate more rapidly, the number of smokers worldwide has started to decrease. Here’s a chart showing the drop in smokers in select countries, from 2000 to 2020:
Will the smoking population continue to drop in the next few decades, or have we reached a plateau?

This article was published as a part of Visual Capitalist's Creator Program, which features data-driven visuals from some of our favorite Creators around the world.
United States
Mapped: How Much Does it Take to be the Top 1% in Each U.S. State?
An annual income anywhere between $360,000-$950,000 can grant entry into the top 1%—depending on where you live in America.

How Much Does it Take to be the Top 1% in Each U.S. State?
There’s an old saying: everyone thinks that they’re middle-class.
But how many people think, or know, that they really belong to the top 1% in the country?
Data from personal finance advisory services company, SmartAsset, reveals the annual income threshold at which a household can be considered part of the top 1% in their state.
Some states demand a much higher yearly earnings from their residents to be a part of the rarefied league, but which ones are they, and how much does one need to earn to make it to the very top echelon of income?
Ranking U.S. States By Income to Be in the Top 1%
At the top of the list, a household in Connecticut needs to earn nearly $953,000 annually to be part of the one-percenters. This is the highest minimum threshold across the country.
In the same region, Massachusetts requires a minimum annual earnings of $903,401 from its top 1% residents.
Here’s the list of all 50 U.S. states along with the annual income needed to be in the 1%.
Rank | State | Top 1% Income Threshold | Top 1% Tax Rate (% of annual income) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Connecticut | $952,902 | 28.40% |
2 | Massachusetts | $903,401 | 27.15% |
3 | California | $844,266 | 26.95% |
4 | New Jersey | $817,346 | 28.01% |
5 | Washington | $804,853 | 25.99% |
6 | New York | $776,662 | 28.29% |
7 | Colorado | $709,092 | 25.86% |
8 | Florida | $694,987 | 25.82% |
9 | Illinois | $660,810 | 26.35% |
10 | New Hampshire | $659,037 | 26.25% |
11 | Wyoming | $656,118 | 24.79% |
12 | Virginia | $643,848 | 26.11% |
N/A | National Average | $652,657 | N/A |
13 | Maryland | $633,333 | 25.94% |
14 | Texas | $631,849 | 25.83% |
15 | Utah | $630,544 | 23.77% |
16 | Minnesota | $626,451 | 25.53% |
17 | Nevada | $603,751 | 25.19% |
18 | South Dakota | $590,373 | 22.99% |
19 | Pennsylvania | $588,702 | 24.95% |
20 | North Dakota | $585,556 | 24.76% |
21 | Georgia | $585,397 | 25.06% |
22 | Oregon | $571,813 | 24.66% |
23 | Arizona | $564,031 | 25.22% |
24 | Idaho | $560,040 | 23.17% |
25 | North Carolina | $559,762 | 25.31% |
26 | Montana | $559,656 | 24.46% |
27 | Kansas | $554,912 | 25.03% |
28 | Rhode Island | $548,531 | 25.26% |
29 | Tennessee | $548,329 | 25.12% |
30 | Alaska | $542,824 | 25.38% |
31 | Nebraska | $535,651 | 24.10% |
32 | Delaware | $529,928 | 25.37% |
33 | Vermont | $518,039 | 23.63% |
34 | Wisconsin | $517,321 | 24.90% |
35 | South Carolina | $508,427 | 24.40% |
36 | Michigan | $504,671 | 25.01% |
37 | Maine | $502,605 | 24.04% |
38 | Missouri | $500,626 | 24.93% |
39 | Ohio | $500,253 | 25.09% |
40 | Hawaii | $495,263 | 24.12% |
41 | Iowa | $483,985 | 24.09% |
42 | Indiana | $473,685 | 24.55% |
43 | Alabama | $470,341 | 23.82% |
44 | Oklahoma | $460,172 | 23.68% |
45 | Louisiana | $458,269 | 24.80% |
46 | Arkansas | $450,700 | 21.11% |
47 | Kentucky | $445,294 | 24.14% |
48 | New Mexico | $411,395 | 23.35% |
49 | Mississippi | $381,919 | 23.04% |
50 | West Virginia | $367,582 | 23.26% |
N/A | National Median Household Income | $75,000 | N/A |
California ($844,266), New Jersey ($817,346), and Washington ($804,853) round out the top five states with the highest minimum thresholds to make it to their exclusive rich club.
On the other end of the spectrum, the top one-percenters in West Virginia make a minimum of $367,582 a year, the lowest of all the states, and about one-third of the threshold in Connecticut. And just down southwest of the Mountain State, Mississippi’s one-percenters need to make at least $381,919 a year to qualify for the 1%.
A quick glance at the map above also reveals some regional insights.
The Northeast and West Coast, with their large urban and economic hubs, have higher income entry requirements for the top 1% than states in the American South.
This also correlates to the median income by state, a measure showing Massachusetts households make nearly $90,000 a year, compared to Mississippians who take home $49,000 annually.
How Much Do the Top 1% Pay in Taxes?
Meanwhile, if one does make it to the top 1% in states like Connecticut and Massachusetts, expect to pay more in taxes than other states, according to SmartAsset’s analysis.
The one-percenters in the top five states pay, on average, between 26–28% of their income in tax, compared to those in the bottom five who pay between 21–23%.
And this pattern exists through the dataset, with higher top 1% income thresholds correlating with higher average tax rates for the wealthy.
State Ranks | Median Tax Rate |
---|---|
Top 10 | 26.65% |
20-30 | 25.09% |
30-40 | 24.65% |
10-20 | 25.07% |
40-50 | 23.75% |
These higher tax rates point to attempts to reign in the increasing wealth disparity in the nation where the top 1% hold more than one-third of the country’s wealth, up from 27% in 1989.
Where Does This Data Come From?
Source: SmartAsset’s America’s Top 1% Is Different in Each State uses data from 2020 individual tax filings from the IRS, adjusted to 2023 dollars using the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index.
-
United States1 day ago
Mapped: How Much Does it Take to be the Top 1% in Each U.S. State?
-
Markets4 weeks ago
The Monthly Cost of Buying vs. Renting a House in America
-
Money2 weeks ago
Visualized: How Long Does it Take to Double Your Money?
-
AI19 hours ago
Charted: What are Retail Investors Interested in Buying in 2023?
-
Misc4 weeks ago
Ranked: The World’s Largest Stadiums
-
History2 weeks ago
The Incredible Historical Map That Changed Cartography
-
Markets3 weeks ago
Charted: Six Red Flags Pointing to China’s Economy Slowing Down
-
VC+2 weeks ago
What’s New on VC+ in September