Money
The Big Mac Index: A Measure of Purchasing Power Parity & Burger Inflation
The Big Mac Index: A Measure of PPP and Burger Inflation
The Big Mac was created in 1967 by Jim Delligati, a McDonald’s franchise owner in Pennsylvania. It was launched throughout the U.S. the following year, and today you can buy one in more than 70 countries. However, the price you pay will vary based on where you are, as evidenced by the Big Mac Index.
Spanning from 2004-2022, this animation from James Eagle shows the U.S. dollar price of a Big Mac in select countries around the world.
What Does the Big Mac Index Show?
The Big Mac Index was invented by The Economist in 1986. It is intended to be a lighthearted way to demonstrate the concept of purchasing power parity. In other words, it helps illustrate the idea that market exchange rates between countries may be “out of whack” when compared to the cost of buying the same basket of goods and services in those places.
Given that McDonald’s is one of the biggest companies in the world and the Big Mac is widely available globally, it means that the famous burger can be used as a basic goods comparison between most countries. It also has the advantage of having the same inputs and distribution system, with a few minor modifications (like chicken patties in India instead of beef).
Using the price of a Big Mac in two countries, the index can give an indication as to whether a currency may be over or undervalued. For example, a Big Mac costs ¥24.40 in China and $5.81 in the United States. By comparing the implied exchange rate to the actual exchange rate, we can see whether the Yuan is over or undervalued.
According to the Big Mac Index, the Yuan is undervalued by 34%.
Beyond currency misalignment, the index has other uses. For instance, it shows inflation in burger prices over time. If we compare the price of a Big Mac across countries in the same currency—such as the U.S. dollar—we are also able to see where burgers are cheaper or relatively more expensive.
Burger Costs Around the World
In the animation, all Big Mac prices have been converted from local currency to U.S. dollars based on the actual exchange rate in effect at the time. Below, we show the change in price of a Big Mac in select countries, ordered by January 2022 prices.
Country | May 2004 | January 2022 | % change |
---|---|---|---|
Switzerland | $4.88 | $6.98 | 43% |
Norway | $5.18 | $6.39 | 23% |
United States | $2.90 | $5.81 | 100% |
Sweden | $3.94 | $5.79 | 47% |
Israel | $2.79 | $5.35 | 92% |
Canada | $2.33 | $5.32 | 129% |
Venezuela | $1.48 | $5.06 | 243% |
Euro area | $3.29 | $4.95 | 51% |
Denmark | $4.46 | $4.82 | 8% |
Britain | $3.37 | $4.82 | 43% |
New Zealand | $2.65 | $4.60 | 73% |
Australia | $2.27 | $4.51 | 98% |
Singapore | $1.93 | $4.36 | 126% |
Brazil | $1.70 | $4.31 | 154% |
Argentina | $1.48 | $4.29 | 190% |
Sri Lanka | $1.41 | $4.15 | 193% |
Czech Republic | $2.13 | $4.11 | 93% |
Chile | $2.18 | $3.88 | 78% |
Thailand | $1.45 | $3.84 | 166% |
China | $1.26 | $3.83 | 205% |
South Korea | $2.72 | $3.82 | 40% |
Poland | $1.63 | $3.44 | 111% |
Japan | $2.32 | $3.38 | 46% |
Peru | $2.58 | $3.36 | 31% |
Mexico | $2.07 | $3.34 | 62% |
Hungary | $2.51 | $3.09 | 23% |
Hong Kong | $1.54 | $2.82 | 83% |
Philippines | $1.23 | $2.79 | 126% |
Taiwan | $2.25 | $2.70 | 20% |
South Africa | $1.86 | $2.58 | 39% |
Ukraine | $1.36 | $2.43 | 79% |
Malaysia | $1.33 | $2.39 | 80% |
Indonesia | $1.77 | $2.36 | 34% |
Turkey | $2.58 | $1.86 | -28% |
Russia | $1.45 | $1.74 | 20% |
Switzerland takes the cake for the priciest Big Mac, followed closely behind by Norway. Both countries have relatively high price levels but also enjoy higher wages when compared to other OECD countries.
Venezuela has seen the largest jump in burger prices, with the cost of a Big Mac climbing nearly 250% since 2004. The country has been plagued by hyperinflation for years, so it’s no surprise to see large price swings in the country’s data.
While it appears that the price of a Big Mac has decreased in Turkey, this is because the prices are shown in U.S. dollars. The new Turkish lira has depreciated against the U.S. dollar more than 90% since it was introduced in 2005.
Finally, it’s worth noting that Russia has the cheapest Big Mac, reflecting the country’s lower price levels. Labor costs in Russia are roughly a third of those in Switzerland.
The Limitations of Burgernomics
The Big Mac Index is useful for a number of reasons. Investors can use it to measure inflation over time, and compare this to official records. This can help them value bonds and other securities that are sensitive to inflation. The Big Mac Index also indicates whether a currency may be over or undervalued, and investors can place foreign exchange trades accordingly.
Of course, the index does have shortcomings. Here are some that economists have noted.
- Non-traded services can have different prices across countries. The price of a Big Mac will be influenced by the costs of things like labor, but this is not a reflection of relative currency values. The Economist now releases a GDP-adjusted version of the Big Mac Index to help address this criticism.
- McDonald’s is not in every country in the world. This means the geographic reach of the Big Mac Index has some limitations, particularly in Africa.
- The index lacks diversity. The index is made up of one item: the Big Mac. Because of this, it lacks the diversity of other economic metrics such as the Consumer Price Index.
Despite all of these limitations, the Big Mac Index does act as a good starting place for understanding purchasing power parity. Through the simplicity of burgers, complex economic theory is easier to digest.

This article was published as a part of Visual Capitalist's Creator Program, which features data-driven visuals from some of our favorite Creators around the world.
Money
Mapped: The Income a Family Needs to Be Middle Class, by State
This map breaks down the median household income for each U.S. state.

The Income a Family Needs to Be Middle Class, by U.S. State
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Key Takeaways
- Maryland, Washington D.C., and Massachusetts have the highest median household income, all above $90,000 annually.
- Mississippi has the lowest median income, below $49,000 a year.
Across the United States, what qualifies as “middle class” varies widely depending on where you live. This map breaks down the median household income for each U.S. state, revealing sharp contrasts in earning power. It provides a snapshot of where families may feel more or less financially secure based on local income benchmarks.
The data for this visualization comes from SmartAsset.
Editor’s note: This map uses median household income as a simple indicator of the middle class in each state. True middle class status typically spans a range of incomes.
Top Earners Cluster in the Northeast
Maryland, Washington D.C., and Massachusetts lead the nation with household incomes at or above $90,000. High concentrations of federal jobs, tech firms, and elite educational institutions contribute to these numbers. According to Pew Research Center, these regions also report strong access to health care and education, reinforcing higher cost-of-living dynamics.
Rank | State | Median Household Income |
---|---|---|
1 | District Of Columbia | 90K |
2 | Maryland | 90K |
3 | Massachusetts | 90K |
4 | New Jersey | 89K |
5 | New Hampshire | 88K |
6 | California | 85K |
7 | Hawaii | 85K |
8 | Connecticut | 84K |
9 | Washington | 84K |
10 | Colorado | 82K |
11 | Virginia | 81K |
12 | Utah | 79K |
13 | Alaska | 78K |
14 | Minnesota | 78K |
15 | New York | 74K |
16 | Rhode Island | 74K |
17 | Illinois | 72K |
18 | Oregon | 72K |
19 | Vermont | 72K |
20 | Delaware | 71K |
21 | Arizona | 69K |
22 | Pennsylvania | 69K |
23 | Georgia | 67K |
24 | Nebraska | 67K |
25 | North Dakota | 67K |
26 | Texas | 67K |
27 | Wisconsin | 67K |
28 | Idaho | 66K |
29 | Iowa | 66K |
30 | Nevada | 66K |
31 | South Dakota | 66K |
32 | Maine | 65K |
33 | Wyoming | 65K |
34 | Kansas | 64K |
35 | Florida | 63K |
36 | Indiana | 63K |
37 | Michigan | 63K |
38 | Montana | 63K |
39 | Missouri | 62K |
40 | North Carolina | 62K |
41 | Ohio | 62K |
42 | Tennessee | 60K |
43 | South Carolina | 59K |
44 | Kentucky | 56K |
45 | Oklahoma | 56K |
46 | Alabama | 54K |
47 | New Mexico | 54K |
48 | Arkansas | 53K |
49 | Louisiana | 52K |
50 | West Virginia | 51K |
51 | Mississippi | 49K |
The South Continues to Lag Behind
Southern states like Mississippi, and Alabama have the lowest median household incomes, under $54,000. Economic mobility in these regions is often hindered by lower investment in public infrastructure and education. As Brookings notes, many Southern states also experience higher poverty rates and limited access to high-paying industries.
States with Growing Incomes
Several states in the West and Midwest—including Oregon, and Utah—are emerging with stronger income levels, typically in the $70,000-$80,000 range.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out U.S. Workers Earning Under $17/Hour by State on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.
-
Energy2 weeks ago
Visualizing the Countries With the Largest Proven Oil Reserves
-
Maps2 weeks ago
Mapped: The Most Common Job in Each U.S. State in 2024
-
Economy4 weeks ago
Ranked: The Best College Degrees for Finding a Job in the U.S.
-
Politics3 weeks ago
Ranked: Countries With the Largest Declines in Freedom (2014-2024)
-
Misc2 weeks ago
Mapped: The Most Stolen Car in Every U.S. State
-
Economy2 weeks ago
Ranked: U.S. States Most Dependent on the Federal Government
-
Misc3 weeks ago
How Tariffs Will Impact U.S. Car Prices, by Brand
-
Demographics2 weeks ago
Ranked: Countries With the Highest Share of Seniors