Space
Visualizing All Attempted and Successful Moon Landings
Visualizing All Attempted and Successful Moon Landings
Since before Ancient Greece and the first Chinese Dynasties, people have sought to understand and learn more about the moon.
Curiosity and centuries of study culminated in the first moon landing in the 1960s. But there have been many other attempted moon landings, both before and after.
This chart by Preyash Shah illustrates all the moon landings using NASA data since 1966 when Soviet lander Luna 9 touched down.
Race to the Moon
The 1960s and 1970s marked an era of intense competition between the U.S. and the Soviet Union as they raced to conquer the moon.
During the Cold War, space became a priority as each side sought to prove the superiority of its technology, its military firepower, and its political-economic system.
In 1961, President John F. Kennedy set a national goal to have a crewed lunar landing and return to Earth.
After several failed attempts from both sides, on July 20, 1969, the Apollo 11 mission was successful and astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin became the first humans to set foot on the moon.
Mission | Launch Date | Operator | Country | Mission Type | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 3 | 26-Jan-62 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Ranger 4 | 23-Apr-62 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Ranger 5 | 18-Oct-62 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna E-6 No.2 | 4-Jan-63 | OKB-1 | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna E-6 No.3 | 3-Feb-63 | OKB-1 | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna 4 | 2-Apr-63 | OKB-1 | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna E-6 No.6 | 21-Mar-64 | OKB-1 | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna E-6 No.5 | 20-Apr-64 | OKB-1 | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Kosmos 60 | 12-Mar-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna E-6 No.8 | 10-Apr-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 5 | 9-May-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 6 | 8-Jun-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 7 | 4-Oct-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 8 | 3-Dec-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 9 | 31-Jan-66 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 1 | 30-May-66 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 2 | 20-Sep-66 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 13 | 21-Dec-66 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 3 | 17-Apr-67 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 4 | 14-Jul-67 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Surveyor 5 | 8-Sep-67 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 6 | 7-Nov-67 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 7 | 7-Jan-68 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander | Successful |
Luna E-8 No.201 | 19-Feb-69 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna E-8-5 No.402 | 14-Jun-69 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna 15 | 13-Jul-69 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Apollo 11 | 16-Jul-69 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle | Successful |
Kosmos 300 | 23-Sep-69 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Kosmos 305 | 22-Oct-69 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Apollo 12 | 14-Nov-69 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle | Successful |
Luna E-8-5 No.405 | 6-Feb-70 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Apollo 13 | 11-Apr-70 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle | Partial failure |
Luna 16 | 12-Sep-70 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Luna 17 | 10-Nov-70 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Apollo 14 | 31-Jan-71 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle | Successful |
Apollo 15 | 26-Jul-71 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle | Successful |
Luna 18 | 2-Sep-71 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 20 | 14-Feb-72 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Apollo 16 | 16-Apr-72 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle | Successful |
Apollo 17 | 7-Dec-72 | NASA | 🇺🇸 U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle | Successful |
Luna 21 | 8-Jan-73 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Luna 23 | 16-Oct-75 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Partial failure |
Luna E-8-5M No.412 | 16-Oct-75 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna 24 | 9-Aug-76 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Chang'e 3 | 1-Dec-13 | CNSA | 🇨🇳 China | Lander | Operational |
Chang'e 4 | 7-Dec-18 | CNSA | 🇨🇳 China | Lander | Operational |
Beresheet | 22-Feb-19 | SpaceIL | 🇮🇱 Israel | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Chandrayaan-2 | 22-Jul-19 | ISRO | 🇮🇳 India | Lander | Spacecraft Failure |
Chang'e 5 | 23-Nov-20 | CNSA | 🇨🇳 China | Lander | Successful |
Hakuto-R Mission 1 | 11-Dec-22 | ispace | 🇯🇵 Japan | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Chandrayaan-3 | 14-Jul-23 | ISRO | 🇮🇳 India | Lander | Successful |
Luna 25 | 10-Aug-23 | Roscosmos | 🇷🇺 Russia | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
After the Apollo missions, the fervor of lunar exploration waned. From 1976 to 2013, no moon landing attempts occurred due to budget constraints, shifting priorities, and advances in robotic missions.
However, a new chapter in space exploration has unfolded in recent years, with emerging players entering the cosmic arena. With its Chang’e missions, China has made significant strides, landing rovers on the moon and exploring the far side of the moon.
India, too, has asserted its presence with the Chandrayaan missions. In 2023, the country became the 4th nation to reach the moon as an unmanned spacecraft landed near the lunar south pole, advancing the country’s space ambitions to learn more about the lunar ice, potentially one of the moon’s most valuable resources.
Exploring Lunar Water
Since the 1960s, even before the historic Apollo landing, scientists had theorized the potential existence of water on the moon.
In 2008, Brown University researchers employed advanced technology to reexamine lunar samples, discovering hydrogen within beads of volcanic glass. And in 2009, a NASA instrument aboard the India’s Chandrayaan-1 probe confirmed the presence of water on the moon’s surface.
Water is deemed crucial for future space exploration. Beyond serving as a potential source of drinking water for future moon explorations, ice deposits could play a pivotal role in cooling equipment. Lunar ice could also be broken down to produce hydrogen for fuel and oxygen for breathing, essential for supporting extended space missions.
With a reinvigorated interest in exploring the moon, manned moon landings are on the horizon once again. In April 2023, NASA conducted tests for the launch of Artemis I, the first American spacecraft to aim for the moon since 1972. The agency aims to send astronauts to the moon around 2025 and build a base camp on the lunar surface.

This article was published as a part of Visual Capitalist's Creator Program, which features data-driven visuals from some of our favorite Creators around the world.
Environment
Ranked: The 28 Biggest Global Risks, According to the UN
Climate change inaction was the most important risk overall, ranking as the most pressing issue in three of the seven regions.

Most Pressing Global Risks 2024
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
As the world confronts overlapping crises, from accelerating climate change to the unchecked spread of misinformation, global risks are increasingly interconnected, compounding one another in ways that could overwhelm current institutions and systems.
This visualization shows the top 28 most important global risk as outlined in the United Nations Global Risk Report 2024.
Risk importance combines the likelihood and severity of a risk, with top risks seen as most likely to occur with severe impacts if or when they manifest.
Rankings are based on a survey of 1,100 stakeholders across 136 countries which includes representatives of government, industry, civil society, and academia.
What is the Most Important Risk the World is Facing?
Below, we show the top 28 most important global risks and their importance scores, according to the United Nations.
Rank | Risk | Importance Score | Category |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Climate Change Inaction | 37.2 | Environmental |
2 | Large-Scale Pollution | 36.0 | Environmental |
3 | Mis- and Disinformation | 35.4 | Political |
4 | Natural Hazard Risks | 35.0 | Environmental |
5 | Rise in Inequalities | 34.7 | Societal |
6 | Biodiversity Decline | 34.6 | Environmental |
7 | Geopolitical Tensions | 34.5 | Political |
8 | Natural Resource Shortages | 34.3 | Environmental |
9 | Mass Movement of People | 33.2 | Societal |
10 | Large-Scale War | 32.6 | Political |
11 | Biorisks | 32.3 | Societal |
12 | New Pandemic | 32.1 | Societal |
13 | Rule of Law Collapse | 32.0 | Political |
14 | Cybersecurity Breakdown | 31.7 | Technological |
15 | Global Financial Crisis | 31.6 | Economic |
16 | Weapons of Mass Destruction | 31.1 | Political |
17 | AI and Frontier Tech | 31.0 | Technological |
18 | Proliferation of Non-State Actors | 30.8 | Societal |
19 | Tech-Driven Power Concentration | 30.8 | Technological |
20 | Social Cohesion Collapse | 30.4 | Societal |
21 | Widespread Debt Crisis | 30.2 | Economic |
22 | Economic Fragmentation | 29.1 | Economic |
23 | State Sovereignty Erosion | 28.5 | Political |
24 | Global Economic Stagnation | 27.9 | Economic |
25 | Supply Chain Collapse | 27.8 | Economic |
26 | Geoengineering Disasters | 27.5 | Technological |
27 | Multilateral Institution Collapse | 26.3 | Political |
28 | Space-Based Event | 23.4 | Environmental |
Across all regions, environmental risks emerged as the highest priority, with climate change inaction and large-scale pollution both seen as highly likely and highly severe.
Climate change inaction was the most important risk overall, ranking as the most pressing issue in three of the seven regions.
In total, 84% of respondents said mis- and disinformation is already occurring, making it the most immediate risk today, according to the UN.
Mis- and disinformation also ranked as the top risk in the next two years, according to the World Economic Forum’s Global Risk Report.
While environmental concerns were top of mind for all regions, other perceptions varied by region. For example, in North Africa and Asia, concerns about cybersecurity breakdowns and artificial intelligence (AI) were among the top 10 risks, unlike in other regions.
Cybersecurity breakdowns were among the least prepared-for risks, with a preparedness score of just 3.9 out of 7. The only risk the world is less prepared for is a potential space-based event.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
To learn more about risks the world is facing in the near and long term, check out this graphic that visualizes the top global risks, as ranked by the World Economic Forum.
-
Energy3 weeks ago
Visualizing the Countries With the Largest Proven Oil Reserves
-
Misc2 weeks ago
Ranked: The Best Countries for Work-Life Balance in 2025
-
Maps4 weeks ago
Mapped: The Most Common Job in Each U.S. State in 2024
-
Money2 weeks ago
Mapped: The Income a Family Needs to Be Middle Class, by State
-
Oil and Gas1 week ago
Ranked: The World’s Top Countries by Natural Gas Reserves
-
Misc3 weeks ago
Mapped: The Most Stolen Car in Every U.S. State
-
Maps2 weeks ago
Ranked: 40 Best Countries in the World, According to People
-
Economy4 weeks ago
Ranked: U.S. States Most Dependent on the Federal Government