Inequality
Charting The Growing Generational Wealth Gap
The Growing Generational Wealth Gap
As young generations usher into adulthood, they inevitably begin to accumulate and inherit wealth, a trend that has broadly remained consistent.
But what has changed recently is the rate of accumulation.
In the U.S., household wealth has traditionally seen a relatively even distribution across different age groups. However, over the last 30 years, the U.S. Federal Reserve shows that older generations have been amassing wealth at a far greater rate than their younger cohorts.
As the visual above shows, the older have been getting richer, and the younger have been starting further back than ever before.
By Generation: Baby Boomers Benefit & Millennials Lag
To examine the proportion of wealth each generation holds, it’s important to clearly define each age group. Though personal definitions might differ, the U.S. Federal Reserve uses a clear metric:
Generation | Birth Years | Age (2020) |
---|---|---|
Silent Generation & Earlier | 1945 and earlier | 75+ |
Baby Boomers | 1946–1964 | 56–74 |
Generation X | 1965–1980 | 40–55 |
Millennials | 1981–1996 | 24–39 |
Relative to younger generations growing up, the Silent Generation and Greatest Generation before them have seen a decreasing share of household wealth over the last 30 years.
However, the numerical levels have been relatively stable. For these combined generations, total wealth has gone from $16 trillion in 1989 to $19 trillion in 2019, with a peak of $27 trillion in 2007. Considering this cohort has understandably shrunk over time—from an estimated 47 million to 23 million in 2019—their individual shares of wealth have actually increased.
Immediately following are the Baby Boomers, who held more than half of U.S. household wealth towards the end of 2020. At $59 trillion, the generation holds more than ten times the amount held by a comparative number of Millennials.
Generation | Wealth (2019) | Population (2019) | Wealth/Person |
---|---|---|---|
Silent Generation & Older | $18.8 Trillion | 23.0 Million | $817,391 |
Baby Boomers | $59.4 Trillion | 71.2 Million | $834,270 |
Generation X | $28.6 Trillion | 65.0 Million | $440,000 |
Millennials | $5.0 Trillion | 72.6 Million | $68,871 |
With $29 trillion held in 2019, Generation X has also been gaining in wealth over the last 30 years. It’s good enough for five times the wealth of Millennials, though at just $440k/person, they’ve fallen far behind Baby Boomers in rate of growth.
Finally, trying to catch up to their older cohorts are Millennials, who held the least amount of household wealth ($5 trillion) for the greatest population (73 million) in 2019, an average of just under $69k/person.
For a direct comparison, it took Generation X nine years to climb from their start of 0.4% of household wealth in 1989 to above 5%, while Millennials still haven’t crossed that threshold. But it’s not all doom and gloom for Millennials. Their rate of growth is starting to rise, with the generation’s level of wealth climbing from $3 trillion in 2016 to $5 trillion in 2019.
By Age: A Growing Share for 55+
Though the generational picture is stark, the difference in U.S. household wealth by age makes the picture of shifting wealth even clearer.
Until 2001, the shares of household wealth held by different age groups were relatively stable. People aged 40-54 and 55-69 held around 35% each of household wealth, retirees aged 70+ hovered around 20%, and younger people aged under 40 held around 10%.
Since that time, however, the shift in wealth to older generations is clear. The 70+ age group has seen their share of wealth increase to 26%, while the share held by ages 55-69 has grown from 35% to almost half.
But not all ages are seeing an increasing slice of wealth. The 40-54 age group saw its share drop sharply from 36% to 22% between 2001 and 2016 before starting to recover towards the end of the decade, while the youngest cohort now hover around just 5%.
Breaking down that wealth by components is even more eye-opening. The 39 and under age group holds 37.9% of their assets in real estate, the largest share amongst any age group (and concentrated in the hands of fewer people) while older age groups have their wealth spread out across real estate, equities, and pensions.
Assets Held by Age (Percent of Total, 2020) | 70+ | 55–69 | 40–54 | ≤39 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Real estate | 21.6% | 20.5% | 27.6% | 37.9% |
Consumer durables | 3.8% | 3.6% | 5.2% | 9.4% |
Corporate equities and mutual fund shares | 24.6% | 23.1% | 18.6% | 8.1% |
Pension entitlements | 16.3% | 25.0% | 21.9% | 21.0% |
Private businesses | 7.9% | 9.7% | 12.1% | 8.1% |
Other assets | 25.8% | 18.1% | 14.7% | 15.5% |
But the difference is as much in assets as it is in opportunity. In 1989, Baby Boomers and Generation X under 40 accounted for 13% of household wealth, compared to just 5.9% for Millennials and Generation Z under 40 in 2020.
Will the Tide Turn for Generation Z?
As new and accumulated wealth has been built up in older generations, it’s a matter of time before the pendulum starts to swing the other way.
The Millennials age group are expected to inherit $68 trillion by 2030 from Baby Boomer parents. Of course, that payout isn’t going to be even across the board, with wealthier families retaining the bulk of wealth and the majority of Millennials laden with debt.
And with Generation Z (born 1997-2012) starting to come of age, the uneven playing field is making it hard to begin accumulating wealth in the first place.
Since it is in the best interest of societies to have wealthy generations that can drive economic growth, potential solutions are being examined all over the political sphere. They include different taxation schemes, changing estate laws, and potentially cancelling student debt.
Whatever ends up happening, it’s important to track how the distribution of wealth changes over the coming decade, and begin accumulating your personal wealth as best as you can.
Money
Where People Borrow Money From, by Country Income Level
These graphics shed light on which people borrow money from financial institutions, and which rely on friends and family for monetary help.

When making the decision to borrow money, do you turn to friends and family for financial help, or do you go to a financial institution like a bank or credit card company?
On a country-to-country basis, this choice often depends on a mix of various factors, including the availability of financial services, financial literacy, and the cultural approach to the very concept of lending itself.
In these graphics, Richie Lionell sheds some light on where people borrow money from, using the 2021 Global Findex Database published by the World Bank.
Borrowing From Financial Institutions
To compare borrowing practices across both location and income level, the dataset features survey results from respondents aged 15+ and groups countries by region except for high-income countries, which are grouped together.
In 2021, most individuals in high income economies borrowed money from formal financial institutions.
Country | Region | Borrowed from a financial institution |
---|---|---|
Canada | High income | 81.01% |
Israel | High income | 79.52% |
Iceland | High income | 73.36% |
Hong Kong SAR, China | High income | 70.01% |
Korea, Rep. | High income | 68.64% |
Norway | High income | 66.82% |
United States | High income | 66.21% |
Taiwan, China | High income | 61.95% |
Switzerland | High income | 61.40% |
Japan | High income | 61.19% |
New Zealand | High income | 60.38% |
Australia | High income | 57.29% |
Austria | High income | 56.52% |
Italy | High income | 55.01% |
United Kingdom | High income | 54.98% |
Germany | High income | 54.68% |
Ireland | High income | 54.11% |
Denmark | High income | 53.16% |
Finland | High income | 52.98% |
Spain | High income | 51.92% |
Sweden | High income | 48.69% |
Belgium | High income | 47.98% |
France | High income | 44.37% |
Singapore | High income | 42.82% |
Slovenia | High income | 42.36% |
Uruguay | High income | 42.01% |
Brazil | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 40.75% |
China | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 39.19% |
Malta | High income | 38.95% |
Türkiye | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 37.84% |
Netherlands | High income | 34.45% |
Slovak Republic | High income | 34.41% |
Mongolia | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 34.39% |
Ukraine | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 34.13% |
Estonia | High income | 33.64% |
Croatia | High income | 33.03% |
Saudi Arabia | High income | 32.38% |
Poland | High income | 31.92% |
Czech Republic | High income | 31.33% |
Cyprus | High income | 31.25% |
Cambodia | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 30.89% |
Argentina | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 30.81% |
Portugal | High income | 30.44% |
Kazakhstan | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 29.76% |
Russian Federation | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 29.75% |
Thailand | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 28.26% |
Bulgaria | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 26.36% |
Armenia | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 26.17% |
Iran, Islamic Rep. | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 25.11% |
Chile | High income | 24.20% |
Georgia | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 23.89% |
Ecuador | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 23.23% |
Latvia | High income | 22.74% |
United Arab Emirates | High income | 22.46% |
Kenya | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 22.18% |
North Macedonia | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 22.10% |
Peru | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 21.95% |
Dominican Republic | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 21.65% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 21.30% |
Sri Lanka | South Asia | 21.29% |
Namibia | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 20.97% |
Serbia | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 20.65% |
Greece | High income | 20.11% |
Mauritius | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 20.09% |
Bolivia | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 19.30% |
Romania | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 19.14% |
Hungary | High income | 18.93% |
Uganda | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 18.62% |
South Africa | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 18.22% |
Colombia | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 18.10% |
Kyrgyz Republic | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 17.73% |
Kosovo | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 17.61% |
Costa Rica | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 17.46% |
Philippines | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 17.45% |
Liberia | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 15.42% |
Bangladesh | South Asia | 14.22% |
Nepal | South Asia | 14.11% |
Malaysia | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 13.48% |
Albania | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 13.39% |
Moldova | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 13.18% |
Indonesia | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 12.86% |
Tajikistan | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 12.43% |
Paraguay | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 12.39% |
Nicaragua | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 12.19% |
Jamaica | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 12.04% |
Lithuania | High income | 11.95% |
India | South Asia | 11.79% |
Mali | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 10.99% |
El Salvador | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 10.56% |
Panama | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 10.39% |
Honduras | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 10.32% |
Mozambique | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 10.27% |
Senegal | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 9.98% |
Tunisia | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 9.89% |
Jordan | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 9.86% |
Lao PDR | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 9.15% |
Venezuela, RB | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 8.83% |
Benin | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 8.21% |
Malawi | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 7.99% |
Uzbekistan | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 7.50% |
Togo | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 7.42% |
Ghana | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 7.40% |
Egypt, Arab Rep. | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 7.30% |
Myanmar | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 7.06% |
Cameroon | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 6.99% |
Zambia | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 6.76% |
Burkina Faso | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 6.66% |
Nigeria | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 6.40% |
Congo, Rep. | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 6.19% |
Guinea | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 6.11% |
Gabon | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 5.48% |
Morocco | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 4.99% |
West Bank and Gaza | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 4.94% |
Tanzania | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 4.45% |
Sierra Leone | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 4.29% |
Cote d'Ivoire | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 4.10% |
Algeria | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 3.80% |
Iraq | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 3.64% |
Pakistan | South Asia | 3.51% |
Lebanon | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 3.31% |
Zimbabwe | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 2.89% |
South Sudan | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 2.48% |
Afghanistan | South Asia | 2.05% |
With 81% of respondents borrowing from financial institutions, Canada tops this list. Meanwhile, Israel (80%), Iceland (73%), Hong Kong (70%), and South Korea (69%) are not far behind.
This is not surprising for richer nations, as financial services in these countries are more available and accessible. This, coupled with higher financial literacy, including a general understanding of interest rates and credit-building opportunities, contribute to the popularity of financial institutions.
Also, it’s worth noting that some countries have cultural practices that factor in. For example, 61% of respondents in Japan used formal financial institutions, which are a more socially acceptable option than asking to borrow money from friends and family (just 6% of people in Japan).
Borrowing from Friends and Family
In contrast, more individuals in lower income economies approached family and friends in order to borrow money.
Afghanistan tops this list with 60% of respondents relying on friends and family, compared to only 2% borrowing money from formal financial institutions.
Country | Region | Borrowed from family or friends |
---|---|---|
Afghanistan | South Asia | 60.18% |
Uganda | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 57.45% |
Kenya | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 54.40% |
Namibia | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 50.25% |
Morocco | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 48.73% |
Nigeria | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 44.71% |
South Africa | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 44.54% |
Iraq | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 44.10% |
Cameroon | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 43.49% |
Zambia | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 43.08% |
Zimbabwe | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 42.34% |
Guinea | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 42.04% |
Nepal | South Asia | 41.79% |
Jordan | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 41.76% |
Gabon | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 41.41% |
Liberia | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 41.37% |
Tunisia | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 41.05% |
Philippines | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 40.82% |
Türkiye | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 40.80% |
Iran, Islamic Rep. | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 39.80% |
Sierra Leone | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 39.02% |
Ghana | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 38.58% |
Egypt, Arab Rep. | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 37.75% |
Saudi Arabia | High income | 35.76% |
Bangladesh | South Asia | 35.49% |
Mali | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 35.15% |
Burkina Faso | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 35.14% |
Cambodia | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 34.85% |
Venezuela, RB | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 34.81% |
Togo | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 33.99% |
West Bank and Gaza | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 33.93% |
Thailand | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 32.83% |
Lao PDR | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 32.36% |
Moldova | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 32.18% |
Ukraine | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 32.17% |
Senegal | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 31.30% |
Armenia | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 31.29% |
India | South Asia | 31.02% |
Bolivia | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 30.69% |
Algeria | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 30.52% |
Cote d'Ivoire | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 30.20% |
Albania | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 30.00% |
Bulgaria | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 29.99% |
Benin | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 29.33% |
Mozambique | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 29.33% |
Tanzania | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 29.24% |
Colombia | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 29.08% |
Indonesia | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 28.85% |
South Sudan | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 28.84% |
Ecuador | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 28.79% |
Serbia | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 28.49% |
Russian Federation | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 28.40% |
Mongolia | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 27.01% |
Kyrgyz Republic | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 27.01% |
China | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 26.43% |
Honduras | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 26.07% |
Greece | High income | 25.94% |
Kosovo | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 25.86% |
Argentina | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 25.72% |
Kazakhstan | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 25.64% |
Romania | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 25.58% |
Malawi | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 25.24% |
North Macedonia | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 25.14% |
Dominican Republic | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 24.70% |
Brazil | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 24.66% |
Congo, Rep. | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 24.40% |
Lebanon | Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income) | 24.26% |
Nicaragua | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 23.75% |
Iceland | High income | 23.63% |
Peru | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 23.34% |
United Arab Emirates | High income | 23.04% |
Myanmar | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 23.03% |
Sri Lanka | South Asia | 22.53% |
Paraguay | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 22.20% |
Pakistan | South Asia | 21.87% |
Uzbekistan | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 21.53% |
Cyprus | High income | 20.95% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 20.94% |
Chile | High income | 20.72% |
Georgia | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 20.61% |
Mauritius | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | 20.48% |
Costa Rica | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 20.29% |
Jamaica | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 20.02% |
Tajikistan | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | 19.86% |
Poland | High income | 19.34% |
Norway | High income | 19.29% |
United States | High income | 18.09% |
Uruguay | High income | 17.60% |
Panama | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 17.54% |
Denmark | High income | 17.51% |
Croatia | High income | 17.09% |
El Salvador | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | 16.78% |
Slovenia | High income | 16.77% |
Latvia | High income | 16.57% |
Australia | High income | 16.44% |
Estonia | High income | 15.74% |
Malaysia | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | 15.44% |
Israel | High income | 15.43% |
New Zealand | High income | 15.19% |
Slovak Republic | High income | 15.02% |
Germany | High income | 15.01% |
Austria | High income | 14.41% |
Canada | High income | 14.00% |
Finland | High income | 13.43% |
Czech Republic | High income | 13.41% |
Korea, Rep. | High income | 13.16% |
Malta | High income | 12.99% |
Belgium | High income | 12.13% |
Sweden | High income | 11.79% |
Hungary | High income | 11.15% |
Lithuania | High income | 10.65% |
Spain | High income | 10.44% |
France | High income | 10.42% |
Netherlands | High income | 10.24% |
Ireland | High income | 9.84% |
Taiwan, China | High income | 9.70% |
Portugal | High income | 8.22% |
Hong Kong SAR, China | High income | 7.59% |
Japan | High income | 6.43% |
Switzerland | High income | 6.10% |
United Kingdom | High income | 5.24% |
Italy | High income | 5.06% |
Singapore | High income | 1.89% |
Many individuals in African countries including Uganda (57%), Kenya (54%), Namibia (50%), and Morocco (49%) also are choosing to borrow money from friends and family over financial institutions.
These preferences can be attributed to various factors including a lack of trust in banking and financial institutions, lacking access to such services, or the lack of information about such services if they are available.
And in some societies, borrowing from friends and family can be seen as a cultural norm, especially in places where mutual support and solidarity play a strong role.
What’s Next?
As viewed by the World Bank, financial inclusion is an important foundation of any nation’s development, and it’s also one of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. Increasing levels of financial inclusion helps give people access to services like savings plans, credit avenues, and online payments and transactions.
And thanks to commitments from countries and financial systems, global ownership of banking accounts has increased significantly (and been further spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic). According to the Global Findex Database, bank account ownership has risen to 76% in 2021, up from just 51% a decade prior.
However, access to these services is still rife with gaps when it comes to low income nations, low income individuals, and unequal access based on gender. The future of borrowing now relies on how nations deal with these challenges.
-
Money4 weeks ago
Comparing the Speed of Interest Rate Hikes (1988-2023)
-
United States2 weeks ago
Ranked: The Cities with the Most Skyscrapers in 2023
-
War4 weeks ago
Map Explainer: Sudan
-
Urbanization2 weeks ago
Ranked: The World’s Biggest Steel Producers, by Country
-
Travel4 weeks ago
Visualized: The World’s Busiest Airports, by Passenger Count
-
Visual Capitalist2 weeks ago
Join Us For Data Creator Con 2023
-
Technology4 weeks ago
Visualizing Global Attitudes Towards AI
-
Economy1 week ago
Charted: Public Trust in the Federal Reserve