Misc
Visualized: The Daily Routines of Famous Creatives
View a higher resolution version of graphic.
Visualized: The Daily Routines of Famous Creatives
What is the best daily routine to unlock creativity, or is there such a thing?
Many modern suggestions for optimizing creativity—like scheduling time for “deep work,” and building small, sustainable “atomic habits”—can be traced back to famous creatives in many different eras. And though they all found success, they employed different methods as well.
In this unique visualization, RJ Andrews from InfoWeTrust has charted how notable creatives in different fields spent their days. He picked 16 of the 161 “inspired minds” covered by Daily Rituals: How Artists Work, a book by writer and editor Mason Currey published in 2013.
How Much “Creativity Time” in Famous Daily Routines?
Dividing the day into 24 hours, Andrews denoted certain categories for daily activities like working creatively, sleeping, and other miscellaneous endeavors (meals, leisure, exercise, and social time).
For the creatives with a separate day job—Immanuel Kant and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart—their ordinary labor is also counted in miscellaneous activities.
Below is a breakdown of the daily routine of all 16 people featured above:
Name | Occupation | Creative (hrs) | Sleep (hrs) | Miscellaneous (hrs) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maya Angelou | Writer/Poet | 9 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
W.H. Auden | Poet | 11.5 | 7 | 5.5 |
Honoré de Balzac | Novelist | 13.5 | 8.5 | 2 |
L.V. Beethoven | Composer / Pianist | 8 | 8 | 8 |
Le Corbusier | Architect | 8.5 | 7 | 8.5 |
Charles Darwin | Naturalist / Biologist/ Geologist | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Charles Dickens | Writer | 5 | 7 | 12 |
Gustave Flaubert | Novelist | 10.5 | 7 | 6.5 |
Sigmund Freud | Psychologist | 12.5 | 6 | 5.5 |
Benjamin Franklin | Writer / Inventor / Scientist / Statesman | 8 | 7 | 9 |
Victor Hugo | Writer | 2 | 8 | 14 |
Immanuel Kant | Philosopher | 7 | 7 | 10 |
Thomas Mann | Novelist | 8 | 8 | 8 |
John Milton | Poet | 8 | 7 | 9 |
W.A. Mozart | Composer / Pianist | 8 | 5 | 11 |
P.I. Tchaikovsky | Composer | 4.5 | 8 | 11.5 |
The average and median amount of time spent on creative work for these individuals was just over 8 hours a day. At the extremes were two French novelists, Honoré de Balzac with 13.5 hours daily spent on creative work, and Victor Hugo with only 2 hours.
Interestingly, the allocation of creative work time was different in almost every daily routine. Maya Angelou’s routine resembles the modern work day, with the bulk of her writing between 7 a.m. to 2 p.m. Others like Kant and Mozart had creativity blocks when time allowed, such as before and after their teaching jobs.
Then there are outliers like Honoré de Balzac and Sigmund Freud, who worked as much as they could. Balzac wrote from 1:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. with just an hour and a half nap break in between, fueled by up to 50 cups of coffee. Freud split up his creative work into three different blocks: analyzing patients in the morning, consulting in the afternoon, and reading and writing journals into the late evening.
But somewhere in their days, most of these brilliant minds made sure to get a good rest, with an average of 7.25 hours of sleep across the board.
Schedule Yourself to Create Success
Creativity may ebb and flow, but these great minds had one clear thing in common: scheduling time for creative work.
The perfect daily routine was usually what fit in with their lifestyle (and their bodies), not based on an arbitrary amount of work. For example, night owls with later chronotypes worked late, while socialites and politicians found time outside of their commitments.
They also found time to move and enjoy life. Half of the people in the dataset specified exercise in their accounts—either leisurely strolls or fast walks. Many also scheduled social time with partners, friends, or children, often paired with a meal.
Perhaps the greatest insight, however, is that the day-to-day routine doesn’t have to look extraordinary to be able to create extraordinary work.

This article was published as a part of Visual Capitalist's Creator Program, which features data-driven visuals from some of our favorite Creators around the world.
Environment
Mapped: America’s Sinking Cities
25 of the 28 largest U.S. metropolitan areas are sinking each year, with cities in Texas experiencing some of the most severe land subsidence.

Land Subsidence Across U.S. Cities
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Across the U.S., major urban centers are experiencing significant land subsidence, a.k.a the sinking of land.
This map visualizes the average vertical land movement within 28 of the largest U.S. cities from 2015 to 2021, measured in milimeters per year.
Data comes from a 2025 Nature Cities study titled “Land subsidence risk to infrastructure in US metropolises” by Ohenhen, Zhai, Lucy, et al.
Which U.S. City is Sinking the Most?
Below, we show the average vertical land movement within 28 of the largest U.S. cities from 2015 to 2021, measured in millimeters per year.
City | State | Vertical land movement (mm/year) |
---|---|---|
Houston | Texas | -5.216 |
Fort Worth | Texas | -4.366 |
Dallas | Texas | -3.846 |
New York | New York | -2.430 |
Chicago | Illinois | -2.323 |
Columbus | Ohio | -1.934 |
Seattle | Washington | -1.847 |
Detroit | Michigan | -1.726 |
Denver | Colorado | -1.714 |
Charlotte | North Carolina | -1.507 |
Indianapolis | Indiana | -1.423 |
Washington | District of Columbia | -1.283 |
Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | -1.283 |
Nashville | Tennessee | -1.133 |
San Antonio | Texas | -1.099 |
San Diego | California | -1.076 |
Portland | Oregon | -0.922 |
San Francisco | California | -0.857 |
Phoenix | Arizona | -0.846 |
Las Vegas | Nevada | -0.841 |
Austin | Texas | -0.792 |
El Paso | Texas | -0.754 |
Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | -0.735 |
Los Angeles | California | -0.729 |
Boston | Massachusetts | -0.478 |
Memphis | Tennessee | 0.006 |
San Jose | California | 0.219 |
Jacksonville | Florida | 0.452 |
A recent study found that 25 of the 28 largest U.S. metropolitan areas are sinking each year, with cities in Texas experiencing some of the most severe land subsidence.
Out of the cities studied, Houston was the city experiencing the most drastic subsidence, sinking 5.216 milimeters per year on average.
This gradual sinking can worsen the impacts of sea-level rise, increase flood risk, and place additional stress on urban infrastructure, particularly in densely developed areas.
The primary cause of this subsidence is groundwater extraction, though other contributing factors include the weight of urban development, oil and gas extraction, and glacial isostatic adjustment—a slow shift in the Earth’s surface due to the long-term melting of ancient ice sheets.
The study authors estimate that a total land area of 17,900 sq. km. is sinking across these 28 cities.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
To learn about sinking cities, check out this graphic by Planet Anomaly that visualizes the fastest-sinking coastal cities.
-
Misc3 weeks ago
Charted: The World’s Most Educated Countries
-
Business3 weeks ago
Ranked: The 50 Best Places to Work in America
-
Countries2 weeks ago
Ranked: Top 25 Countries With the Highest Life Expectancy
-
Money1 week ago
Ranked: The 20 Worst College Degrees for Finding a Job
-
Real Estate2 weeks ago
Mapped: U.S. Housing Affordability by State
-
Green3 weeks ago
Ranked: World Carbon Emissions by Country
-
Energy1 week ago
Ranked: Top Countries by Annual Electricity Production (1985–2024)
-
United States3 weeks ago
Mapped: Most Affordable U.S. Cities to Buy a Home in 2025